Favorite team:LSU 
Location:under a dead log
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:Forester
Number of Posts:1687
Registered on:1/19/2007
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message

re: If we're sticking to running the ball

Posted by The Snake on 10/25/12 at 12:17 pm
Would be nice, but we're not heavy on good ball protection receivers. We are heavy on a diverse group of running backs. And our Quarterback seems a bit more concerned with his mustache than making good passes....

re: If we're sticking to running the ball

Posted by The Snake on 10/25/12 at 12:15 pm
"If" should be considered the abbreviation of "Since we are ineffective at any other part of a normal college level offensive strategy and the most impotent passing game we've had since around 1997 (roughly) there's no other choice than"...

re: If we're sticking to running the ball

Posted by The Snake on 10/25/12 at 12:08 pm
Didn't say it was my first choice of a offense, but we really aren't doing that much else other than punting. At least put more of our talent on the field. ...

If we're sticking to running the ball

Posted by The Snake on 10/25/12 at 12:03 pm
How about let's see something besides the I formation. Maybe some wishbone, Maryland I... Let's use these running backs 3 at a time and screw with every other teams strategy....

re: .

Posted by The Snake on 11/12/11 at 12:57 pm
I'd venture that its more to do with defensive superiority. When Wing pins back LSU's opponents they tend to stay back. LSU hasn't had the opportunity to gain as many yards because sadly they've had a short offensive field for a large # of possessions. 300+ yards a game working short field is ultra ...

re: .

Posted by The Snake on 11/12/11 at 12:29 pm
I'd venture that its more to do with defensive superiority. When Wing pins back LSU's opponents they tend to stay back. LSU hasn't had the opportunity to gain as many yards because sadly they've had a short offensive field for a large # of possessions. 300+ yards a game working short field is ultra ...

re: T.O with Steven A. Smith...

Posted by The Snake on 12/16/08 at 6:53 pm
[quote]1996 season Cowboys!!![/quote] They were pretty good though. Seems that this isn't their longest drought ever though....

re: T.O with Steven A. Smith...

Posted by The Snake on 12/16/08 at 6:48 pm
you're such a douche Stewart. :lol:...
I concur, it's horrible...

accidentally posted new thread on Rant

Posted by The Snake on 7/16/08 at 11:55 am
and meant for it to be on the OT, can someone move it. ETA: thanks admin, just carelessness, wasn't trying to post on the rant. ps - unwad your panties :lol: :lol: :lol:...

re: :woo:

Posted by The Snake on 7/15/08 at 7:14 am
:woo:...

re: LSU Wide Receivers

Posted by The Snake on 7/15/08 at 7:06 am
[quote]byrd is a senior.[/quote] and up to about 205 toliver will be #2 receiver,...

re: Goldman Sachs is getting cheap

Posted by The Snake on 7/14/08 at 1:36 pm
you two think it's major decline is over?...
[quote]Testicles] are in the worst place you could put them. They really are in harm's way." [/quote] amen...
how old are you do you plan on financing purchases ever or paying cash?...

re: Cowherd this morning

Posted by The Snake on 7/10/08 at 1:35 pm
[quote]Is there a stat for total NFLer's and not just starters?[/quote] i wouldn't think you'd wanna go ther....
[quote]bosoxs45[/quote] I read the numbers, I'm interested avg career length by conference....
sorry Karma, I can't listen at work and it's not carried on the ESPN i get on Sirius. I'd love to be able to call in and join in discussion for TD.com radio, but it just can't happen unless i'm at home during lunch....
[quote]Holy shite! A white wide receiver in the NFL?[/quote] gotta be fast. Maybe he was on coke or speed when he ran his 40. it makes you faster....
I think towelie got it... :lol: ...