Started By
Message
locked post

Weight of U.S Regulations – 1.9 trillion

Posted on 6/22/17 at 6:30 pm
Posted by DaBike
Member since Jan 2008
9167 posts
Posted on 6/22/17 at 6:30 pm
quote:

The Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI) released its Ten Thousand Commandments report for 2017, a snapshot of the federal regulatory state and how pervasive the effect of regulation is on our economy. CEI calculated that if federal regulations were a country, it would be the seventh-largest economy in the world, behind India and ahead of Italy. The eye-popping $1.9 trillion cost of regulations are in part a result of Congress delegating far too much rulemaking authority to federal bureaucracies.

Perhaps unsurprisingly both the Department of the Interior and EPA are in the top five most active rule-producing agencies.


quote:

The Weidenbaum Center at Washington University in St. Louis and the George Washington University Regulatory Stud¬ies Center in Washington, D.C., jointly estimate that agencies spent $63 billion in fiscal year 2016 to administer the federal regulatory state. Adding the $1.9 trillion in off-budget compliance costs brings the total reckoned regulatory enterprise to about $1.963 trillion.

If U.S. regulation was a country, it would be the world’s seventh-largest economy, ranking behind India and ahead of Italy.

The estimated cost of regulation is equivalent to half the level of federal spending, which was $3.854 trillion in 2016.

Regulatory costs of $1.9 trillion amount to 10 percent of the U.S. gross domestic product, which was estimated at $18.861 trillion in 2016 by the Com¬merce Department’s Bureau of Economic Analysis.

During calendar year 2016, Congress enacted 214 laws, whereas agencies issued 3,853 rules. Thus, 18 rules were issued for every law enacted. This “Unconstitutionality Index”—the ratio of regulations issued by agencies to laws passed by Congress and signed by the president—highlights the delegation of lawmaking power to unelected agency officials. The average for the past decade has been 27.

If one assumes that all costs of federal regulation and intervention flowed all the way down to households, U.S. households would “pay” $14,809 annually on average in a regulatory hidden tax. That amounts to 21 percent of the average income of $69,629 and 26.45 percent of the expenditure budget of $55,978. The “tax” exceeds every item in the budget except housing. More is “spent” on embedded regulation than on health care, food, transportation, enter¬tainment, and apparel.

Last year, the Obama administration averaged 86 “major” rules, a 36 percent higher average annual output than that of President George W. Bush. President Obama issued 685 major rules during his term, compared with Bush’s 505.



Competitive Enterprise Institute – 10k Commandments
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
69303 posts
Posted on 6/22/17 at 6:34 pm to
What you have to remember is that 1.9 trillion isn't just gone to waste. It employs people, regulators, etc who then spend the money and put it back into the economy
Posted by tiggerthetooth
Big Momma's House
Member since Oct 2010
61270 posts
Posted on 6/22/17 at 6:39 pm to
quote:

What you have to remember is that 1.9 trillion isn't just gone to waste. It employs people, regulators, etc who then spend the money and put it back into the economy


Not all of it. A lot goes to the fed. All this does is perpetuate the growth of the FED and puts that 1.9 trillion in THEIR hands for distribution. People can be employed and NOT be FED employees. We shouldn't have to make up government programs to employ people. The free market should put people in a position to have available jobs.
Posted by FearTheFish
Member since Dec 2007
3759 posts
Posted on 6/22/17 at 6:42 pm to
quote:

All this does is perpetuate the growth of the FED and puts that 1.9 trillion


The people that work for these agencies don't shop at the grocery or buy clothes?
Posted by SoulGlo
Shinin' Through
Member since Dec 2011
17248 posts
Posted on 6/22/17 at 6:43 pm to
That's disgusting.

I don't care what percentage doesn't go to waste' HHM. It is sickening.
Posted by wmr
North of Dickson, South of Herman's
Member since Mar 2009
32518 posts
Posted on 6/22/17 at 6:48 pm to
quote:



The people that work for these agencies don't shop at the grocery or buy clothes?


Most people in the private sector know first hand how wasteful and incompetent government agencies are.

The fewer, the better. They are filled with people who are unemployable elsewhere.
Posted by mtntiger
Asheville, NC
Member since Oct 2003
26640 posts
Posted on 6/22/17 at 6:50 pm to
You have a point, but the bottom line for Joe and Sally is the amount those regulations and the jobs they support drive up the cost of living.

Posted by Bjorn Cyborg
Member since Sep 2016
26776 posts
Posted on 6/22/17 at 7:07 pm to
I hope that is sarcasm.
Posted by Tiguar
Montana
Member since Mar 2012
33131 posts
Posted on 6/22/17 at 7:10 pm to
Yay Keynesian economics
Posted by DaBike
Member since Jan 2008
9167 posts
Posted on 6/22/17 at 7:21 pm to
quote:

What you have to remember is that 1.9 trillion isn't just gone to waste. It employs people, regulators, etc who then spend the money and put it back into the economy


More regulations and higher cost to business and consumers is not what is needed:
- There are too many regulations currently in place for the regulators to enforce and for most business to comply with. Everyone is set up for failure….

