Started By
Message
locked post

WTF - Why postpose the protests if they had NO relation to the murders?

Posted on 12/22/14 at 3:05 pm
Posted by ChineseBandit58
Pearland, TX
Member since Aug 2005
42628 posts
Posted on 12/22/14 at 3:05 pm
Why is Blasio now asking to postpone the protests? The reigning meme is that they are entirely irrelevant to the actions of some random mentally disturbed individual.

IF the protesters have a legitimate gripe why is their freedom of speech being curtailed?

This doesn't make sense.

Either the protests area related or they are not.

Why doesn't Blasio recommend stopping Christmas sales until after the funerals? They are unrelated too.

To me this is clear admission that they know they have stepped in a big ol pile of hot dog shite.
Posted by mtntiger
Asheville, NC
Member since Oct 2003
26642 posts
Posted on 12/22/14 at 3:06 pm to
quote:

To me this is clear admission that they know they have stepped in a big ol pile of hot dog shite.


Uhhhh, yep.
Posted by LSU0358
Member since Jan 2005
7918 posts
Posted on 12/22/14 at 3:09 pm to
quote:

To me this is clear admission that they know they have stepped in a big ol pile of hot dog shite.



Uhhhh, yep.



No reasonable person can associate the two events, but de Blasio is in CYA mode because of the public pissing match with the police union. He could have made much more of an impact by altering the tone of his public comments following Garner death and non-indictment.
Posted by efrad
Member since Nov 2007
18645 posts
Posted on 12/22/14 at 3:11 pm to
quote:

WTF - Why postpose the protests if they had NO relation to the murders?


Politics.
Posted by Radiojones
The Twilight Zone
Member since Feb 2007
10728 posts
Posted on 12/22/14 at 3:13 pm to
quote:

No reasonable person can associate the two events



Are you still beating your wife?
Posted by ballscaster
Member since Jun 2013
26861 posts
Posted on 12/22/14 at 3:15 pm to
quote:

Why is Blasio now asking to postpone the protests?
A combination of politics and sensitivity that, sadly, is weighted too much in favor of the former, if you ask me.
quote:

The reigning meme is that they are entirely irrelevant to the actions of some random mentally disturbed individual.
And it is correct.
quote:

To me this is clear admission that they know they have stepped in a big ol pile of hot dog shite.

He has stepped in a big ol pile of hot dog shite. That does not mean he is at all responsible for a prick killing two cops.

Those who persist in connecting politics to two murders are just as sick in the head as those who connected Palin to Giffords.
Posted by PsychTiger
Member since Jul 2004
99074 posts
Posted on 12/22/14 at 3:15 pm to
quote:

Are you still beating your wife?


That would be his hand. You can't associate the actions of his hand with him. They are totally unrelated.
Posted by Lsupimp
Ersatz Amerika-97.6% phony & fake
Member since Nov 2003
78666 posts
Posted on 12/22/14 at 3:16 pm to
quote:

No reasonable person can associate the two events


Kill that go over there.
Kill him.
Go ahead, you heard me.
*Man is killed.
Wait. Somebody killed that guy?
Who said anything about killing a guy?
You suck for pointing out that we said to kill that guy.
That guy getting killed had nothing to do with anything I said.
Wow those guys are batshit crazy for remembering when we said to kill that guy, huh?
Posted by ballscaster
Member since Jun 2013
26861 posts
Posted on 12/22/14 at 3:18 pm to
quote:

That guy getting killed had nothing to do with anything I said.

This
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
98860 posts
Posted on 12/22/14 at 3:20 pm to
quote:

To me this is clear admission that they know they have stepped in a big ol pile of hot dog shite.


Posted by Pettifogger
Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone
Member since Feb 2012
79235 posts
Posted on 12/22/14 at 3:22 pm to
quote:

Those who persist in connecting politics to two murders are just as sick in the head as those who connected Palin to Giffords.



FFS no.

I don't blame politics or protests for the murders, but they're at least on the same subject.

The Gifford shooting had nothing, at all, to do with Palin. It was a false report.
Posted by mmcgrath
Indianapolis
Member since Feb 2010
35406 posts
Posted on 12/22/14 at 3:38 pm to
quote:

IF the protesters have a legitimate gripe why is their freedom of speech being curtailed?
No one is curtailing free speech. He made a request. Since the police have to monitor / support protests and they are amped up right now, it is prob a good idea to let things cool down a bit.

