Started By
Message
locked post

Miles did NOT screw up by not playing Lee

Posted on 1/11/12 at 3:08 pm
Posted by Hootie
BR
Member since Aug 2007
2125 posts
Posted on 1/11/12 at 3:08 pm
on Monday.

Now, he may have screwed up by not playing the kid more after the Nov. 5th game so as to have more confidence in him in case he needed a backup on Monday; but he didn't. The reality of the situation is Lee had played so-o-o-o little since October that it would have been careless to play him in that situation. Miles' QB strategy bit him the arse on Monday.

Did we need Lee or someone else? YES, no question. I'm NOT defending JJ's performance in ANY way. It sucked. The problem was we had no realistic option.
Posted by wish i was tebow
The Golf Board
Member since Feb 2009
46122 posts
Posted on 1/11/12 at 3:09 pm to
Posted by Boh
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2009
12357 posts
Posted on 1/11/12 at 3:09 pm to
quote:

Miles did NOT screw up by not playing Lee

Yes, yes he did.
Posted by Tiger Vision
Mandeville
Member since Jan 2005
3711 posts
Posted on 1/11/12 at 3:09 pm to
Jordan Jefferson either throws an interception or gets sacked every 6.25 pass attempts

Jarrett Lee either throws an interception or gets sacked every 23.8 pass attempts
Posted by BT
North La
Member since Aug 2008
9766 posts
Posted on 1/11/12 at 3:09 pm to
Blowfish
Posted by Doc Fenton
New York, NY
Member since Feb 2007
52698 posts
Posted on 1/11/12 at 3:09 pm to
You're missing the bigger issue: We should not have tailored our entire offense around the deficient skills of JJ for the last 3 years. It was always wrong.
Posted by coolmonk
Member since Jan 2007
1132 posts
Posted on 1/11/12 at 3:09 pm to
I feel better now that you feel that way.
Posted by hybrid3
Inside of 150
Member since Nov 2009
416 posts
Posted on 1/11/12 at 3:10 pm to
quote:

Miles' QB strategy bit him the arse on Monday.


This - times a 1,000
Posted by DocBugbear
Arlington, Texas
Member since Mar 2008
7963 posts
Posted on 1/11/12 at 3:11 pm to
If the only other QB option would have been Stephen Rivers, then Miles still would have screwed up by not giving Rivers a shot.
Posted by Adam Banks
District 5
Member since Sep 2009
32114 posts
Posted on 1/11/12 at 3:13 pm to
Agreed on the second issue. Despite being labeled team Jefferswag because I took up for the kid I always stated that Lee should have retained the starting job after bama. He was shell shocked on the 5th and needed to get his confidence back. There was no point in making a complete switch. Having both qbs ready helped the first time against bama and it may would have helped this time.

ETA despite JL being cold he should have been give a shot.
This post was edited on 1/11/12 at 3:15 pm
Posted by LSUEnvy
Hou via Lake Chas
Member since May 2011
12114 posts
Posted on 1/11/12 at 3:13 pm to
quote:

he may have screwed up by not playing the kid more after the Nov. 5th game


yes
Posted by peopleschamp
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2006
6576 posts
Posted on 1/11/12 at 3:13 pm to
Again how can you score Les than zero points? Are there negative points in football? What would it have hurt? Besides giving someone else a shot it would have given a shell-shocked JJ a much needed break even if for a few plays.
Posted by rollindaddy
Member since Jun 2010
1725 posts
Posted on 1/11/12 at 3:22 pm to
ur a fricking idiot
Posted by Chimlim
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Jul 2005
17716 posts
Posted on 1/11/12 at 3:25 pm to
The bigger issue is that Miles completley fricked up the offense because he was insistent on playing Jefferson and benching Lee. I have full confidence we would have beaten WKU, Ole Miss, Arkansas, and Georgia with Lee as the starter and JJ as the change of pace option runner.

With Lee at QB we only trailed once against Oregon for like 1 minute. But since he gave full reigns to Jefferson, the offensive production went down. We only scored 14 first half points against WKU, we fell behind 14-0 to Arkansas and 10-0 to Georgia -we were winning in spite of JJ. The only game JJ played where the offense didn't get off to a piss poor start was Ole Miss, and Ole Miss is so terrible we didn't even have to pass against them.
This post was edited on 1/11/12 at 3:27 pm
Posted by Catman88
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Dec 2004
49125 posts
Posted on 1/11/12 at 3:30 pm to
quote:

The reality of the situation is Lee had played so-o-o-o little since October that it would have been careless to play him in that situation.


How much did Lee play before getting put in against Tennessee last year in the come from behind win he led us to? He threw 1 pass the week before. Prior to that it was over a year.

And you are saying not playing in a month hurts him?
Posted by Broham
Crowley
Member since Feb 2005
18448 posts
Posted on 1/11/12 at 3:32 pm to
The game was pretty much over dumbass. We had nothing to lose.
Posted by Lacour
Member since Nov 2009
32949 posts
Posted on 1/11/12 at 3:35 pm to
quote:

Hootie


Go back to blowing fish
Posted by TheDoc
doc is no more
Member since Dec 2005
99297 posts
Posted on 1/11/12 at 3:37 pm to
Posted by lake chuck fan
westlake
Member since Aug 2011
9302 posts
Posted on 1/11/12 at 3:38 pm to
quote:

Did we need Lee or someone else? YES, no question. I'm NOT defending JJ's performance in ANY way. It sucked. The problem was we had no realistic option.


That is absolutely incorrect. Were you watching the first 9 games of the season??? Do you think JL forgot how to throw a football? WTF? JL was a proven successful option. I do agree with you saying it could have been Mett, what would it have hurt? But having JL standing there doing nothing while we slowly self destructed on Off. is crazy.


Posted by JohnnyU
Florida
Member since Nov 2006
12350 posts
Posted on 1/11/12 at 3:41 pm to
horseshite!
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram