Started By
Message
locked post

"Wealth Inequality in America: Its worse than you think" - Fortune

Posted on 10/31/14 at 2:46 pm
Posted by BobBoucher
Member since Jan 2008
16726 posts
Posted on 10/31/14 at 2:46 pm
This article indicates its a forty year trend, so maybe its not as political as some might try to make it. Which begs the question why i would post it on the poli board.

it may not be caused by any one political philosophy, but the solution, if there is to be one, will almost certainly have to come through politics.

quote:

In other words, there’s evidence that rising inequality and many other intractable social problems are related. Not only is rising inequality bad for business, it’s bad for society, too.


LINK



This post was edited on 10/31/14 at 2:47 pm
Posted by TK421
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2011
10411 posts
Posted on 10/31/14 at 2:48 pm to
quote:

In other words, there’s evidence that rising inequality and many other intractable social problems are related. Not only is rising inequality bad for business, it’s bad for society, too.


I don't think is true so long as standard of living continues to increase for the rest of us at roughly the same pace as the 1%.
Posted by BugAC
St. George
Member since Oct 2007
52787 posts
Posted on 10/31/14 at 2:50 pm to
quote:

Wealth Inequality


I don't make as much money as some, but i also don't think i deserve special treatment because i'm not as rich as some people.

The inherit problem with wealth inequality, is those that think they are unequal, bitch about it more instead of earning money for themselves. I have no pity for whiners. You don't like your current state in life? Only you can change it. Daddy government can't make you rich. But it definitely can demotivate you from ever providing for yourself or your family.

Wealth Inequality = Another meaningless liberal bitch fest
Posted by 90proofprofessional
Member since Mar 2004
24445 posts
Posted on 10/31/14 at 2:51 pm to
What if higher inequality in advanced economies and a higher standard of living for the lower and middle classes were caused by the same thing? Is rising inequality necessarily a problem then?

ETA: meant to respond to OP not TK.
This post was edited on 10/31/14 at 2:52 pm
Posted by BugAC
St. George
Member since Oct 2007
52787 posts
Posted on 10/31/14 at 2:53 pm to
And everyone knows who is targeted with this wealth inequality meme. White men. I don't see any liberal pussies bitching about how much money Kobe Bryant makes, and why professional sports or movie stars aren't targeted for more taxation or penalties. But if some business owner makes a dime, the left demands they have it simply for the fact that they were too chicken shite to earn a living for themselves.
This post was edited on 10/31/14 at 2:54 pm
Posted by C
Houston
Member since Dec 2007
27824 posts
Posted on 10/31/14 at 2:54 pm to
quote:

so long as standard of living continues to increase


This should be the defining goal of our society.
Posted by Retrograde
TX
Member since Jul 2014
2900 posts
Posted on 10/31/14 at 2:55 pm to
This is an age old problem, and it has an age old response.

There is only one of two ways to fix the problem -

Bring the top down or the bottom up. The former is socialism/communism, and the latter is capitalism. I know which one I would pick every day of the week.
This post was edited on 10/31/14 at 2:55 pm
Posted by BobBoucher
Member since Jan 2008
16726 posts
Posted on 10/31/14 at 2:55 pm to
quote:

Daddy government can't make you rich. But it definitely can demotivate you from ever providing for yourself or your family.


quote:

Wealth Inequality = Another meaningless liberal bitch fest


you didnt read it.
Posted by BigJim
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2010
14491 posts
Posted on 10/31/14 at 2:55 pm to
quote:

In other words, there’s evidence that rising inequality and many other intractable social problems are related. Not only is rising inequality bad for business, it’s bad for society, too.


Their idea of evidence is quoting a historian. Sorry, I need a little more than that.

Now if mobility has decreased (and I think I read that it has somewhere) that, to me, is a bigger problem.
Posted by BaylorTiger
Member since Nov 2006
2083 posts
Posted on 10/31/14 at 2:59 pm to
frickIN CHRIST. This is the pre-election click bait of the centruy.