But keep grasping at straws. This must be like an early Christmas for you and some others on this board.
Posted by ballscaster
Member since Jun 2013
26861 posts
Posted on 12/22/14 at 3:39 pm to
quote:

I don't blame politics or protests for the murders,
Some do. They are sick.
Posted by Pettifogger
Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone
Member since Feb 2012
79235 posts
Posted on 12/22/14 at 3:41 pm to
quote:

Some do. They are sick.



I know. But I think blaming someone and a subject totally unrelated is more dangerous than blaming the subject that was legitimately related to the incident in question, hence my focus on the accurate portrayal of Gifford.

Posted by Lsupimp
Ersatz Amerika-97.6% phony & fake
Member since Nov 2003
78666 posts
Posted on 12/22/14 at 4:02 pm to
Is this the part of the thread where liberals pretend they don't know the difference between being PERSONALLY RESPONSIBLE (pulling the trigger) for something and HAVING MORALLY CUPABABILITY (What do we want? Dead Cops! When do we want it? Now!)?

Moral Complicity means moral complicity.
It doesn't mean personal responsibility.

(REALLY SHITTY METAPHOR ALERT)---I am morally COMPLICIT for spreading shitty music because I have a disco ball and Bee Gees LP in my living room. I'm not PERSONALLY RESPONSIBLE for the Bee Gees.
Posted by ChineseBandit58
Pearland, TX
Member since Aug 2005
42628 posts
Posted on 12/22/14 at 4:07 pm to
quote:

That does not mean he is at all responsible for a prick killing two cops.


I think he shares in the responsibility.

when I first heard the "What do we want = DEAD COPS" chants I said to my wife = "some idiot is going to kill a cop if they don't put a stop to this NOW."

Well, Blasio didn't say one word about that atrocity - in fact he continue to fuel the fire of the protests = that the police dept needed "retraining" to prevent such events.

Blasio never did one thing to damp the intensity of the protests. He never did one thing to support HIS police dept who were out enforcing HIS statutes. He never did one thing to address the underlying misrepresentations on the protests - in fact he embraced the misrepresentations. He never did one thing to support the Grand Jury process - a process that is the backbone of our justice system.

In fact he could have done a lot to PREVENT this situation from becoming such a outrageous pit of hatred for policemen in general.

He is the mayor of the city. He is the head of the police dept. He could have done a LOT to nip this crap in the bud. to the extent that he not only did nothing to put ut the fire, but actually fanned the flames, yes - he shares responsibility for the fire getting totally out of control.
Posted by socraticsilence
Member since Dec 2013
1347 posts
Posted on 12/22/14 at 4:16 pm to
quote:



Kill that go over there.
Kill him.
Go ahead, you heard me.
*Man is killed.
Wait. Somebody killed that guy?
Who said anything about killing a guy?
You suck for pointing out that we said to kill that guy.
That guy getting killed had nothing to do with anything I said.
Wow those guys are bat shite crazy for remembering when we said to kill that guy, huh?


So basically you're saying this is the same as when the couple left the riot in Nevada and gunned down two cops?
Posted by socraticsilence
Member since Dec 2013
1347 posts
Posted on 12/22/14 at 4:18 pm to
quote:



FFS no.

I don't blame politics or protests for the murders, but they're at least on the same subject.

The Gifford shooting had nothing, at all, to do with Palin. It was a false report


Right, this much, much more like the tea party being morally culpable for the murders of the cops in Nevada.
Posted by ballscaster
Member since Jun 2013
26861 posts
Posted on 12/22/14 at 5:04 pm to
quote:

I think he shares in the responsibility.
You are wrong, and it is sick and disrespectful of the families of the dead for you to politicize it in this way. Not reading the rest of your misguided post.
This post was edited on 12/22/14 at 5:05 pm
Posted by Lsupimp
Ersatz Amerika-97.6% phony & fake
Member since Nov 2003
78666 posts
Posted on 12/22/14 at 5:15 pm to
quote:

it is sick and disrespectful of the families of the dead for you to politicize it in this way


Ummm....
You might want to check in with the family of Officer Ramos.
Because I just heard his Aunt call Mayor De Blasio "disgraceful".
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram