- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why did O get 3.5 million a year?
Posted on 11/30/16 at 3:10 pm to glaucon
Posted on 11/30/16 at 3:10 pm to glaucon
quote:
Because that is the bare minimum you will be paid as the coach of LSU. If they paid him less than that it would look like he doesn't have the support of the administration and he needs that to recruit. We can complain about coaching salaries in general but O's salary is perfectly reasonable given the situation.
At least someone else gets it.
Posted on 11/30/16 at 3:12 pm to Cosmo
quote:
His deal should have been for $1 more than Aranda.
LSU should have let Master P write him up a contract similar to the one he negotiated for Ricky Williams.
Posted on 11/30/16 at 3:16 pm to glaucon
quote:
Because that is the bare minimum you will be paid as the coach of LSU. If they paid him less than that it would look like he doesn't have the support of the administration and he needs that to recruit. We can complain about coaching salaries in general but O's salary is perfectly reasonable given the situation.
That, and it wouldn't look good if a school was paying it's coordinators more than the HC.
O's actual market value is nowhere close to 3.5 per year. It's probably more around 1.2 (maybe). However, Aranda's is definitely above 1.2, and if they want a big name OC, he is going to ask for at least that much as well.
Posted on 11/30/16 at 3:37 pm to Alt26
I am fine with it to a degree if only 1 year is guaranteed. O doesn't deserve any guarantees beyond that with that salary.
And if people are antsy because he only has a short term guarantee, then they can suck it. He has to prove himself beyond a freaking interim tag before he deserves more.
And if people are antsy because he only has a short term guarantee, then they can suck it. He has to prove himself beyond a freaking interim tag before he deserves more.
Posted on 11/30/16 at 3:47 pm to Cosmo
The 3.5Mil is a byproduct of a lazy, piss poor AD trying to legitimize a terrible decision.
Posted on 11/30/16 at 4:03 pm to Cosmo
Nah, I think 3.5 is a bargain. You have to put faith in your head coach and the first step in showing that is salary. It also gives O incentive to work his way up the monetary ladder by winning big bowl games.
Posted on 11/30/16 at 4:53 pm to etm512
quote:
Are the details of the deal out? Is there a buyout in there?
I believe that was one of the reasons he sold himself to Alleva so well. There is no buyout in Orgeron's contract.
Posted on 11/30/16 at 4:55 pm to Cosmo
I don't give a shite about anything in his contract other than the buyout, which should be 0.
Posted on 11/30/16 at 5:13 pm to Damone
And he is better than Muschamp
Posted on 11/30/16 at 5:16 pm to DaphneTigah
quote:
I can't wait until O gets LSU to the playoffs next year and all you haters are going to be eating crow.
I would be pleasantly surprised if this happens. And what if LSU wins between 7 and 9 games?
Posted on 11/30/16 at 5:25 pm to Sid in Lakeshore
How is it fair? What has he done to warrant 3.5M a year?
That's about $70,000 a week, by the way to be a rah rah man who recruits for his coordinators.
His last stint he failed on a much grander scale than his predecessor as well as his successor.
That's about $70,000 a week, by the way to be a rah rah man who recruits for his coordinators.
His last stint he failed on a much grander scale than his predecessor as well as his successor.
Posted on 11/30/16 at 5:26 pm to DaphneTigah
quote:
You sound like the democrats who go on strike in front of McDonalds demanding $20 dollar minimum wage
Please explain this correlation, because to most of us with a functioning brain, it makes 0 sense.
Posted on 11/30/16 at 5:27 pm to Cosmo
quote:
Why did O get 3.5 million a year?
The real question is, how much did/will Ponamsky get?
Posted on 11/30/16 at 6:07 pm to DaphneTigah
quote:
I can't wait until O gets LSU to the playoffs next year and all you haters are going to be eating crow.
You were probably one of the mouth-breathers telling us that about Miles before this year.
Posted on 11/30/16 at 6:11 pm to LSUsuperfresh
If you go on LSU's facebook page, you'll quickly realize that all Louisiana women love coach O, just like they loved Les at the end of last year.
It's explains a lot.
It's explains a lot.
Posted on 11/30/16 at 6:19 pm to Cosmo
It's the min an LSU head coach will make.
The pay is not the problem.
The pay is not the problem.
Posted on 11/30/16 at 6:28 pm to Cosmo
quote:
His deal should have been for $1 more than Aranda.
Posted on 11/30/16 at 6:30 pm to tigerfan92
quote:
And he is better than Muschamp
At what?
Posted on 11/30/16 at 6:44 pm to Cosmo
I would have offered between 2 and 3 million with incentives.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News