- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 3/12/24 at 9:42 pm to liz18lsu
quote:
And what if the aggressor is also intoxicated, with no recollection?
If two drunks frick, that's not a crime.
Posted on 3/12/24 at 9:42 pm to Btrtigerfan
Driving in texas with an open 16 ounce can of beer is not an issue. A 6 pax could be a problem
Posted on 3/12/24 at 9:43 pm to liz18lsu
Who doesn’t have recollection? The aggressor or the victim?
I think the law can be interpreted as: Intoxication means a man or woman cannot consent, but it does not remove his or her capacity to commit rape.
But I am not a lawyer.
I think the law can be interpreted as: Intoxication means a man or woman cannot consent, but it does not remove his or her capacity to commit rape.
But I am not a lawyer.
Posted on 3/12/24 at 9:43 pm to t00f
quote:especially when she's driving
There is nothing hotter than a super drunk gf/wife ready for sex.
Posted on 3/12/24 at 9:43 pm to Tantal
quote:
If two drunks frick, that's not a crime.
I am sure there are men who have gone to trial who would disagree.
Posted on 3/12/24 at 9:45 pm to liz18lsu
quote:
a person is raped, while voluntarily intoxicated, it doesn't count? You are stating the defense. My point, what about the offense? Two very different views, depending on the offense v. defense.
You’re thinking about it wrong
The rape victim has no culpability. The statute for third degree rape states that:
quote:
Third degree rape is a rape committed when the anal, oral, or vaginal sexual intercourse is deemed to be without the lawful consent of a victim because it is committed under any one or more of the following circumstances:
1)When the victim is incapable of resisting or of understanding the nature of the act by reason of a stupor or abnormal condition of mind produced by an intoxicating agent or any cause and the offender knew or should have known of the victim's incapacity.
This necessarily means that there can be only one victim.
Posted on 3/12/24 at 9:46 pm to liz18lsu
quote:
I am sure there are men who have gone to trial who would disagree.
Most likely. Although I'd be willing to bet that more men have been to trial over nothing more than being on the wrong side of an evil woman during a break-up/divorce.
Posted on 3/12/24 at 9:46 pm to liz18lsu
quote:I always found it cool when a cop shoots a drunk driver that pulled on the side of the road to not drive drunk anymore. Only one gets killed.
If you drive drunk, all on you.
Posted on 3/12/24 at 9:48 pm to liz18lsu
quote:I have no doubt you are correct but if both are drunk, how do you know who raped who?
I am sure there are men who have gone to trial who would disagree.
Posted on 3/12/24 at 9:48 pm to faraway
quote:the one who makes the complaint first is the victim
I have no doubt you are correct but if both are drunk, how do you know who raped who?
Posted on 3/12/24 at 9:48 pm to faraway
quote:
have no doubt you are correct but if both are drunk, how do you know who raped who?
It’s a factual question. What evidence is there to show that one knew the other couldn’t consent?
Posted on 3/12/24 at 9:51 pm to soccerfüt
quote:quote:
Does the distinction come from intent?
Misspelled “implication”.
Posted on 3/12/24 at 9:53 pm to Tantal
quote:
If two drunks frick, that's not a crime.
If it's two adults, there should be an equal amount of culpability. You should know better than to drive or operate heavy machinery if you are impaired. To suggest otherwise, would be to affirm that females are weaker and likely victims.
Posted on 3/12/24 at 9:57 pm to liz18lsu
If you start a new alcohol OP and it's nowhere near July/August yet, you're a mess on probation. Prove me wrong.
Posted on 3/12/24 at 9:59 pm to liz18lsu
quote:
Does the distinction come from intent?
The word lawyers get paid a lot of money to whip out would be mens rea.
Posted on 3/12/24 at 10:08 pm to Ryan3232
quote:
It’s not drinking and driving if you live in your car.
Posted on 3/12/24 at 10:14 pm to drizztiger
I love all these idiot do gooders that think just because you’ve had 2/3 drinks in a couple hours you deserve to die……
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News