- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 8/29/23 at 10:32 am to Weekend Warrior79
quote:
(don't recall which bankruptcy that is)
I think that's 7, corporations get more protection from that than individuals, airlines have used Chapter 11 as a business strategy since the 80s
This post was edited on 8/29/23 at 10:55 am
Posted on 8/29/23 at 10:51 am to BregmansWheelbarrow
quote:
Pretty sure It has to do with pharmacists filling prescriptions they shouldn’t. If they know doctors are way overprescribing to junkies, they shouldn’t be filling the scrips. Now, why pharmacists are responsible for these junkies and not their doctors, that I don’t know.
Exactly how is a pharmacist supposed to know that?
A doctor at a pain clinic is going to write a ton of pain meds. Unless they have specific evidence given to them that someone is running a pill mill how is a pharmacist responsible for policing doctors?
This is an obscene abuse of the legal system by the trial lawyers.
Posted on 8/29/23 at 10:52 am to Auburn1968
Rite Aid still open? 
Posted on 8/29/23 at 10:54 am to tide06
quote:
Exactly how is a pharmacist supposed to know that?
Lawyers just go for anyone with money.
Truth is secondary to $
Posted on 8/29/23 at 10:58 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Lawyers just go for anyone with money.
Truth is secondary to $
Easy fix, Sack up and go to trial. If your right, you win. If you lose, you pay. Problem solved.
(AND, if you do win, file motion to tax cost against those big bad trial lawyers and get all your costs back, or at least ones allowed by law)
Posted on 8/29/23 at 11:01 am to 777Tiger
Can the one person who downvoted this please explain your position?
Posted on 8/29/23 at 11:04 am to Auburn1968
Pharmacies are being sued because they were complicit in flooding cities beyond what is rational
Posted on 8/29/23 at 11:11 am to Auburn1968
quote:
I'm having a hard time understanding why pharmacies filling doctors prescriptions are liable in this case. Unlike some countries, pharmacies here don't have the power to prescribe drugs. They can only fill prescriptions from a doctor.
Because they want pharmacies to be able to refuse legitimate prescriptions from your doctor, like what happened during COVID with Ivermectin. Even if there isn't a law, leftists want to be able to sue pharmacies for filling legitimate prescriptions. The purpose is to destroy freedom.
Posted on 8/29/23 at 11:11 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
This new communism sucks.
McCarthy was right.
Posted on 8/29/23 at 11:12 am to stout
quote:
I think in LA a pharmacist can refuse a prescription refill if they have a valid concern.
Only valid concern would be a drug allergy or interaction issue in which case they discuss with ordering MD
This post was edited on 8/29/23 at 11:13 am
Posted on 8/29/23 at 11:52 am to Cosmo
Tramadol, a mild pain pill opioid was a fairly common pain prescription for arthritis , wounds, breaks and other minor issues. Limiting factor was constipation!!!!!!! 3-4 days of use would block me up tighter than concrete. Maybe I could join the law suit because I didn't give a crap.
The uncontrolled rise in fentanyl fatalities is do to the federal government interference in the doctor , patient relationship, blocking out the reasonable use of controlled issue Pain meds. Forced a large part of the population into searching for solutions without help
The uncontrolled rise in fentanyl fatalities is do to the federal government interference in the doctor , patient relationship, blocking out the reasonable use of controlled issue Pain meds. Forced a large part of the population into searching for solutions without help
Posted on 8/29/23 at 12:26 pm to tide06
quote:
Exactly how is a pharmacist supposed to know that?
there's a prescription monitoring program, that tracks patient's profiles and catalogues narcotic prescriptions... you are supposed to check that before filling any narcotic for a patient, to make sure everything is on the up and up...
back in the day about 15 years ago, they didn't have a system like this, and that's really when narcotics were being overprescribed and filled... the response to this by the DEA was very slow and happened about 5-7 years too late, and then they just sorta ran with it, to where it's overly restricted now... treat it sorta the same way as the illegal drug trade, in some ways in their approach...
and yes, pharmacists should have some resonsibility to watch for patterns and signs of misuse and/or abuse of prescription medications.... that's part of the job
Posted on 8/29/23 at 12:32 pm to Trevaylin
quote:
Tramadol, a mild pain pill opioid was a fairly common pain prescription for arthritis , wounds, breaks and other minor issues. Limiting factor was constipation!!!!!!! 3-4 days of use would block me up tighter than concrete. Maybe I could join the law suit because I didn't give a crap.
The uncontrolled rise in fentanyl fatalities is do to the federal government interference in the doctor , patient relationship, blocking out the reasonable use of controlled issue Pain meds. Forced a large part of the population into searching for solutions without help
My cousin has had five major back surgeries and needs some very strong pain killers. Now he's hard pressed to get anything strong enough to work.
Posted on 8/29/23 at 12:35 pm to RogerTheShrubber
Attorneys should stop being queers and go after people with no money
Posted on 8/29/23 at 12:35 pm to SelaTiger
Sacklers passing the buck....
Posted on 8/29/23 at 12:39 pm to Auburn1968
Bring back the old K & Bs
This post was edited on 8/29/23 at 12:40 pm
Posted on 8/29/23 at 2:39 pm to Auburn1968
quote:
I'm having a hard time understanding why pharmacies filling doctors prescriptions are liable
The literal function of a pharmacist is to be a barrier between physicians and patients, for the protection of patients.
Some doctors may pretend they are the end all be all for you getting medicine, but the final say is the pharmacist "filling" your prescription.
They are liable bc they failed to perform their function ethically.
Posted on 8/29/23 at 2:41 pm to Auburn1968
That sucks - there’s a cute Russian girl at my RAD pharmacy here. She’s super unfriendly though and the other day I was in there and interacted with her twice (about 2 hours apart) and she didn’t seem to remember me. Was quite a check on me pride.
This post was edited on 8/29/23 at 2:46 pm
Posted on 8/29/23 at 2:42 pm to Auburn1968
In some cases patients had huge quantities of pills from multiple doctors. The rationale is that pharmacists were told to overlook the huge red flag and that is the reason for the liability.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News