Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Is goal differential the first tie breaker in all forms of soccer?

Posted on 6/22/14 at 10:43 pm
Posted by barry
Location, Location, Location
Member since Aug 2006
50337 posts
Posted on 6/22/14 at 10:43 pm
Seems a bit silly to have that over head to head
This post was edited on 6/22/14 at 10:44 pm
Posted by joey barton
Member since Feb 2011
11468 posts
Posted on 6/22/14 at 10:44 pm to
La Liga is head to head first
Posted by hendersonshands
Univ. of Louisiana Ragin Cajuns
Member since Oct 2007
160104 posts
Posted on 6/22/14 at 10:45 pm to
Pretty much. Goal differential is usually the best way to determine who was better throughout the event, considering all teams play each other.
Posted by Toby Flenderson
Scranton, PA
Member since Jan 2014
468 posts
Posted on 6/22/14 at 10:47 pm to
Champions League and the Euro league are the only other tournaments that use groups that I can think of and yes goal difference is the first tie breaker. Then away goals come into play which is nonexistent in the World Cup for obvious reasons
Posted by barry
Location, Location, Location
Member since Aug 2006
50337 posts
Posted on 6/22/14 at 10:52 pm to
Just seems like it would favor a more aggressive style or situation versus head-to-head. In a World Cup format if the tiebreaker comes down to the head-to-head then you know when those two teams played each other both of them had something to play for and neither of them had a layup so that wouldn't affect the outcome of the head-to-head
Posted by TheWalrus
Member since Dec 2012
40408 posts
Posted on 6/22/14 at 11:03 pm to
For many of my youth tournaments, goals against was the first tiebreaker. Why? So teams wouldn't have incentive to pile on goals against horrible teams.

And for many, the scoring system was as follows. Teams could score a max of ten pts per game

6 pts for a win
3 pts for a tie
1 pt each for each goal up to 3
1 pt for a shutout

It was a great system for youth soccer.
Posted by Golfer
Member since Nov 2005
75052 posts
Posted on 6/22/14 at 11:13 pm to
quote:

Pretty much. Goal differential is usually the best way to determine who was better throughout the event, considering all teams play each other.


But group play isn't consistent. Because as the last game approaches, the outcomes vary greatly by each team.

So if team A needs a win vs team B plus 3 goals to advance over team C and team C has already been eliminated or is locked into their seed to advance, A's opportunity to score 3 goals is greater.

This is all while team C has beaten A head to head and is playing team D that is fighting to advance as well.
Posted by Sleazy E
Member since Jan 2014
1768 posts
Posted on 6/22/14 at 11:27 pm to
Head to head should be the tie breaker in all sports. It's the logical way of determining team placement.
Posted by kieper89
Tottenham Hotspur Fan
Member since Dec 2011
353 posts
Posted on 6/23/14 at 12:32 am to
quote:

Head to head should be the tie breaker in all sports. It's the logical way of determining team placement.


It's not about who is the best in one single game, it's about who is the best over the three group games. Head to head works in other sports because in Baseball, and football you don't play the same teams as everyone in your division for example the Saints may play the Cowboys one year while the Falcons may play Washington.

In soccer: In the World Cup groups,club tournaments, and most actual leagues around the world. Everyone plays the same teams at least once or twice sometime three maybe four times in the smaller leagues so Goal Differential is a view on how a team did over a competition rather than just one game.
Posted by Golfer
Member since Nov 2005
75052 posts
Posted on 6/23/14 at 1:33 am to
quote:

It's not about who is the best in one single game, it's about who is the best over the three group games.


Again, that's fine if the circumstances are the same for each game.
Posted by barry
Location, Location, Location
Member since Aug 2006
50337 posts
Posted on 6/23/14 at 7:17 am to
quote:

It's not about who is the best in one single game


I agree, but when two teams have the same amount of points then I don't think goal differential is a good way to determine the better performance because the point is to win games, not score goals.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
421612 posts
Posted on 6/23/14 at 7:40 am to
quote:

Just seems like it would favor a more aggressive style

well...aggression is good, but being aggressive in soccer leaves you open to counters (which the US saw yesterday)

quote:

In a World Cup format if the tiebreaker comes down to the head-to-head then you know when those two teams played each other both of them had something to play for and neither of them had a layup so that wouldn't affect the outcome of the head-to-head

2 problems:

1. the likelihood of ties screws this up
2. situational gameplans are common in soccer. like if the US won yesterday, we would have rested a bunch of guys b/c we had little to play for. the H2H wouldn't tell the whole story
Posted by TN Bhoy
San Antonio, TX
Member since Apr 2010
60589 posts
Posted on 6/23/14 at 7:42 am to
quote:

Again, that's fine if the circumstances are the same for each game.


That's why it's not head to head. They don't want a one-off to wreck the tournament.

Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
421612 posts
Posted on 6/23/14 at 7:42 am to
quote:

Head to head should be the tie breaker in all sports. It's the logical way of determining team placement.

meh

in a group-based system with arbitrary points rewarded for ties/wins, it's really not

goal differential gives you a much better idea of how you played over the entire group stage

soccer is not a sport that lends itself to "one/done" formats. that is why the FA cup always has crazy teams left at the end
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
421612 posts
Posted on 6/23/14 at 7:43 am to
quote:

Again, that's fine if the circumstances are the same for each game.

that argument works for either of the sides, so it really isn't a strong argument either way
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
421612 posts
Posted on 6/23/14 at 7:44 am to
quote:

because the point is to win games

or tie

quote:

not score goals.

again, you have to conceptualize life with ties
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram