That's not what I did.

I simply restated what happened in 2003 and said this year the result will be the same.

It is possible to review history for similar situations in order to make a comparison without claiming that because something happened previously it will happen again.

This post was edited on 11/15/11 at 3:14 pm

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by LOCO5150

NWA

Member since Sep 2011

4867 posts

Posted on 11/15/11 at 3:08 pm to relentlsspursuit

Yes, but what you are forgetting is 1993...huh? right? Yeah...we won in 1993...woo pig...right guys? (as I hold my hand up and no one gives me any love)

You are a fricking moron. 2003? GTFO

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by bpfergu

Member since Jun 2011

3485 posts

Posted on 11/15/11 at 3:25 pm to relentlsspursuit

quote:
That's not what I did.

I simply restated what happened in 2003 and said this year the result will be the same.

It is possible to review history for similar situations in order to make a comparison without claiming that because something happened previously it will happen again.

This is what you are attempting to do:

2003

A, B, and C happened with X results

2011

D, E, and F happened and I predict with X results

That is a CLAIM. You are CLAIMING that "X" will happen because of D, E, and F (which aren't even similar to A, B, and C, hence why this thread is even exponentially more retarded).

You can't "review history for similar situations" because the second part of your unfounded claim hasn't even occurred yet. And even if we do lose, it has no correlation to some arbitrary pattern you've concocted in your head, which is your attempted purpose of this ridiculous thread whether you want to admit it or not.

I don't even know why I'm arguing this.

1 ...

Report Post

SEC Rant - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board