- Even with 1.9 trillion the government doesn’t use that money on hiring employees or to help with managing these regulations.
For example the industry I work in agreed to higher permit fess. The additional money was to be specifically used for hiring more regulators. The government has not hired any of the additional employees and has sent the money somewhere else.

- An organization earning 1.9 trillion should be able to pay salaries that could compete with private industry for talent, but that’s not the case. There are great-dedicated government employees but there’s also a lot who don’t understand the industries they regulating.

- There is waste and inefficiencies all over government. Any private business would do more with less and if they didn’t then they go out of business. Private industry can’t just artificially inflate prices when it runs out of money.

Application, enforcement and focus on existing regulations would be a better use of resources. Spending resources on actually managing a budget would also be value adding.

Posted by SoulGlo
Shinin' Through
Member since Dec 2011
17248 posts
Posted on 6/22/17 at 7:26 pm to
quote:

What you have to remember is that 1.9 trillion isn't just gone to waste. It employs people, regulators, etc who then spend the money and put it back into the economy


Yes, the hired goons of the mob also spend money on groceries. We should leave them alone.

The precious regulators perpetuate their own jobs by looking for violations that justify their existence, shaking down those they regulate.
Posted by stuntman
Florida
Member since Jan 2013
9099 posts
Posted on 6/22/17 at 7:27 pm to
quote:

What you have to remember is that 1.9 trillion isn't just gone to waste. It employs people, regulators, etc who then spend the money and put it back into the economy






Posted by narddogg81
Vancouver
Member since Jan 2012
19701 posts
Posted on 6/22/17 at 7:29 pm to
quote:

The people that work for these agencies don't shop at the grocery or buy clothes?
you are misunderstanding what this means. We are not spending 2 trillion on salaries for regulators, probably not more than a couple hundred million for all federal regulators. This stuff is the cost of compliance with the regulations.
Posted by DaBike
Member since Jan 2008
9167 posts
Posted on 6/22/17 at 7:30 pm to
quote:

This stuff is the cost of compliance with the regulations.


Bingo!!!!!
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
98822 posts
Posted on 6/22/17 at 7:32 pm to
To Trump's credit, this is one area where he is busting arse and getting results.
Posted by skullhawk
My house
Member since Nov 2007
23048 posts
Posted on 6/22/17 at 7:34 pm to
It's a charade to employ folks.

USDOE gives states $0.11 for every $1.00 they spend to support federal education initiatives. States, on average, spend $0.14 for every dollar spent to comply with federal regulations. Just about every state would be in a better fiscal position without the federal money at all.

I'm sure this same thing applies to other agencies but I have direct knowledge of this particular one.
Posted by deltaland
Member since Mar 2011
90620 posts
Posted on 6/22/17 at 7:53 pm to
quote:

you have to remember is that 1.9 trillion isn't just gone to waste. It employs people, regulators, etc who then spend the money and put it back into the economy



If it was kept in private hands it would still be spent and create more jobs
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
67937 posts
Posted on 6/22/17 at 8:08 pm to
Regulations are hidden taxes.

When Trump is cutting regulations, he's cutting taxes.

Bet you didn't know we already have tax cuts thanks to our God-Emperor.
Posted by TupeloTiger
Tupelo,Ms.[via Bastrop,La.]
Member since Jul 2004
4340 posts
Posted on 6/22/17 at 8:31 pm to
These Obama era regulations are ALL unnecessary and expensive. It puts our money on requirements and not on employees or inventory. It HURTS Blacks, women, and young people's employment. One day in 2009 an Obama D. of Agriculture bureaucrat walked in one of our stores and said we had to be correct on the weight of hamburger meat for sale and not charge more for less meat. We have weighing equipment/scales and can not do that, plus, we don't want to. WE HAD to buy a Telzon gun for $2500 and total up all of our Daily meat and send in a total each day,7 days a week, or we'd be fined thousands. It costs time, labor, forms/paperwork to send it in. Who reads it, 50 states, thousands of stores. A total waste. And the little guy down the street sells beer and cigarettes for food stamps. Another Federal guy walked in and said We use too much electricity on lights in the front of the store ,that are plugged into the wall plugs. Been there for years. We HAD to hire an electrician to run a new and separate electrical line with a new breaker box to the front of the store for those lights, or be fined. Always a threat. We had to spend $3000 to do that, if we had the money or not. Had to. Also, We had Sale/Special signs in OUR PARKING LOT that a DOTD Fed. guy told us we had to move our signs off the Right of Way and further away from the street. The right of way was about 5 feet into our parking lot. They measured it and told us to move it back. It had to go next to the building where it did not help sales. They didn't care about our business at all. Didn't they have something better to do for the public. You wonder how Trump won and the Obama Democrats lost. It's crap like that.
This post was edited on 6/22/17 at 8:51 pm
Posted by DaBike
Member since Jan 2008
9167 posts
Posted on 6/22/17 at 8:50 pm to
quote:

It puts our money on requirements and not on employees or inventory. It HURTS Blacks, women, and young people's employment.



Everyone should pay attention carbon tax proposals. It will be sold as helping the environment and a cost to oil companies or hydrocarbon business.

It wont hurt the companies it will hurt everyone who uses the products. Every time anyone fills up, hidden in increased airfare, bus fare or products delivered to your home or local store, on and on … Everyday people will pay through a number of increased living costs.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram