Started By
Message

re: The "US can't compete because athletes choose other sports" Argument

Posted on 12/16/14 at 3:10 pm to
Posted by PeepleHeppinBidness
Manchester United Fan
Member since Oct 2013
3553 posts
Posted on 12/16/14 at 3:10 pm to
quote:

Another false premise in that you assume that we can ONLY be as athletic as other teams. We have access to BETTER athletes.


The U.S. has never lost a game because the other team was more athletic than us. Athleticism is not the issue.
Posted by BleedPurpleGold
New Orleans
Member since Apr 2005
18917 posts
Posted on 12/16/14 at 3:12 pm to
quote:

The U.S. has never lost a game because the other team was more athletic than us. Athleticism is not the issue.


Just off the top of my head, I can't name a single country we've faced that was more athletic than we were. The United States is probably the most athletic and conditioned team on the planet.

It means absolute shite.
Posted by StraightCashHomey21
Aberdeen,NC
Member since Jul 2009
125398 posts
Posted on 12/16/14 at 3:12 pm to
quote:

It has been happening for decades in our country and in England and Scotland.


shite the best athletes in the UK and Ireland play rugby anyway
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
36311 posts
Posted on 12/16/14 at 3:14 pm to
quote:

Just off the top of my head, I can't name a single country we've faced that was more athletic than we were.


Maybe Belgium, but only because they had the technique to express their atleticism. And we still had the best athletes on the field by a mile.
Posted by Ex-Popcorn
Member since Nov 2005
2127 posts
Posted on 12/16/14 at 3:18 pm to
quote:

No, I'm presuming the things that make them good at American sports are their pure athleticism. Because the majority of American sports utilize pure athleticism. Whoever runs the fastest, hits the hardest, jumps the highest is predisposed to succeed in the sports we like. Will they always succeed? Or course not. But those are by far the most important traits to a successful NBA or NFL player.


this is just flat wrong and shows a demonstrable misappreciation of what separates athletes at the highest level.
Posted by BleedPurpleGold
New Orleans
Member since Apr 2005
18917 posts
Posted on 12/16/14 at 3:19 pm to
quote:

Maybe Belgium, but only because they had the technique to express their atleticism. And we still had the best athletes on the field by a mile.


That was honestly the only team that popped into my mind, but I still think our midfield could easily outmuscle them. Not that it mattered.....
Posted by Broski
Member since Jun 2011
70855 posts
Posted on 12/16/14 at 3:19 pm to
quote:

Ex-Popcorn


What you don't understand is that there is different type of "best athlete" for each sport.

You're throwing out all of these basketball players and many of them aren't built to play soccer.
Posted by Ex-Popcorn
Member since Nov 2005
2127 posts
Posted on 12/16/14 at 3:20 pm to
quote:

What makes you think that America could do better than England? Or Norway? Or Sweden? Or France? Or the Netherlands?


Umm...perhaps a player pool larger than all of them put together? Just spitballin' here...
Posted by BleedPurpleGold
New Orleans
Member since Apr 2005
18917 posts
Posted on 12/16/14 at 3:21 pm to
quote:

this is just flat wrong and shows a demonstrable misappreciation of what separates athletes at the highest level.


Really? Because the NFL combine tests their awareness, intellect, touch and vision? Please.
Posted by Ex-Popcorn
Member since Nov 2005
2127 posts
Posted on 12/16/14 at 3:24 pm to
quote:

Just off the top of my head, I can't name a single country we've faced that was more athletic than we were. The United States is probably the most athletic and conditioned team on the planet.

It means absolute shite.



No...I think you are missing the point. I've said it in at least 10 posts. Your argument is that we need to fix something that cannot be fixed. In other words, you are saying that these other teams are better than us because of youth development and training. What you are missing from my argument is that we will never be on the same footing as those countries.

So, having the same level of athlete will always lead to the results. We have access to better athletes (larger pool, better percentage chance of hitting on them) who can help cover for the training and youth development gap that will never be bridged.

This is a reality. Yet, most of you are just saying: Screw athleticism, we need to fix youth development and training. Yeah...ok. Let's go for world peace while we're at it...
Posted by Ex-Popcorn
Member since Nov 2005
2127 posts
Posted on 12/16/14 at 3:26 pm to
quote:

Because the NFL combine tests their awareness, intellect, touch and vision? Please.


lol...it does, jackass. There's a reason they take the wonderlic. You can't be this dense. You really think it's just chance that a guy like Chris Paul leads the league in assists every year??
Posted by Broski
Member since Jun 2011
70855 posts
Posted on 12/16/14 at 3:27 pm to
quote:

There's a reason they take the wonderlic


So what does it say, then, that some of lowest wonderlic scores are still in the NFL?
Posted by BleedPurpleGold
New Orleans
Member since Apr 2005
18917 posts
Posted on 12/16/14 at 3:28 pm to
quote:

What you are missing from my argument is that we will never be on the same footing as those countries.


What makes you come to this conclusion? Because I think your "resources" argument would actually support the idea that as a country, we have the money, vision, and ability to revamp our youth system to be on the same level as other countries, and therefore develop a more skilled and technical player.
Posted by StraightCashHomey21
Aberdeen,NC
Member since Jul 2009
125398 posts
Posted on 12/16/14 at 3:29 pm to
Hell I'll share my own story on soccer development.

I played for 12 years. A few of them at a high level. The dc area can be argued as the best area in the states developing soccer players and the most competitive youth leagues.

I was that kid in the local house league at 8 and 9 scoring 4 goals a game just using my pace to beat everyone and a good finish touch. At all star tournaments I was having travel/select coaching recruiting me and having ODP telling me to come out. Once I started playing travel at 10 that pace didn't mean shite bc I didnt have those coached instincts that kids who been playing travel ball 3 years longer than me had. We had multiple coaches tell my parents to get me in high level training to help me develop my game. Knowing what I know now I wish I got the proper training.

But no I played fricking baseball which stunted my growth as a soccer player. Along with the coaches son breaking my leg in practice then him cutting me. Which was hilarious bc his kid didnt make the HS team. By HS time I pretty much knew my chance was gone so I just played for fun. Thing is I never lost my touch and ability to send a ball. Even at 29 and not playing for 4 years due to military bouncing around I played this year and could still drop a ball on the dime and place a free kick like a boss. Stuff like that is natural.

So basically its not about being the best athlete its about high level training from good coaches at a young age so you can play instinctively. To many times you see with american kids them trying to think to much out there or their brain getting crossed up. The athletic levels are fine its about developing that soccer brain and touch.
Posted by BleedPurpleGold
New Orleans
Member since Apr 2005
18917 posts
Posted on 12/16/14 at 3:30 pm to
quote:

There's a reason they take the wonderlic.




You have seen the scores of these right? Who's being dense now?

quote:

You really think it's just chance that a guy like Chris Paul leads the league in assists every year??


No I don't. But how many players are Paul's size and have his awareness and vision? He is the exception, not the rule. You keep cherry picking players like Chris and Yaya to make your point when they are FAR from the norm in their respective sports.
Posted by WarSlamEagle
Manchester United Fan
Member since Sep 2011
24611 posts
Posted on 12/16/14 at 3:30 pm to
quote:

This is a reality. Yet, most of you are just saying: Screw athleticism, we need to fix youth development and training. Yeah...ok. Let's go for world peace while we're at it...

The countries who have become better at soccer in the last couple of decades did it through youth development, though, not just by becoming more athletic. It's how Belgium started pumping out world-class prospects.
This post was edited on 12/16/14 at 3:32 pm
Posted by StraightCashHomey21
Aberdeen,NC
Member since Jul 2009
125398 posts
Posted on 12/16/14 at 3:31 pm to
quote:

The countries who have become better at soccer in the last couple of decades did it through youth development, though, not just by becoming more athletic.



Looks and points to Belgium
Posted by Ex-Popcorn
Member since Nov 2005
2127 posts
Posted on 12/16/14 at 3:31 pm to
quote:

What makes you come to this conclusion? Because I think your "resources" argument would actually support the idea that as a country, we have the money, vision, and ability to revamp our youth system to be on the same level as other countries, and therefore develop a more skilled and technical player.


Because it's not our culture, honestly. Parents in America want their children to try everything. And the kids want to play what they see glamorized in their real life. In other words, if it's not "cool" to the kids to devote their childhood to soccer training to the exclusion of other sports, then it's not going to happen.
Posted by BleedPurpleGold
New Orleans
Member since Apr 2005
18917 posts
Posted on 12/16/14 at 3:33 pm to
Its been the fastest growing youth sport for like 4 years now. Its the fastest growing spectator sport for young adults. The trend is on the up. Will it ever reach NFL levels? Of course not. But there is enough interest and money there to level the playing field.
Posted by StraightCashHomey21
Aberdeen,NC
Member since Jul 2009
125398 posts
Posted on 12/16/14 at 3:34 pm to
quote:

Because it's not our culture, honestly. Parents in America want their children to try everything.


I agree

to become an elite soccer player take serious commitment from a young age. Its not like football where some random kid from africa or eastern europe shows up and can beast it from the HS level.
Jump to page
Page First 8 9 10 11 12 13
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 10 of 13Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram