Started By
Message

Hidden Traps in AT&T Next plans?

Posted on 4/21/15 at 12:59 pm
Posted by Vlad The Inhaler
Moose Jaw, SK
Member since Sep 2008
3160 posts
Posted on 4/21/15 at 12:59 pm
Sorry if this has all been discussed other places, but I wanted to ask if anyone had experience with Next.

I've run all the numbers for my situation, but am naturally suspicious that they are seemingly pushing people to a cheaper plan an supposedly discontinuing 2 year contracts. Maybe it's just me.

My concerns are the following:

If you lose/break/damage phone, are you SOL as far as trade in? Are you on the hook for $600+ if anything happens thus buying tiers of insurance plans? With a contract you have far less invested and dependent.

Any other backend catches with Next?

TIA
Posted by Croacka
Denham Springs
Member since Dec 2008
61441 posts
Posted on 4/21/15 at 1:15 pm to
quote:

With a contract you have far less invested and dependent.


How so?


You are still required to pay 2 years of bills, even if you stop using the phone or lose it, etc.

On a 2 year plan, if you lost or destroyed a phone with no insurance, you were on the hook for the replacement so it's not much different than now.
Posted by ILikeLSUToo
Central, LA
Member since Jan 2008
18018 posts
Posted on 4/21/15 at 1:21 pm to
quote:

I've run all the numbers for my situation, but am naturally suspicious that they are seemingly pushing people to a cheaper plan an supposedly discontinuing 2 year contracts. Maybe it's just me.


Well, tell me about your current plan. What are you getting and for how much? (including minutes, texting, data, all of that).

quote:

If you lose/break/damage phone, are you SOL as far as trade in?


Yeah. Basically, when you take the phone, you've bought it. It's yours. Consider the installments an interest-free loan from AT&T, completely independent of any insurance or other warranty. It's your choice whether you want to trade it in vs. pay it off.

I wrote a long, sarcastic-ish post in another thread regarding this. The next plan is a bad deal unless you're already stuck on one of the newer family share plans anyway and are intending to pay off rather than "rent" the phone. Because if you do the 12-month next plan, you are paying ALL of the sales tax on the phone, plus 60% of the phone's retail value, and then giving it back. That's only the best case scenario. If you do the 18-month upgrade, you are paying 75% of the phone's value and then giving it back.

You're right to be suspicious, because AT&T has done all of this shite only as a less-than-straightforward way to raise prices and discontinue the 2-year phone subsidy.
Posted by Broketec
Dumpster Fire
Member since Sep 2006
1226 posts
Posted on 4/21/15 at 1:23 pm to
If you don't have insurance, you're as on the hook, yes.
On T-Mobile, Jump program is similar. New phone once a year, return the old one etc.
Difference is, Jump requires insurance on the device. So when I broke my Note 3, I had to shell out $175 for a refurb replacement. Had I not had insurance, I would have been billed monthly for the $19/mo for the remainder of the life of the financing (2 years) even if I didn't have the device.

I'm not sure if AT&T requires insurance but I'd imagine if they didn't and you broke or lost the device, you're going to be paying per month for the life of the fiance. They won't charge you one lump sum unless you cancel your service.
My wife is on Next and when I got her the phone they told us that if the phone is lost or damaged, we're going to be billed monthly until we:
A) pay the deductible to replace it and return the damaged device(which goes down as the phone gets older) B) don't replace it and pay off the finance charges per month.

This post was edited on 4/21/15 at 1:24 pm
Posted by ILikeLSUToo
Central, LA
Member since Jan 2008
18018 posts
Posted on 4/21/15 at 1:26 pm to
quote:

if you lost or destroyed a phone with no insurance, you were on the hook for the replacement so it's not much different than now.


Well, that's the point. If you lose/break your phone, you're going to want another one because you still have your AT&T service. However, with the old 2-year subsidized phone offer, you paid $199 plus tax and upgrade fee on your phone. If you lost it, you were out ~$250 and need a new phone. If something happens to your phone under the next plan, you're out $650+ and still need a new phone... In both scenarios, you'll have to buy your replacement phone outright, so the difference here is what you paid for the first one.

However, since AT&T's current scheme is to penalize the customer $25/month per phone if they do the 2-year subsidy, you're fricked either way. So this only applies to people who have held on to their older grandfathered plans and didn't fall for the trickery that arrived with Next.
Posted by Croacka
Denham Springs
Member since Dec 2008
61441 posts
Posted on 4/21/15 at 1:27 pm to
At the end of 12 months if you want a new phone you can still choose to pay off the remaining 8 payments of your current phone and do what you please with it


They aren't prying it from your hands
Posted by ILikeLSUToo
Central, LA
Member since Jan 2008
18018 posts
Posted on 4/21/15 at 1:28 pm to
I believe I said that.
Posted by Croacka
Denham Springs
Member since Dec 2008
61441 posts
Posted on 4/21/15 at 1:29 pm to
I agree with your last paragraph

The old old plans are still more cost effective for some users as opposed to NEXT

If you are currently on family share, next should be very close to the same as you are currently paying but with more freedom
Posted by Croacka
Denham Springs
Member since Dec 2008
61441 posts
Posted on 4/21/15 at 1:31 pm to
Not in this thread, but maybe the other one you did

I'm on Verizon's edge plan which is essentially the same


These plans work better for groups than they do for individuals IMO
Posted by uway
Member since Sep 2004
33109 posts
Posted on 4/21/15 at 1:36 pm to
quote:

However, since AT&T's current scheme is to penalize the customer $25/month per phone if they do the 2-year subsidy, you're fricked either way. So this only applies to people who have held on to their older grandfathered plans and didn't fall for the trickery that arrived with Next.


They always made you pay for the whole phone by charging you the $25 per month. This is just a more transparent way of doing things. Plus you come out better now if you opt for a cheaper phone because the old way penalized everyone the same, regardless of phone choice.
Posted by Croacka
Denham Springs
Member since Dec 2008
61441 posts
Posted on 4/21/15 at 1:40 pm to
IMO the best way to get the most out of NEXT is to purchase phones outright from ebay, other sellers, or even used.

The other thing is you now benefit from using these phones for longer than 2 years, even though they are obviously trying to deflect from that by targeting all the early upgrades.

My hope was that this phone price transparency would help make phones cheaper and cheaper from manufacturers...or at least more competitive.
Posted by ILikeLSUToo
Central, LA
Member since Jan 2008
18018 posts
Posted on 4/21/15 at 1:47 pm to
It's easy enough to work out the math with the current plans. It's best to calculate 24-month costs. Let's assume Vlad and his wife would be on the current 10GB plan.

Under the subsidized $200 phones using the current scam plan:

Plan: $100/month
Smartphone access charge (lol): $40/month per phone ($80/month total)

$180 x 24 months = $4320

Plus, let's assume normal $199 subsidized smartphones. 2 of those at $199 plus 9% tax and $40 "upgrade fee" per phone, roughly $515 for both phones.

Total 24-month cost, approximately $4835.


Buying your phone outright, whether it's through ATT Next installments or a direct purchase elsewhere:

Plan: $100/month
Smartphone access charge (lol): $15/month per phone ($30/month total)

$130 x 24 months = $3120

Plus, let's assume standard premium phone price like an iPhone 6. Two of those for $649 plus 9% tax. Approximately $1415

Total 24-month cost, approximately $4535. $300 less than the new contract scam.

Renting your phone for 12 months at a time through AT&T Next
Plan: $100/month
Smartphone access charge (lol): $15/month per phone ($30/month total)

$130 x 24 months = $3120

Plus $32.50/month for 12 months, then trade in for another phone for $32.50/month the next twelve months. 2 phones = $65/month for 24 months.

Total 24-month cost, approximately $4680. A $145 premium over 24 months to rent your phone and get yearly upgrades instead, not counting the money lost by not being able to sell your phone if you'd paid it off and kept it for 2 years.


AT&T has basically made it a poor decision to do the subsidized contract price IF you aren't grandfathered by an old plan.
Posted by ILikeLSUToo
Central, LA
Member since Jan 2008
18018 posts
Posted on 4/21/15 at 1:48 pm to
quote:

Not in this thread, but maybe the other one you did



My first reply in this thread
quote:


Yeah. Basically, when you take the phone, you've bought it. It's yours. Consider the installments an interest-free loan from AT&T, completely independent of any insurance or other warranty. It's your choice whether you want to trade it in vs. pay it off.
Posted by Vlad The Inhaler
Moose Jaw, SK
Member since Sep 2008
3160 posts
Posted on 4/21/15 at 1:51 pm to
Thanks

My current plan is Mobile Share Value and we just need new phones.

Running all the numbers comparing 2 year vs Next (including work discounts) shows Next is about $10 cheaper per month with all my factors, but I don't like the idea of paying $600 for a phone. If it's lost, I owe the difference I assume?



Posted by CubsFanBudMan
Member since Jul 2008
5071 posts
Posted on 4/21/15 at 1:53 pm to
quote:

Plus you come out better now if you opt for a cheaper phone because the old way penalized everyone the same, regardless of phone choice.


Theoretically they were subsidizing the same amount for each phone, so a cheaper phone was still cheaper initially.
Posted by Vlad The Inhaler
Moose Jaw, SK
Member since Sep 2008
3160 posts
Posted on 4/21/15 at 1:55 pm to
quote:

. If something happens to your phone under the next plan, you're out $650+ and still need a new phone... In both scenarios, you'll have to buy your replacement phone outright, so the difference here is what you paid for the first one.


That's my concern right there. I've never lost a phone, but hate the idea of owing this much to those assclowns in that scenario.

Next seems be great if you have several lines and use a lot of of data and want new phones fairly often.
Posted by ILikeLSUToo
Central, LA
Member since Jan 2008
18018 posts
Posted on 4/21/15 at 1:56 pm to
quote:

They always made you pay for the whole phone by charging you the $25 per month.


If by always you mean only in the last year or two, sure. I'm talking about what AT&T used to do before they introduced the Next plan. I have to explain this in every single AT&T thread, so that people like you don't inadvertently convince someone to jump out of their older grandfathered plan. For more than a decade before the Next Plan, the subsidized on-contract price was a promo to keep customers long term. Whether it was built into the service price or not was irrelevant, because the minute AT&T Next arrived, AT&T used it as a distraction to raise prices by shifting costs around. For anyone not grandfathered into an old plan, it suddenly became more expensive to get the on-contract subsidized phone, simply because AT&T made it that way.
Posted by Croacka
Denham Springs
Member since Dec 2008
61441 posts
Posted on 4/21/15 at 1:58 pm to
quote:

A $145 premium over 24 months to rent your phone and get yearly upgrades instead



That premium is worth it to some people, and it's just an option


An option that you didn't have before NEXT
This post was edited on 4/21/15 at 1:59 pm
Posted by Vlad The Inhaler
Moose Jaw, SK
Member since Sep 2008
3160 posts
Posted on 4/21/15 at 1:58 pm to
quote:


On a 2 year plan, if you lost or destroyed a phone with no insurance, you were on the hook for the replacement so it's not much different than now.



You're right with what you said in your post.

My point is that if I lose phone I've paid $100 for it's better than paying off the same phone I owe $500 for plus a new one.
Posted by Croacka
Denham Springs
Member since Dec 2008
61441 posts
Posted on 4/21/15 at 2:01 pm to
If you lost a phone before next, you still owed them for the rest of your contract so you were on the hook for money either way
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram