Started By
Message

re: Feldman: Lanning buyout is considerably more than the $20 million being reported

Posted on 1/11/24 at 7:12 am to
Posted by sicboy
Because Awesome
Member since Nov 2010
77579 posts
Posted on 1/11/24 at 7:12 am to
Feldman touched on that as well, said the basic vibe he got from the Alabama staff when that happened was "it's totally fine if Lane isn't here". I imagine he rocked the boat too much with Saban and it just worth having him around.
Posted by DalenSA
Member since Jan 2023
1533 posts
Posted on 1/11/24 at 7:19 am to
Bama confirmed poor if they can’t cough up $20-30M for Dan Lanning’s buyout. Aggie is dishing out close to $80M to kick Jumbo to the curb
Posted by Bear88
Member since Oct 2014
13203 posts
Posted on 1/11/24 at 7:19 am to
Lane had been hired by FAU and Saban felt like Lane was not locked in totally with Bama and the playoffs with so many irons in the fire with his new job so he told him to go ahead bc we had Sark.

ETA- there were rumors Kiffin had missed/ showed up late to staff meetings during the playoff preparations and possibly was drunk …. Who knows
This post was edited on 1/11/24 at 7:40 am
Posted by Epic Cajun
Lafayette, LA
Member since Feb 2013
32421 posts
Posted on 1/11/24 at 7:24 am to
quote:

Also noted in his contract that the buyout if he were to leave for Alabama would be different than any other school.

This was in regards to Dabo leaving Clemson, he has a lower buyout clause if he leaves for Alabama rather than any other school.
Posted by Stew2581
Covington
Member since Oct 2021
833 posts
Posted on 1/11/24 at 7:31 am to
quote:

Maybe. But the choices are not great. I just can’t see anyone at Bama settling for someone like Norvell.
Norvell was close to being canned by FSU until Jordan Travis came along. The gumps would all riot, burn down their trailer parks and sister/wives all over Tuscaloosa would be beaten unmercifully if they hire Norvell
This post was edited on 1/11/24 at 7:32 am
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
94992 posts
Posted on 1/11/24 at 7:34 am to
If you are Lanning why in the holy hell would you leave?

Oregon has made the national title game with two different head coaches in the last 15 years. It’s not difficult at all to win there, they will lmatch whatever bama can pay, you don’t have to start over, and you don’t have to be in the shadow of the ultimate legend

It just doesn’t make any sense to me but these coaches often make decisions I never would
Posted by JakeFromStateFarm
*wears khakis
Member since Jun 2012
11901 posts
Posted on 1/11/24 at 7:38 am to
quote:

there were rumors Kiffin has missed/ showed up late to staff meetings during the playoff preparations and possibly was drunk

I wouldn’t be surprised if that was true
Posted by Vidic
Member since Jan 2010
9127 posts
Posted on 1/11/24 at 7:40 am to
Probably why you sit behind a computer shite posting all day while they are high achievers
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
94992 posts
Posted on 1/11/24 at 7:41 am to
quote:

Probably why you sit behind a computer shite posting all day while they are high achievers
Explain. Same pay, same benefits, same opportunity to succeed

What makes a high achiever choose Bama over Oregon? Wouldn’t a true high achiever want to be the program maker at Oregon
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
50405 posts
Posted on 1/11/24 at 7:42 am to
quote:

Tim Watts made a post last night saying Kiffin, Sark, and Lanning are all unlikely.


No one is unlikely for Bama. Kiffin wants the job.
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
50405 posts
Posted on 1/11/24 at 7:43 am to
quote:

What makes a high achiever choose Bama over Oregon? Wouldn’t a true high achiever want to be the program maker at Oregon


Following Saban would be a harder challenge imo.
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
94992 posts
Posted on 1/11/24 at 7:45 am to
quote:

Following Saban would be a harder challenge imo.
So high achievers just like to make shite more difficult on themselves for no real reason? That’s the argument now?

Choosing Bama over Oregon doesn’t make one a “high achiever” It’s such ignorant gump logic it’s wonderful
This post was edited on 1/11/24 at 7:46 am
Posted by usc6158
Member since Feb 2008
35342 posts
Posted on 1/11/24 at 7:46 am to
quote:

Oregon has made the national title game with two different head coaches in the last 15 years. It’s not difficult at all to win there, they will lmatch whatever bama can pay, you don’t have to start over, and you don’t have to be in the shadow of the ultimate legend



Oregon is also a much better job now in the NIL era than it was even 5-6 years ago. Division Street is by far the most professionally run collective and they have unlimited money. They are absolutely cleaning up California recruiting.
Posted by Epic Cajun
Lafayette, LA
Member since Feb 2013
32421 posts
Posted on 1/11/24 at 7:46 am to
quote:

If you are Lanning why in the holy hell would you leave? Oregon has made the national title game with two different head coaches in the last 15 years. It’s not difficult at all to win there, they will lmatch whatever bama can pay, you don’t have to start over, and you don’t have to be in the shadow of the ultimate legend It just doesn’t make any sense to me but these coaches often make decisions I never would

All of this, plus you get to raise your family in Eugene, Oregon rather than Tuscaloosa, Alabama.
Posted by rolltide32
Fort Payne, AL
Member since Nov 2013
6515 posts
Posted on 1/11/24 at 7:48 am to
quote:

Oregon can beat any Bama offer on the table. they have Nike behind them


They had coaches poached by Florida State and Miami in the last few years. All that Nike money going into the program is wasted on uniforms and has never been spent on anything of substance
Posted by OceanMan
Member since Mar 2010
20010 posts
Posted on 1/11/24 at 7:50 am to
Sounds like some vague BS, and if bama knows who they want they will pay whatever it takes.

Remember bama is mostly responsible for the huge buyouts today from the carousel of coaches in the SEC west trying to compete with them. They haven’t had to pay one of these buyouts by firing their coach since Bush was president.
Posted by sicboy
Because Awesome
Member since Nov 2010
77579 posts
Posted on 1/11/24 at 7:50 am to
quote:

Also noted in his contract that the buyout if he were to leave for Alabama would be different than any other school.

This was in regards to Dabo leaving Clemson, he has a lower buyout clause if he leaves for Alabama rather than any other school.



Oh ok. I was listening on my ride into the office.
Posted by usc6158
Member since Feb 2008
35342 posts
Posted on 1/11/24 at 7:50 am to
quote:

They had coaches poached by Florida State and Miami in the last few years. All that Nike money going into the program is wasted on uniforms and has never been spent on anything of substance



Letting both of those guys walk was a smart move
Posted by bigpapamac
Mobile, AL
Member since Oct 2007
22375 posts
Posted on 1/11/24 at 7:50 am to
Alabama hasn’t paid a football buyout in 17 years. They can afford it
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
94992 posts
Posted on 1/11/24 at 7:53 am to
quote:

They had coaches poached by Florida State and Miami in the last few years
And how did that work out for those coaches and FSU and Miami?

It seems poaching Oregon coaches has been an awful idea

Chip-failed
Fritz-failed
Mario-on the path to failing


Oregon seems to be the constant. Crazy coaches keep leaving just to be out in worse situations and fired
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram