- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Pelosi will be called as a J6 witness by Trump. He will prove she orchestrated J6!!
Posted on 8/8/23 at 1:42 pm to Nutriaitch
Posted on 8/8/23 at 1:42 pm to Nutriaitch
quote:
because in a criminal trial, all you have to do is provide reasonable doubt. showing efforts to prevent something can also be viewed as "reasonable doubt" to him also using it.
How so?
2
Posted on 8/8/23 at 1:42 pm to roadGator
quote:Did you read/learn about Operation Trust? or just popping off smartazz comments?
Oh. That’s sounds OMINOUS.
Bear in mind if you are the latter that you are deemed unworthy of response.
Posted on 8/8/23 at 1:43 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
And none of them rely on or are based in Trump allegedly inciting, leading, or organizing the J6 fiasco.
Hmmm, the indictment tells a different story.
Posted on 8/8/23 at 1:44 pm to deathvalleytiger10
quote:hmm, indictments in Zimbabwe tell that same sort of story
Hmmm, the indictment tells a different story.
Posted on 8/8/23 at 1:45 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
How so?
"I didn't use the riot. Hell, I tried to prevent the damn thing."
I'm not saying it's a good argument
or even that it would be a successful one.
I'm saying that's the argument and relevance.
Posted on 8/8/23 at 1:45 pm to Timeoday
Just how old are you?
Moronic post.
The hate you have for America has no limits.
Pitiful, you are just pitiful.
Moronic post.
The hate you have for America has no limits.
Pitiful, you are just pitiful.
Posted on 8/8/23 at 1:45 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
because in a criminal trial, all you have to do is provide reasonable doubt. showing efforts to prevent something can also be viewed as "reasonable doubt" to him also using it.
How so?
You sir are a moron and a troll. I would suggest whoever keeps arguing with you to stop because it's obvious you are trolling or so oblivious/retarded that you can not grasp the concept of beyond a reasonable doubt.
Posted on 8/8/23 at 1:46 pm to deathvalleytiger10
quote:
the indictment tells a different story.
I disagree. None of the charges rely on any allegation of Trump organizing, etc the riot.
Do they in part involve him “using” the chaos to further attempt the Pence and fake elector scheme? Yes.
But I’m still wondering how anything related to security at the Capitol have to do with any of it.
Posted on 8/8/23 at 1:47 pm to boogedy
quote:
You sir are a moron and a troll. I would suggest whoever keeps arguing with you to stop because it's obvious you are trolling or so oblivious/retarded that you can not grasp the concept of beyond a reasonable doub
I fully understand it.
I’m wondering how in the world requesting certain measurements beforehand would introduce some sort of doubt as to whether Trump attempted to capitalize on the chaos once it was happening. I do not see the connection.
Posted on 8/8/23 at 1:49 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
Trump attempted to capitalize on the chaos once it was happening.
Explain this one to us...
Posted on 8/8/23 at 1:51 pm to deathvalleytiger10
quote:
Explain this one to us...
I can’t because it’s political bullshite just like all of the charges.
That doesn’t change the fact that whether or not Pelosi gave trump what he allegedly wanted has nothing to do with the charges.
This post was edited on 8/8/23 at 1:52 pm
Posted on 8/8/23 at 1:51 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
I disagree. None of the charges rely on any allegation of Trump organizing, etc the riot.
Do they in part involve him “using” the chaos to further attempt the Pence and fake elector scheme? Yes.
But I’m still wondering how anything related to security at the Capitol have to do with any of it.
They needed the riot to end the proceedings. Two congressman had already stood and objected to the electoral. Pense looked like a deer in head lights when they did. Luckily for him the "insurrection" was happening and they had to leave the capital. Pelosi quickly pushed it through later. She knew they were going to shoot it down so used a "insurrection" to push it through.
Posted on 8/8/23 at 1:53 pm to funnystuff
quote:already did exactly that
since you already did all that, will you please tell us what you uncovered?
exactly the reason you should seek actual knowledge
you could use actual knowledge for so many purposes, if you only knew how
oh well, posting sarcastic, anti-knowledge comments it is for you
Posted on 8/8/23 at 1:54 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
None of the charges rely on any allegation of Trump organizing, etc the riot.
The indictment is very clear, "directed them to the Capitol to obstruct the certification proceedings."
Enough of your foolishness. It is plain as day in the indictments.
Do you believe the prosecution will use J6 as evidence in the case of Trump obstructing certification proceedings?
Posted on 8/8/23 at 1:55 pm to Timeoday
pre-Jan 6 hope is back to the Jan 6 crowd.
Posted on 8/8/23 at 1:55 pm to deathvalleytiger10
quote:
Do you believe the prosecution will use J6 as evidence in the case of Trump obstructing certification proceedings?
No, at least beyond the mere fact that it happened. They don’t need it to prove any of the charges.
quote:
directed them to the Capitol to obstruct the certification proceedings."
What.
Does.
That.
Have
To
Do
With
Pelosi?
Posted on 8/8/23 at 1:55 pm to Motownsix
quote:
but like the 2020 election court cases fake evidence will not be submitted as evidence.
Those lacked this thing called 'standing'
Surely, Trump will have "standing" at his own trial for the charges of "inciting an insurrection to stop automatic certification of an election where he was never allowed to present any evidence of the cheating that was alleged"
or not?
I know - I know - Democrats have been stealing elections for so long they all think it is their "right" to steal elections. Nixon let them get away with it 63 years ago because he didn't want to start a 'constitutional crisis' - and because he felt like he should have won in spite of the cheating if he'd only campaigned better.
Set the precedent - if you are a GOP you have to accept whatever piece of crap the DEMs serve up for results.
BUT if you are a GOP and somehow manage to overcome all the cheating - Reagan, Bush, Trump - then the DEMs will ABSOLUTELY challenge your hard earned victory in the HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVEs by CHALLENGING THE ELECTORS!!!!
/\ that happens EVERY TIME /\ a DEM loses. And they just think it's cute!!!
they just don't think those same rules apply to THEM.
They are wrong.
This post was edited on 8/8/23 at 1:58 pm
Posted on 8/8/23 at 1:56 pm to ChineseBandit58
quote:
Surely, Trump will have "standing" at his own trial for the charges of "inciting an insurrection to stop automatic certification of an election where he was never allowed to present any evidence of the cheating that was alleged"
Well that’s not a charge, so no, he probably won’t be able to do any of that.
Posted on 8/8/23 at 1:57 pm to 19
quote:
imprisoned falsely
be sure to bring that up at sentencing.
Posted on 8/8/23 at 1:57 pm to Timeoday
quote:
Pelosi will be called as a J6 witness by Trump. He will prove she orchestrated J6!!
Why’s Trump always gotta be bringing up old shite!?!
Page 6 of 10
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News