Wealth Inequality isn't bad in of it's self. It's HOW it is created that determines that.

Political policies are marginal, FED policies are what have created this gap and, imho, yes this wealth gap is bad...not because wealth gaps are bad but because of how this one has been created.
Posted by genro
Member since Nov 2011
61788 posts
Posted on 10/31/14 at 3:01 pm to
quote:

Their idea of evidence is quoting a historian. Sorry, I need a little more than that.
It's the presumption that all of civilized history is defined by class struggle. Marxism 101, and total bunk.
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
112460 posts
Posted on 10/31/14 at 3:12 pm to
I read the article and it doesn't address the basic question... Why is inequality bad?

If I make 10M a year what am I going to do with my riches? Only two choices: Spend it (good). Invest it (good). Both choices help the population at large.

The only scenarios where I can think that inequality is bad is in totalitarian states. North Korea in 1950 is poor. South Korea in 1950 is poor but has some crops. North Korea invades.

Same can be said with more developed states that are totalitarian. Resource wars. But in a nation like the US where the poor live like rich people in 3rd world countries there is no negative impact from inequality.
Posted by genro
Member since Nov 2011
61788 posts
Posted on 10/31/14 at 3:14 pm to
The negative impact is that humans are naturally jealous. So you encourage class warfare, buy off votes with union kickbacks and entitlements, and set yourself up as the plutocrats.
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
112460 posts
Posted on 10/31/14 at 3:19 pm to
quote:

The negative impact is that humans are naturally jealous. So you encourage class warfare, buy off votes with union kickbacks and entitlements, and set yourself up as the plutocrats.


Good point. So here is a hypothetical for the board.

Choice A: The 10th percentile of income earners in this society make $200K a year. The 90th percentile of income earners make $20K a year.

Choice B: The 10th percentile of income earners in this society make 500K a year. The 90th percentile of income earners make $30K a year.

Which society would you prefer? A or B?
Posted by Ralph_Wiggum
Sugarland
Member since Jul 2005
10666 posts
Posted on 10/31/14 at 3:20 pm to
quote:

Daddy government can't make you rich.


A lot of Republicans get rich from government contracts in construction and defense. Daddy government can make you very rich.
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
57222 posts
Posted on 10/31/14 at 3:20 pm to
quote:

This article indicates its a forty year trend,
Its overlays well with inflation. Which makes perfect sense if you think about it.

quote:

Not only is rising inequality bad for business, it’s bad for society, too
Only if you a sizable portion of the population greedy enough to think they have a right to other people's money.

Otherwise, it's a f*cking opportunity.
Posted by Ralph_Wiggum
Sugarland
Member since Jul 2005
10666 posts
Posted on 10/31/14 at 3:22 pm to
quote:

I read the article and it doesn't address the basic question... Why is inequality bad?


Inequality is not bad in a society if A. all people have an equal opportunity to better themselves and B. we as a society agree that your basic needs should be a concern for all society i.e. you are not going hungry and you have a place to live and access to education and health care.
Posted by Ralph_Wiggum
Sugarland
Member since Jul 2005
10666 posts
Posted on 10/31/14 at 3:24 pm to
Conservatives need to fear rising income inequality because the great socialist revolutions in Russia and China came about due to great income inequality.

As a socialist I am torn about the rising income inequality. Short-term many people suffer but long-term it sets the conditions for revolution.
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
112460 posts
Posted on 10/31/14 at 3:26 pm to
quote:

A lot of Republicans get rich from government contracts in construction and defense. Daddy government can make you very rich.


The richest members of Congress are Democrats.
Posted by 90proofprofessional
Member since Mar 2004
24445 posts
Posted on 10/31/14 at 3:27 pm to
quote:

rising income inequality

is not a sufficient condition for
quote:

many people suffer
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram