- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: IRS emails - is it accurate that they could all be lost and not recoverable?
Posted on 6/24/14 at 4:05 pm to CAD703X
Posted on 6/24/14 at 4:05 pm to CAD703X
quote:
Q. Even if Ms. Lerner’s hard drive crashed, how could her emails have just disappeared? Were they backed up?
A. Apparently not, at least not permanently. Before it changed its storage policies last year, the I.R.S. backed up emails onto old-fashioned tape drives. Every six months, it reused those tapes, thus erasing the previous batch. wtf
Q. Really? Even a Gmail account archives everything.
A. Many government agencies and big corporations still use older email systems that, unlike Gmail, are not in the “cloud” — a name for services that store information so that it is always available and backed up. They may have tens of thousands of employees, as the I.R.S. does, making them slow to modernize.
When many of these systems were installed, computer storage was much more expensive than it is now. So they were intended for “disaster recovery, not e-discovery” for legal purposes, said Jonathan Feldman, the chief information officer for the City of Asheville, N.C., who has consulted for large companies and written extensively about data management practices. “I.T. people weren’t concerned with document retention.” wtf again
Posted on 6/24/14 at 4:06 pm to Murtagh
The whole "crashed hard drive" argument is laughable. I guess this whole idea of a centralized exchange server that gets backed up all the freaking time is TOTALLY over their head.
So is the IRS saying they have zero emails from that time period or just don't have hers? Cause the whole over written tape argument posted above would indicate that there are zero IRS emails available anywhere before their storage and retention policies changed?
So is the IRS saying they have zero emails from that time period or just don't have hers? Cause the whole over written tape argument posted above would indicate that there are zero IRS emails available anywhere before their storage and retention policies changed?
This post was edited on 6/24/14 at 4:09 pm
Posted on 6/24/14 at 4:12 pm to Murtagh
quote:
I'm sure the NSA has a list of people she sent emails to during that span of time...
hell, just ask the NSA for copies of HER emails
Posted on 6/24/14 at 4:15 pm to CAD703X
quote:
hell, just ask the NSA for copies of HER emails
yea, funny how quite the NSA has been
Posted on 6/24/14 at 4:15 pm to gmrkr5
quote:
So is the IRS saying they have zero emails from that time period or just don't have hers?
Part 11
quote:
As part of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Modernization Act, in 2003, the Agency drafted a guidance document (Guidance for Industry Part 11, Electronic Records; Electronic Signatures — Scope and Application1). This guidance was intended to describe the FDA’s current thinking regarding the scope and application of part 11 of Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations; Electronic Records; Electronic Signatures (21 CFR Part 11).
wtf this only applies to the FDA?
eta my company had to undergo this to deliver medical training to government employees.
it is a HUUUUUUUUUUUUGE hassle. nice that the IRS doesn't have to follow any procedures for electronic record archiving.
This post was edited on 6/24/14 at 4:18 pm
Posted on 6/24/14 at 4:17 pm to Korkstand
quote:
A. Many government agencies and big corporations still use older email systems that, unlike Gmail, are not in the “cloud” — a name for services that store information so that it is always available and backed up. They may have tens of thousands of employees, as the I.R.S. does, making them slow to modernize.
Gmail uses tape backups too
Posted on 6/24/14 at 4:20 pm to TigerBait1127
quote:
Many government agencies and big corporations still use older email systems that, unlike Gmail, are not in the “cloud” — a name for services that store information so that it is always available and backed up. They may have tens of thousands of employees, as the I.R.S. does, making them slow to modernize.
that whole statement is meant to mislead the public^^^
Posted on 6/24/14 at 4:23 pm to jdd48
of course they are using exchange...
This post was edited on 6/24/14 at 4:24 pm
Posted on 6/24/14 at 4:24 pm to TigerBait1127
quote:
Gmail uses tape backups too
I bet they don't overwrite theirs every 6 months though (if that old policy is to be believed)
Posted on 6/24/14 at 4:27 pm to jdd48
quote:
1.10.3.3.1 (07-08-2011)
Don’t Slow Down the System
To avoid slowing down transmission of information:
Use Arial or another simple font
that whole page is comedy gold.
Posted on 6/24/14 at 4:29 pm to CAD703X
How about this section?
1.10.3.2.3 (07-08-2011)
Emails as Possible Federal Records
All federal employees and federal contractors are required by law to preserve records containing adequate and proper documentation of the organization, functions, policies, decisions, procedures, and essential transactions of the agency. Records must be properly stored and preserved, available for retrieval and subject to appropriate approved disposition schedules.
The Federal Records Act applies to email records just as it does to records you create using other media. Emails are records when they are:
Created or received in the transaction of agency business
Appropriate for preservation as evidence of the government’s function and activities, or
Valuable because of the information they contain
If you create or receive email messages during the course of your daily work, you are responsible for ensuring that you manage them properly. The Treasury Department’s current email policy requires emails and attachments that meet the definition of a federal record be added to the organization’s files by printing them (including the essential transmission data) and filing them with related paper records. If transmission and receipt data are not printed by the email system, annotate the paper copy. More information on IRS records management requirements is available at LINK or see the Records Management Handbook, IRM 1.15.1 LINK ).
An email determined to be a federal record may eventually be considered as having historical value by the National Archivist prior to disposal. Therefore, ensure that all your communications are professional in tone.
Please note that maintaining a copy of an email or its attachments within the IRS email MS Outlook application does not meet the requirements of maintaining an official record. Therefore, print and file email and its attachments if they are either permanent records or if they relate to a specific case.
1.10.3.2.3 (07-08-2011)
Emails as Possible Federal Records
All federal employees and federal contractors are required by law to preserve records containing adequate and proper documentation of the organization, functions, policies, decisions, procedures, and essential transactions of the agency. Records must be properly stored and preserved, available for retrieval and subject to appropriate approved disposition schedules.
The Federal Records Act applies to email records just as it does to records you create using other media. Emails are records when they are:
Created or received in the transaction of agency business
Appropriate for preservation as evidence of the government’s function and activities, or
Valuable because of the information they contain
If you create or receive email messages during the course of your daily work, you are responsible for ensuring that you manage them properly. The Treasury Department’s current email policy requires emails and attachments that meet the definition of a federal record be added to the organization’s files by printing them (including the essential transmission data) and filing them with related paper records. If transmission and receipt data are not printed by the email system, annotate the paper copy. More information on IRS records management requirements is available at LINK or see the Records Management Handbook, IRM 1.15.1 LINK ).
An email determined to be a federal record may eventually be considered as having historical value by the National Archivist prior to disposal. Therefore, ensure that all your communications are professional in tone.
Please note that maintaining a copy of an email or its attachments within the IRS email MS Outlook application does not meet the requirements of maintaining an official record. Therefore, print and file email and its attachments if they are either permanent records or if they relate to a specific case.
Posted on 6/24/14 at 4:29 pm to CAD703X
quote:
1.10.3.2 (08-30-2012)
Security/Privacy
Email messages are official documents and should reflect this perspective. Email communications can be offered as evidence in court and can be legally binding. Before sending an email, you must consider how it reflects on the Service's image and take into account privacy, records management, and security factors.
apparently 'official documents' are not considered something to be monitored by others and stored/backed up/archived/kept in an official chain of custody...
This post was edited on 6/24/14 at 4:30 pm
Posted on 6/24/14 at 4:47 pm to Korkstand
quote:
Gmail uses tape backups too
I bet they don't overwrite theirs every 6 months though (if that old policy is to be believed)
even if you overwrite them, they can still be recovered.
the other thing that amazes me about this is emails almost always have two parties. And it sounds like there were multiple emails and multiple recipients.
But I do not underestimate gov't incompetence.
Posted on 6/24/14 at 4:49 pm to CAD703X
We can go round and round on this all day... If anyone believes that these emails were actually "lost" and not intentionally scrubbed is either in denial or plain stupid
If this administration has done anything, they have proven that they will do what they want and make up some stupid shite if/when people find out about it
If this administration has done anything, they have proven that they will do what they want and make up some stupid shite if/when people find out about it
This post was edited on 6/24/14 at 4:51 pm
Posted on 6/24/14 at 7:08 pm to gmrkr5
quote:
If this administration has done anything, they have proven that they will do what they want and make up some stupid shite if/when people find out about it
This.
The deal is they know they are lying, you know they are lying, they know that you know that they are lying, and they don't care because you can't do anything about it anyway.
Posted on 6/24/14 at 7:13 pm to bencoleman
I keep reading the latest articles thinking I must be missing a very key piece of info that makes this story plausible. But I'm not and it's baffling to me that not a year after the NSA scandal where people where sooooo outraged, that the majority seems to be like "oh ok, hard drive died. Works for me"
Posted on 6/24/14 at 8:06 pm to gmrkr5
I must have missed the fact that the administration is claiming 6 (!!!!) other hard drives crashed in the same time frame. Given that info, their scenario is absolutely impossible. You'd have a better chance at winning the lottery and getting struck by lightning in the same day than that happening.
This post was edited on 6/24/14 at 8:10 pm
Posted on 6/25/14 at 8:43 am to jdd48
I wonder if we can get away with saying to the IRS if we're audited, I don't have the records from those months because I only keep my stuff 6 months before it's overwritten.
Posted on 6/25/14 at 8:50 am to Murtagh
quote:
I wonder if we can get away with saying to the IRS if we're audited, I don't have the records from those months because I only keep my stuff 6 months before it's overwritten.
something tells me the rules that apply to us dont apply to them
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News