- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Top markets thru 3 USWNT matches
Posted on 6/19/15 at 11:02 am to kilo
Posted on 6/19/15 at 11:02 am to kilo
quote:
You're a fricking idiot. The only reason the Rams have problems is because they haven't had a winning season in 13 years and had a period where they had the worst 7 years stretch of any NFL franchise in histroy, and the support they have given the performance on the field is pretty good. Its interesting watching a KC person be so critical and come to such conclusions given the Royals lack of support under similar circumstances.
Except I don't wonder why we aren't getting a hockey or NBA team.
1
Posted on 6/19/15 at 11:17 am to 5thTiger
quote:
Except I don't wonder why we aren't getting a hockey or NBA team.
Except no one "wondered" anything about ST Louis MLS in this thread until you popped off at the mouth.
You started in with your little bro KC rhetoric in this thread. Its pretty sad.
This post was edited on 6/19/15 at 11:22 am
Posted on 6/19/15 at 11:25 am to kilo
quote:
Except no one "wondered" anything about ST Louis MLS in this thread until you popped off at the mouth.
You started in with your little bro KC rhetoric in this thread. Its pretty sad.
Never mentioned KC until you did. Seemed appropriate to bring up the MLS, given they are apparently the largest TV market for the WWC and don't have a MLS team. Sure, I made a little dig at the cards, but all my points were fair and valid.
Posted on 6/19/15 at 11:32 am to 5thTiger
quote:
Never mentioned KC until you did. Seemed appropriate to bring up the MLS, given they are apparently the largest TV market for the WWC and don't have a MLS team. Sure, I made a little dig at the cards, but all my points were fair and valid.
No, your points are not "valid". You couldnt help yourself. You came across something "St Louis" and couldnt help but stop and take a piss on it like the typical little bro KC type that you are. I mean all the typical current popular KC digs on ST Louis sports you plopped down in this thread.
Posted on 6/19/15 at 1:18 pm to kilo
quote:
No, your points are not "valid". You couldnt help yourself. You came across something "St Louis" and couldnt help but stop and take a piss on it like the typical little bro KC type that you are. I mean all the typical current popular KC digs on ST Louis sports you plopped down in this thread.
Okay, whatever man. I'm sure you are so right about why St. Louis doesn't have an MLS team. Go ahead and write off my obviously true statements since I am a KC fan. Doesn't bother me any, just don't try and root for KC teams.
This post was edited on 6/19/15 at 1:21 pm
Posted on 6/19/15 at 1:32 pm to 5thTiger
quote:
I'm sure you are so right about why St. Louis doesn't have an MLS team.
I am right.
quote:
Go ahead and write off my obviously true statements since I am a KC fan.
Lets look at your "true" statements
quote:
Maybe if your city would stop jerking off to the cardinals so much, the MLS would give you a team. Garber clearly wants to, and you haven't given a reason to.
quote:
St. Louis is full on behind the cards...and the Blues too I guess. They have neglected the Rams, and thus, Stan Kroenke is preparing to move the team. With results like that, of course ownership would be wary of dropping a sizable investment on a MLS team that might not get the support.
It's not a little brother thing, its the facts of business. If I'm a businessman, I'm sure as heck not putting 300 million into the St. Louis market that doesn't support 3 big teams.
It is a cause and effect type of thing. Because St. Louis has shown that they don't support the Rams, ownership groups are wary to invest. My pointing out the support for the cardinals was simply showing that it is possible for the city to support pro teams, just that they choose not to (rams).
Some riveting "true" stuff there meat. There isnt really one ounce of "truth" to what you are saying outside of betraying your little brother complex and proving you dont know what you are talking about.
quote:
Doesn't bother me any, just don't try and root for KC teams.
If this doesnt scream "little brother" I dont know what does.
I have probably been to more SKC/Wizards games than you have.This post was edited on 6/19/15 at 1:35 pm
Posted on 6/19/15 at 1:37 pm to kilo
Sounds like we got a cat fight just next to the meth cooker in Missouri. As you were kitties...
Posted on 6/19/15 at 1:40 pm to kilo
I'm not going to dignify a response, as you didn't bother to recognize any the points about potential investors being scared off.
I an say with almost certainty that this is false. My family has had season tickets since the MLS's inception .
quote:
I have probably been to more SKC/Wizards games than you have
I an say with almost certainty that this is false. My family has had season tickets since the MLS's inception .
Posted on 6/19/15 at 2:21 pm to Broski
quote:
Congrats on your support of women's soccer?
Unlike Landon...they are on a team at the WC, and winning.
Posted on 6/19/15 at 2:27 pm to CptBengal
I'm surprised Columbus wasn't on that list.
Posted on 6/19/15 at 2:56 pm to CptBengal
quote:
Unlike Landon...they are on a team at the WC, and winning.
meh haven't won a WC since 99
Posted on 6/19/15 at 7:28 pm to StraightCashHomey21
So they've won one...
Posted on 6/19/15 at 7:46 pm to StraightCashHomey21
quote:
meh haven't won a WC since 99
They won the most recent Olympic tournament, which is basically the same type as the World Cup.
This post was edited on 6/19/15 at 7:47 pm
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News