- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 4/3/17 at 11:09 am to Tiger n Miami AU83
It may not be necessarily illegal, but it does paint her as an absolute liar.
Just two weeks ago she was blathering on about how she knew nothing of this unmasking business and that it was nonsense for the Trump administration to pander.
Hopefully she comes out of hiding and tries to clarify so that she can be further humiliated and shamed into irrelevance- again.
Just two weeks ago she was blathering on about how she knew nothing of this unmasking business and that it was nonsense for the Trump administration to pander.
Hopefully she comes out of hiding and tries to clarify so that she can be further humiliated and shamed into irrelevance- again.
Posted on 4/3/17 at 11:19 am to Decatur
quote:
Decatur
Yes, why the unmasking? Do you really need to unmask Trump's people? Is Rice so stupid that she couldn't find out who these people are without unmasking them? Why release to the media? If they had anything real on Trump, none of the secretly releasing stuff is necessary. The unmasking was purely political.
If the Obama administration had ANYTHING on Trump's administration, you can bet your arse it would be front and center for all to see. It wouldn't be this Russia, Russia, Russian BS with nothing to show for it. Nobody gave a frick about Russian until Hillary and the Dems got they asses beat. They needed an excuse for Hillary's loss and a way to undermine Trump, so Russia is what they went with.
Posted on 4/3/17 at 11:33 am to Decatur
quote:
What were Trump campaign/transition officials mixed up in that necessitated unmasking? by Decatur
Being the opposition party? Seems to be the case.
Posted on 4/3/17 at 11:35 am to Decatur
quote:White House transition apparently. This has potential to get ugly for your team, Decatur.
What were Trump campaign/transition officials mixed up in that necessitated unmasking?
Posted on 4/3/17 at 11:37 am to Decatur
What was the DNC mixed up in that necessitated Nixon breaking into the Watergate hotel?
Two can play this game.
Two can play this game.
Posted on 4/3/17 at 11:37 am to NYNolaguy1
quote:
it does paint her as an absolute liar.
Like trump but not really as 1 lie hardly compares to the hundreds told by trump in just a couple of months (I can link to lists of hundreds of trump's verifiably false statements since Jan 20th if need be).
Posted on 4/3/17 at 11:38 am to Decatur
quote:
Message
What were Trump campaign/transition officials mixed up in that necessitated unmasking?
Lol.
You're pathetic
Posted on 4/3/17 at 11:40 am to wfallstiger
quote:
Here comes the spin cycle
I said months ago that when it finally was unavoidable that Obama spied on his political opponents, liberals would defend it
That's why they've NEVER said "it isn't true but it would be bad us they did"
Liberals BELIEVE in using the government against their political opponents.
That's been true all over the world for a hundred years
Posted on 4/3/17 at 11:42 am to jamboybarry
quote:Obama was the President and would be involved in who Russian diplomats were talking to, especially when it came to undermining foreign relations / sanctions. Obviously nothing was released that altered the election.
Someone posted it yesterday but I knew the spin from the bootlickers would be "what was "Trump doing so nefariously that Obama's administration had to spy on and illegally leak his information?"
Posted on 4/3/17 at 11:42 am to Langland
quote:
If the Obama administration had ANYTHING on Trump's administration, you can bet your arse it would be front and center for all to see.
I'm glad someone else is seeing this bluff. All they can say is Russia, Russia, Russia, they cannot tell anyone what it is they have on Trump. The best they can do is a minor skin on the wall due to Flynn not telling Pence the whole of his encounter with the Russian Ambassador....lost in all of this is intel officials periodically letting slip that the content of the conversation was not damning.
If this were a Poker game and I had even a moderately winning hand, I would start upping the ante on the pot. Oh, your showing me Sessions...so what that's like a pair of 7's? I'll raise you a Ben Rhoades. What? a Devin Nunes meeting with Trump officials pertaining to intel? Okay, all in, now put up or shut up!!!! Show me the damning stuff. I'll bet there is another 7 in there, But I've got a pair of Jacks showing
Posted on 4/3/17 at 11:43 am to ShortyRob
One of the great things about the last few years so is that now, liberals openly admit What they are.
Complete totalitarians
Complete totalitarians
Posted on 4/3/17 at 11:45 am to Decatur
This is what happened:
Putin tipped off Team Trump that Obama was surveilling them.
Team Trump had no where to go to report that information. Obama would have denied the accusation and he would have painted Trump as a conspiracy theorist ensuring him losing the election. Furthermore Comey was compromised. He was working on behalf of Obama.
Trump's only way to vindicate he and his team was to goad the Obama administration in, win the election and then expose them.
You are now on the verge of seeing the Obama administration getting exposed.
Putin tipped off Team Trump that Obama was surveilling them.
Team Trump had no where to go to report that information. Obama would have denied the accusation and he would have painted Trump as a conspiracy theorist ensuring him losing the election. Furthermore Comey was compromised. He was working on behalf of Obama.
Trump's only way to vindicate he and his team was to goad the Obama administration in, win the election and then expose them.
You are now on the verge of seeing the Obama administration getting exposed.
Posted on 4/3/17 at 11:51 am to Tiger n Miami AU83
I knew the second I read that part of the Bloomberg opinion piece that drones like you would ignore its facts and obvious implications and cite the editorial bloomberg spin as gospel truth. At least you are predictably consistent.
This post was edited on 4/3/17 at 11:52 am
Posted on 4/3/17 at 11:54 am to mmcgrath
quote:
Obama was the President and would be involved in who Russian diplomats were talking to, especially when it came to undermining foreign relations / sanctions.
And yet all reports indicate this had nothing to do with the russian inquiry so there goes that fig leaf.
Posted on 4/3/17 at 11:58 am to wfallstiger
quote:
The TRUTH question is what was a sitting POTUS mixed up in that necessitated unmasking?????
That IS a legitimate question.
Now, no matter what any American is involved in, leaking that stuff to unauthorized persons is illegal though
Posted on 4/3/17 at 11:59 am to Decatur
quote:
What were Trump campaign/transition officials mixed up in that necessitated unmasking
None of your business without a warrant. If there is concern, a case should be made and approved by a judge - that's how individual freedoms are protected.
Political figures exposing conversations and exploiting them for political purposes are how individual freedoms are abused.
Fwiw - if there was collusion w/Russians, I have no prob with Trump being held accountable. But there's a legal way to do it. Then there's the way the Obama admin went about it.
This post was edited on 4/3/17 at 12:01 pm
Posted on 4/3/17 at 12:00 pm to Decatur
Apparently, they are guilty of being Republican.
Posted on 4/3/17 at 12:03 pm to Decatur
It's called "making shite up." It's what libs do.
Posted on 4/3/17 at 12:08 pm to Tiger n Miami AU83
quote:
quote:
Rice's requests to unmask the names of Trump transition officials does not vindicate Trump's own tweets from March 4 in which he accused Obama of illegally tapping Trump Tower. There remains no evidence to support that claim.
quote:
The standard for senior officials to learn the names of U.S. persons incidentally collected is that it must have some foreign intelligence value, a standard that can apply to almost anything. This suggests Rice's unmasking requests were likely within the law.
Right, she used the law and agencies to spy on a political opponent.
What this boards been saying for weeks.
Or as trump has been saying: watergate level shite
This post was edited on 4/3/17 at 12:11 pm
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News