- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Who here would accept a carve-out for rape, health, or “quality of life”?
Posted on 6/27/22 at 6:45 pm
Posted on 6/27/22 at 6:45 pm
The pro-abortion crowd always throws these exceptions out there as justification for abortion.
If a much stricter ban on the practice required carve outs for rape (contingent on charges being filed), health of mother or baby (contingent on signatures of one or more doctors), or some issue of “quality of BABY’S life” (chronic, debilitating, fatal disease), would you accept those as “justifications” in order to get the reduction overall?
If a much stricter ban on the practice required carve outs for rape (contingent on charges being filed), health of mother or baby (contingent on signatures of one or more doctors), or some issue of “quality of BABY’S life” (chronic, debilitating, fatal disease), would you accept those as “justifications” in order to get the reduction overall?
This post was edited on 6/27/22 at 6:47 pm
43
Posted on 6/27/22 at 6:47 pm to Ag Zwin
They already exist.
Posted on 6/27/22 at 6:47 pm to Ag Zwin
Nope.
Posted on 6/27/22 at 6:47 pm to Ag Zwin
those questions should be answered by the survivors of those 'exceptions'
This post was edited on 6/27/22 at 6:48 pm
Posted on 6/27/22 at 6:48 pm to Ag Zwin
Not I. It’s murder.
Posted on 6/27/22 at 6:48 pm to Ag Zwin
These exemptions are less than 3% of abortions.
97% of abortions are for convenience
97% of abortions are for convenience
Posted on 6/27/22 at 6:49 pm to Ag Zwin
your bloodlust is pathetic
no exceptions in order to murder babies is ever ok
tell us one exception, that they wont lie about, and falsely claim, just to justify them killing a baby for convenience?
no exceptions in order to murder babies is ever ok
tell us one exception, that they wont lie about, and falsely claim, just to justify them killing a baby for convenience?
Posted on 6/27/22 at 6:51 pm to Ag Zwin
Who here would accept a carve-out for rape, health, or “quality of life”
Sure, all of those or justifiable reasons to kill a child.
Sure, all of those or justifiable reasons to kill a child.
Posted on 6/27/22 at 6:55 pm to Ag Zwin
We shouldn’t sentence babies to death for the actions of their father.
You can find any number of babies who were predicted to have defects which did not materialize. We shouldn’t euthanize babies before they’re born anymore than after they’re born because we think they won’t appreciate the life they have, even if it may be short.
Pregnancies that threaten the life of the mother aren’t an elective abortion. If the baby will die without the mother, then there’s no way for the baby to continue to develop. If the baby has a chance to live apart from the mother, then the baby can be delivered to save the mother and care can be given to the baby and it’ll survive or it won’t. Either way, there’s no reason to murder the baby without giving it a chance to survive.
You can find any number of babies who were predicted to have defects which did not materialize. We shouldn’t euthanize babies before they’re born anymore than after they’re born because we think they won’t appreciate the life they have, even if it may be short.
Pregnancies that threaten the life of the mother aren’t an elective abortion. If the baby will die without the mother, then there’s no way for the baby to continue to develop. If the baby has a chance to live apart from the mother, then the baby can be delivered to save the mother and care can be given to the baby and it’ll survive or it won’t. Either way, there’s no reason to murder the baby without giving it a chance to survive.
Posted on 6/27/22 at 6:57 pm to Ag Zwin
Life of the mother is about the only exception I would support.
Posted on 6/27/22 at 6:58 pm to Ag Zwin
quote:
If a much stricter ban on the practice required carve outs for rape (contingent on charges being filed)
Millions of women are raped by people the women cannot identify, how dare you.
Posted on 6/27/22 at 7:01 pm to LRB1967
quote:
Life of the mother is about the only exception I would support.
i could back that if it was the doctors decision, and made while the woman was on the table where a doctor had to risk his medical license for life if he couldnt medically back up the mother would die if he didnt abort the child, and that the child could not be saved to live on its own after it was removed.
This post was edited on 6/27/22 at 7:11 pm
Posted on 6/27/22 at 7:11 pm to Ag Zwin
Either it is a human life or it isn't. You can't morally justify rape and incest exemptions if it is a human life.
If it isn't a human life (which it is) then ok abortion is acceptable. But since it IS scientifically a human life it isn't OK to kill a kid for something someone else did that was illegal (rape).
The crime has already been committed (rape incest). You can not undo the crime. Exemptions are the highest form of hypocrisy.
If it isn't a human life (which it is) then ok abortion is acceptable. But since it IS scientifically a human life it isn't OK to kill a kid for something someone else did that was illegal (rape).
The crime has already been committed (rape incest). You can not undo the crime. Exemptions are the highest form of hypocrisy.
Posted on 6/27/22 at 7:23 pm to Jack Bauers HnK
quote:
Jack Bauers HnK
Well said sir
Posted on 6/27/22 at 8:01 pm to keakar
quote:
could back that if it was the doctors decision, and made while the woman was on the table where a doctor had to risk his medical license for life if he couldnt medically back up the mother would die if he didnt abort the child, and that the child could not be saved to live on its own after it was removed.
In that situation, you remove the baby. If it can't survive, it can't. That's not abortion, it's a life-saving procedure.
Posted on 6/27/22 at 8:05 pm to Ag Zwin
We think the false tape accusations are bad now…. Wait till rape is one of the only reasons someone has to continue murdering a baby. Every body getting accused
Posted on 6/27/22 at 8:06 pm to Ag Zwin
They did that and look at how far they took it. Our govt and politicians bowed down to the left time and time again. It has to be tighter controls or we will be back here again.
Posted on 6/27/22 at 8:10 pm to Ag Zwin
I would agree to a rape/incest carve-out but only if the woman assists police and agrees to testify against the accused.
Posted on 6/27/22 at 8:11 pm to Ag Zwin
I did. No longer.
1. Everything should be done to keep the life of both mother and baby.
2. Incest is pretty damn rare.
3. We already have an issue with women claiming rape after consensual sex. This will only exacerbate it
1. Everything should be done to keep the life of both mother and baby.
2. Incest is pretty damn rare.
3. We already have an issue with women claiming rape after consensual sex. This will only exacerbate it
Posted on 6/27/22 at 8:15 pm to mouton
quote:
They already exist.
Not in Alabama
Page 1 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News