Post-Signing Day SEC Position Rankings: Quarterback

I guess ESPN forgot about Bama losing Kiffin...that doesn't bold well for a young QB who heavily relied on him. Just saying.

This is the stupidest thing I've read today.

I'm going to say it again I bet who ever makes it out of this years QB competition will finsih in the top 6 of QBs in the sec and will have more wins than anyone besides maybe Bama's only bc their team has so much depth everywhere else. It's easy to play from the lead or with half of a field your defense gives you. Etling is easily one of the better QBs in the SEC and it's really not close. We'll see how they do with this staff but I'm willing to bet this team responds much more efficiently on offense, defense and special teams. Imagine this Aranda didn't really break his defense out until the UL game and he even said there's much more to his defense! This guy alone will win us lots of games next year. Our offense will be 10 times better than cams and the ST already improved after 1 game with the new guy in place! More TOs, Sacks, punt blocks, fumbles and recoveries are coming folks. Watch out and I hope to god all these fans and teams don't take LSU seriously next year!!

I bet LSU's qb rating is better than 13th in the conference.

What a stupid ranking, Etling's last 2 games against the aggies and cardinals he was fantastic, real good stats.

The more things change, the more they remain the same. A great big shout-out to the winningest coach in LSU history and world's greatest recruiter. Shambles.

Just another biased poll for "that team" to print t-shirts. I should open a t-shirt business in Alabama. Goldmine.

I don't think LSU should be at the top, but Bama!? Did anyone at ESPN watch the NC game? Or any Bama game last year for that matter? Bama shrouded his weaknesses all season and when Scarborough got hurt and Hurts has to go from game manager to game changer, he couldn't do it. I expect him to play better next year, but teams are starting to take notice and are no longer afraid of Bama.

Looks about right

A lot of "Butthurt" in here... Yall act like the QB position hasn't been out Achilles Heel for the past 4 years.

I was going to chime in with my 2 cents, but no need. You guys nailed it with your comments. Espn, what a joke! Let em have it, Tiger Fans!

1-14... with 1 being bad and 14 good

About right. Etling and Harris didn't exactly show much.

Ahh.... ESPN, the CNN of the sports world...

LSU is at #13 with a QB (who may not even be the starter in 2017) who completed 60% for 2123 yds? Lol. Had Etling started the Wisky and Jax. St games, he probably would've had over 2500. This is weak analysis, even for ESPN.

laughable that we are rated behind teams with new starting QBs. Etling was a world beater but he was a serviceable starter.

On projected talent I would possibly agree with this but if you're saying that LSU is in the 2nd worse position to win games with our situation then your madly mistaken. AL at number 1 is a complete joke, what was his numbers against LSU again? What about Clemson? With out that defense AL would be nothing at the QB spot. Shea Patterson will be running for his life this year and Auburn doesn't know wtf they are going to do at QB. This list is so wishy washy I don't know where he's going with it? LSU should be around 4 if you ask me. The QB that makes it out of this competition will win more games then anyone else on that list besides possibly bama's and that could even happen. Not one of those teams besides maybe Bama will have a chance against LSU next year. Mark my words!!!

This list is ridiculous. Shea Patterson, who started exactly 3 games (going 1-2 with weak performances in blowout losses to SEC powers Vandy and MSU), is #4, ahead of someone like Eason at UGA who returns after starting almost every game for a 7-5 UGA team. LSU is #13 despite the fact they have two senior QBs on the roster each with double-digit numbers of major conf. starts. Are either going to be finalist for the Davey O'brien award? Probably not. But to rank LSU's situation significantly BELOW other teams who have QBs who have never started a college game is absurd. According to this guy's rankings, it's better to have not played a game than to actually have won SEC games. I generally don't read the "expert" opinions on ESPN because the "experts" are usually just nerds with a computer who have never even played a competitive game of organized football. The few times I do read said opinions quickly remind me while I generally stay away from them in the first place

That's kind of ridiculous.

13th? Yeah ok!