Started By
Message

re: FSU’s loss to UGA did not happen. 13-0 Unconquered Rings unveiled

Posted on 4/24/24 at 10:33 am to
Posted by ClaimToFame
Member since Nov 2017
1587 posts
Posted on 4/24/24 at 10:33 am to
Alabama played Tennessee and Vanderbilt. The 2 worst teams in the east that season. The west wasn't very good overall either. Plus Alabama played its usual ooc cupcake opponents.
An Alabama fan talking about anyone else getting a mulligan
Alabama is well known as Mulligan U.
Posted by 3down10
Member since Sep 2014
22912 posts
Posted on 4/24/24 at 10:37 am to
quote:

Alabama played Tennessee and Vanderbilt. The 2 worst teams in the east that season. The west wasn't very good overall either. Plus Alabama played its usual ooc cupcake opponents.
An Alabama fan talking about anyone else getting a mulligan
Alabama is well known as Mulligan U.


4 of the 7 SEC West teams finished the season ranked, and the only 2 ranked SEC opponents Georgia faced were SEC West teams. And you lost 40-17 to Auburn.

Only 1 SEC West team failed to make a bowl game.

In 2018 Georgia not only got a mulligan to face Auburn again, you lost to yet another SEC West team you faced in the championship.

Georgia's record against the SEC West that year was 2-2 and only 2-2 instead of 1-2 because of your mulligan. And you were the best team the SEC East had to offer and the only one ranked.

You're an idiot.
This post was edited on 4/24/24 at 10:39 am
Posted by Tideroller
Lower Alabama
Member since Jan 2022
2388 posts
Posted on 4/24/24 at 3:54 pm to
quote:

Alabama is well known as Mulligan U.


I assume you're talking about 2011. LSU and Alabama played during the season as #1 and # 2 in the country, LSU won in OT. At the end of the year, LSU and Alabama were ranked #1 and #2. The BCS only had one stated goal, match #1 and #2. There was nothing in there about no rematches. LSU didn't like having to play us again and I don't blame them, but that's just the way it worked out under the rules in place. The option would have been for LSU to play a lower ranked team, just because. The committee would never have done that.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter