- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Top markets thru 3 USWNT matches
Posted on 6/17/15 at 6:13 pm
Posted on 6/17/15 at 6:13 pm
Top Fox markets thru 3 #USA games:
1 STL
2 DC
3 Milw & Richmond
5 Baltimore & Hartford
7 KC
8 Prov., ATL, Dayton, NY, Norfolk, Portland
Not shocked at St.Louis, they broke the record for biggest crowd for a US womens friendly, when they played at Busch Stadium. And a lot of good womens soccer and teams in area. Shocked Kc isn't higher
1 STL
2 DC
3 Milw & Richmond
5 Baltimore & Hartford
7 KC
8 Prov., ATL, Dayton, NY, Norfolk, Portland
Not shocked at St.Louis, they broke the record for biggest crowd for a US womens friendly, when they played at Busch Stadium. And a lot of good womens soccer and teams in area. Shocked Kc isn't higher
3
Posted on 6/17/15 at 6:13 pm to stlslick
Congrats on your support of women's soccer?
Posted on 6/17/15 at 6:18 pm to Broski
quote:
Congrats on your support of women's soccer?
It's not me, i cannot watch the stuff. It's as bad as Womens hockey.
Posted on 6/17/15 at 7:06 pm to stlslick
Best fans in women's soccer
Posted on 6/17/15 at 8:48 pm to stlslick
quote:
i cannot watch the stuff
And a lot of good womens soccer and teams in area.
wait a minute
Posted on 6/18/15 at 8:13 am to WarSlamEagle
I was at iTap in Soulard on Tuesday hoping to watch the NBA Finals.
Nope, not a chance.
Nope, not a chance.
Posted on 6/18/15 at 8:55 am to stlslick
quote:
STL
Maybe if your city would stop jerking off to the cardinals so much, the MLS would give you a team. Garber clearly wants to, and you haven't given a reason to.
Posted on 6/18/15 at 3:55 pm to 5thTiger
quote:
Maybe if your city would stop jerking off to the cardinals so much, the MLS would give you a team.
I get that you are a KC douche bag but really man? The Cardinals dont have a thing to do with MLS not being in St Louis.
Posted on 6/18/15 at 4:00 pm to 5thTiger
quote:
Maybe if your city would stop jerking off to the cardinals so much, the MLS would give you a team. Garber clearly wants to, and you haven't given a reason to.
St. Louis isn't getting a team because there is no ownership group stepping up to the plate. No other reason. Cardinals? Uh, ok.
Posted on 6/18/15 at 4:06 pm to cwil177
quote:
St. Louis isn't getting a team because there is no ownership group stepping up to the plate. No other reason. Cardinals? Uh, ok.
Absolutely correct, there were ownership groups but just none that are willing to drop 300 million plus on a soccer specific stadium in the past. There will be MLS in st louis soon. Either at the new riverfront stadium for the rams or if the Rams move there are good rumors of a SSS being built by an already lined up ownership group that met with Garber last month in St Louis behind closed doors.
Some people from KC have a serious "little brother" complex in regards to St Louis.
Posted on 6/18/15 at 8:50 pm to kilo
What is your definition of "soon?" 
Posted on 6/18/15 at 9:01 pm to cwil177
quote:
What is your definition of "soon?"
Well, like 2018-20 "Soon".
An expansion team could be awarded before that once ducks are in a row and a) the riverfront stadium for the Rams has broke ground or b) Lock tight guarantees of SS Stadium being built upon awarding of expansion club.
This post was edited on 6/18/15 at 9:04 pm
Posted on 6/18/15 at 10:33 pm to kilo
quote:
There will be MLS in st louis soon
People have literally been saying this since '96
Posted on 6/18/15 at 10:35 pm to arkyhawk
quote:
People have literally been saying this since '96
No they havent.
Posted on 6/19/15 at 1:01 am to cwil177
Forgive my ignorance, but why is it so important for St. Louis to have an MLS team? More of a Midwest presence for the league or something? Surely if there were enough interest from the people there, it would have happened by now right? MLS has several clubs that are located in way less attractive soccer markets. Why hasn't it happened yet?
Posted on 6/19/15 at 1:32 am to mynamebowl
St. Louis has a great soccer culture. When I lived there I could find pickup games all around the city. It was great. Lots of people really excited about soccer. Sports is one thing that town does right. Stl had one of the oldest leagues in the nation and SLU has a good team usually. I didn't like living there but the soccer culture made it bearable for me.
Posted on 6/19/15 at 4:33 am to hendersonshands
quote:
Best fans in women's soccer
Typical Cards fans
Posted on 6/19/15 at 7:24 am to Broski
quote:
Congrats on your support of women's soccer?
Posted on 6/19/15 at 8:53 am to cwil177
quote:
St. Louis isn't getting a team because there is no ownership group stepping up to the plate. No other reason. Cardinals? Uh, ok
St. Louis is full on behind the cards...and the Blues too I guess. They have neglected the Rams, and thus, Stan Kroenke is preparing to move the team. With results like that, of course ownership would be wary of dropping a sizable investment on a MLS team that might not get the support.
It's not a little brother thing, its the facts of business. If I'm a businessman, I'm sure as heck not putting 300 million into the St. Louis market that doesn't support 3 big teams.
It is a cause and effect type of thing. Because St. Louis has shown that they don't support the Rams, ownership groups are wary to invest. My pointing out the support for the cardinals was simply showing that it is possible for the city to support pro teams, just that they choose not to (rams).
This post was edited on 6/19/15 at 9:23 am
Posted on 6/19/15 at 10:45 am to 5thTiger
quote:
St. Louis is full on behind the cards...and the Blues too I guess. They have neglected the Rams, and thus, Stan Kroenke is preparing to move the team. With results like that, of course ownership would be wary of dropping a sizable investment on a MLS team that might not get the support.
It's not a little brother thing, its the facts of business. If I'm a businessman, I'm sure as heck not putting 300 million into the St. Louis market that doesn't support 3 big teams.
It is a cause and effect type of thing. Because St. Louis has shown that they don't support the Rams, ownership groups are wary to invest. My pointing out the support for the cardinals was simply showing that it is possible for the city to support pro teams, just that they choose not to (rams).
You're a fricking idiot. The only reason the Rams have problems is because they haven't had a winning season in 13 years and had a period where they had the worst 7 years stretch of any NFL franchise in histroy, and the support they have given the performance on the field is pretty good. Its interesting watching a KC person be so critical and come to such conclusions given the Royals lack of support under similar circumstances.
quote:
It's not a little brother thing
Yes, yes it is. You dont have a clue what you are talking about and knee jerk to typical little brother KC digs on St Louis. Its predictable and typical for you.
This post was edited on 6/19/15 at 10:59 am
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News