Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

File Copy Program Suggestions Besides TeraCopy

Posted on 8/11/16 at 7:20 am
Posted by Macfly
BR & DS
Member since Jan 2016
8088 posts
Posted on 8/11/16 at 7:20 am
I've been using TeraCopy.
Do you have any suggestions for an alternative program?
I frequently have to copy files to a 7200 RPM external drive to work offsite.
Posted by WavinWilly
Wavin Away in Sharlo
Member since Oct 2010
8783 posts
Posted on 8/11/16 at 7:28 am to
Robocopy.
CLI tool but it's great
Posted by t00f
Not where you think I am
Member since Jul 2016
90037 posts
Posted on 8/11/16 at 8:12 am to
Here you go:

Getsync
Posted by CubsFanBudMan
Member since Jul 2008
5072 posts
Posted on 8/11/16 at 9:35 am to
Secondcopy, but haven't used it in years. I now use Code42/Crashplan for backups.
Posted by mdomingue
Lafayette, LA
Member since Nov 2010
30361 posts
Posted on 8/11/16 at 1:08 pm to
quote:

Robocopy


I second this, it's what we use where I work.
Posted by Macfly
BR & DS
Member since Jan 2016
8088 posts
Posted on 8/11/16 at 1:43 pm to
S O L D ! .. all, thanks for the sharing your info and I'm using Robocopy.

Posted by WavinWilly
Wavin Away in Sharlo
Member since Oct 2010
8783 posts
Posted on 8/11/16 at 1:56 pm to
quote:

S O L D ! .. all, thanks for the sharing your info and I'm using Robocopy.



look into the different swtiches. I've found /MT:16 (you can assign any number of threads) can greatly speed up my transfer time.
Posted by LSshoe
Burrowing through a pile o MikePoop
Member since Jan 2008
4015 posts
Posted on 8/11/16 at 9:42 pm to
Emcopy is basically an advanced version of robocopy. Up to 256 threads. 32 and 64 bit versions. Flags are pretty similar to robocopy. It's free as in beer but you'll either need an emc account to download or find some site that will redistribute. Pm me and I can get it for you if you need though.
Posted by Spock's Eyebrow
Member since May 2012
12300 posts
Posted on 8/11/16 at 11:21 pm to
Not sure how multithreading helps with file copying, which is I/O bound by definition. Given enough time to run, and especially with larger files, it will reach a point where the destination drive can't keep up with the cached data to be copied, and then, it can't be any better than single threading. It could actually be worse, especially with spinning disks due to thrashing. Also, if it's implemented poorly, it could fragment the copied files. That all assumes different source and destination disks. If they're the same, multithreading can only hurt.
Posted by LSshoe
Burrowing through a pile o MikePoop
Member since Jan 2008
4015 posts
Posted on 8/12/16 at 8:06 am to
It definitely depends on the situation. If you have lots of small files, copying one at a time will likely be significantly slower than doing multiple. You are right that there would definitely be diminishing returns on multithreading when you're copying from a single drive to another, or even the same disk.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram