re: When did social studies become a science?

Social Studies isn't a science.

Neither is psychology.

They both attempt to be somewhat scientific in their approach.

That's fine. But they aren't sciences.

quote:

---

Psychology in studying mental health and the individual has lost out to psychiatry and medicine . When people have mental illness medicine is the way to treat it.

All psychologists do now is take surveys or polls and come up with findings of polls and surveys. They claim to be a science but in studying the individual they are not a science and in studying society their findings are useless.

---

So you clearly don't know what you're talking about.

quote:

---

I really don't care what you think of my definition.

---

That's a leftist argument. "It's my definition, and it's personal; that's all that matters."

quote:

---

I'm not saying they aren't learning things with their studies. They are.

---

But that's what science is; experiments are one part of science.

quote:

---

They just always take their conclusions too far.

---

Usual that's politicians or some random person with an agenda. It's just like climatic change; others hijack it.

Sociology is not a true science. True science involves the use of the scientific method: forming a hypothesis, testing it, and making a conclusion on it (to put it in concise format). Sociology is the study of human culture. Sociologists call themselves scientists, but what they fail to comprehend is that they can't reliably test their hypotheses. Sociologists only use surveys to perform their "tests", and anyone with an actual science background or who's even filled out a survey can tell you that they should not constitute science, and surveys are not reliable information. Sociologists accept surveys as their form of scientific testing, but people are inherently biased, frequently confused about reality and prone to purposefully lieing. Surveys aren't reliable forms of testing, and so the whole basis of sociology being testable is incorrect. It's just a way for liberal professors to act like their work matters

quote:

---

Neither comes close to meeting this description.

---

I should preface that this is personal since my PhD is in psychology. And I'm well aware of the scientific limitations of studying human behavior, but I spent (and continue to) years learning how to systematically observe and study, and whenever possible, test the concepts and theories of my specific disciplinep.

I understand that, compared to the hard sciences, social science in general is inferior. That doesn't make them pervasively unscientific.

In addition, I hate that some researchers and disciplines are arguing "theories" with limited, or no, true scientific scrutiny. Psychology alone has 54 divisions, and some are essentially pure quantitative and/or experimental in nature, and focus on observable and measurable behaviors. On the other hand, others focus on abstract, purely conjecture-based concepts. The latter's unscientific focus doesn't negate the former's though.

So when you make a sweeping generalization that psychology is not a science, I have a personal and professional problem with that.