Started By
Message
locked post

Was the failed rescue attempt of Foley due to faulty intelligence?

Posted on 8/21/14 at 6:24 pm
Posted by DawgfaninCa
San Francisco, California
Member since Sep 2012
20092 posts
Posted on 8/21/14 at 6:24 pm
According to Oduma's spokesperson it wasn't. ISIS just moved Foley and the other captives shortly before the rescue attempt began.

Yet the Left still claims the invasion of Iraq was based on faulty intelligence that Saddam had WMDs. The Left claims the fact that no WMDs were found in Iraq is because there never were any WMDs in Iraq.

Similar to the case of the failed rescue attempt, couldn't it be that the failure to find WMDs in Iraq wasn't due to faulty intelligence but that it was because the WMDs were moved to Syria shortly before the invasion began?
This post was edited on 8/21/14 at 6:53 pm
Posted by fleaux
section 0
Member since Aug 2012
8741 posts
Posted on 8/21/14 at 6:25 pm to
YouTube video
Posted by GeauxxxTigers23
TeamBunt General Manager
Member since Apr 2013
62514 posts
Posted on 8/21/14 at 6:26 pm to
There was a failed rescue? I missed this.
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
98180 posts
Posted on 8/21/14 at 6:27 pm to
They missed him by a day or two. Most rescue attempts fail. They're high risk operations.
Posted by Rex
Here, there, and nowhere
Member since Sep 2004
66001 posts
Posted on 8/21/14 at 6:28 pm to
Don't you know that every American death is the result of a failure of intelligence coupled with incompetence topped with corruption?
Posted by Champagne
Already Conquered USA.
Member since Oct 2007
48328 posts
Posted on 8/21/14 at 6:33 pm to
That's correct in the Age of Obama, Rex.
Posted by DawgfaninCa
San Francisco, California
Member since Sep 2012
20092 posts
Posted on 8/21/14 at 7:30 pm to
quote:

Don't you know that every American death is the result of a failure of intelligence coupled with incompetence topped with corruption?


Then you disagree with your great leader.
Posted by DawgfaninCa
San Francisco, California
Member since Sep 2012
20092 posts
Posted on 8/21/14 at 7:37 pm to
quote:

They missed him by a day or two. Most rescue attempts fail. They're high risk operations.


That's irrelevant.

Besides, maybe they finished moving the WMDs to Syria a day or two before the invasion began.

Posted by notiger1997
Metairie
Member since May 2009
58122 posts
Posted on 8/21/14 at 7:41 pm to
You people are being such idiots it makes me hard to acknowledge that I'm a republican.
Quit with this kind of stupid fcking immature stuff.
Posted by TT9
Global warming
Member since Sep 2008
82952 posts
Posted on 8/21/14 at 7:43 pm to
Upvote!!!!!!
Posted by TupeloTiger
Tupelo,Ms.[via Bastrop,La.]
Member since Jul 2004
4340 posts
Posted on 8/21/14 at 7:47 pm to
They were slow in getting the approval to go ahead with the rescue. 2 days slow. CNN said if they had left immediately, they would have rescued them. They got moved while Obama talked about it. He needs a sense of urgency that business teaches you.
Posted by DawgfaninCa
San Francisco, California
Member since Sep 2012
20092 posts
Posted on 8/21/14 at 8:08 pm to
quote:

You people are being such idiots it makes me hard to acknowledge that I'm a republican.
Quit with this kind of stupid fcking immature stuff.


Are you referring to me pointing out that when the rescue attempt failed because Foley and the other captives weren't there Oduma's spokesman said it wasn't due to faulty intelligence but because they moved Foley and the other captives shortly before the rescue attempt yet when the Iraq invasion failed to find WMDs it was due to faulty intelligence since there were never any WMDs in Iraq not because the WMDs were moved to Syria shortly before the invasion began?

What evidence do you or Oduma have that Foley and the other captives were ever at that location?
This post was edited on 8/21/14 at 8:18 pm
Posted by DawgfaninCa
San Francisco, California
Member since Sep 2012
20092 posts
Posted on 8/21/14 at 8:24 pm to
quote:

CNN said if they had left immediately, they would have rescued them.


If CNN said it then it must be true.

What evidence has CNN presented that if they had left immediately, they would have rescued them?

Posted by LSUwag
Florida man
Member since Jan 2007
17319 posts
Posted on 8/21/14 at 9:12 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 11/6/15 at 4:35 pm
Posted by socraticsilence
Member since Dec 2013
1347 posts
Posted on 8/22/14 at 1:38 am to
quote:

You people are being such idiots it makes me hard to acknowledge that I'm a republican.
Quit with this kind of stupid fcking immature stuff.


Are you referring to me pointing out that when the rescue attempt failed because Foley and the other captives weren't there Oduma's spokesman said it wasn't due to faulty intelligence but because they moved Foley and the other captives shortly before the rescue attempt yet when the Iraq invasion failed to find WMDs it was due to faulty intelligence since there were never any WMDs in Iraq not because the WMDs were moved to Syria shortly before the invasion began?

What evidence do you or Oduma have that Foley and the other captives were ever at that location?




This and Iraq are comparable in the same way stubbing your toe is comparable to stepping on a land mine- both involve mistakes but the latter actions are far, far more damaging.

Not to mention one was taken in response to aggression while the other was a freaking war of choice.
This post was edited on 8/22/14 at 1:39 am
Posted by Layabout
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2011
11082 posts
Posted on 8/22/14 at 2:09 am to
quote:

Besides, maybe they finished moving the WMDs to Syria a day or two before the invasion began.


It's a lot easier to stuff one guy in the trunk of a car than it is to move a convoy of trucks without being detected.
Posted by Tigah in the ATL
Atlanta
Member since Feb 2005
27539 posts
Posted on 8/22/14 at 2:21 am to
quote:

Yet the Left still claims the invasion of Iraq was based on faulty intelligence that Saddam had WMDs. The Left claims the fact that no WMDs were found in Iraq is because there never were any WMDs in Iraq.
are you still on the WMD thing?

Stop being Dick Cheney.

We went to war in Iraq because the executive branch wanted to go to war in Iraq.
Posted by ChineseBandit58
Pearland, TX
Member since Aug 2005
42575 posts
Posted on 8/22/14 at 5:32 am to
quote:

t's a lot easier to stuff one guy in the trunk of a car than it is to move a convoy of trucks without being detected.

I believe convoys of trucks moving to Syria were observed for months prior to the invasion.

Is that incorrect?
Posted by Strannix
District 11
Member since Dec 2012
48900 posts
Posted on 8/22/14 at 5:40 am to
There were WMD in Iraq, tons and tons, there was just an article a week ago saying the Obama was afraid ISIS could capture them. Why do people KEEP saying there were no WMD in Iraq??????
Posted by GeeOH
Louisiana
Member since Dec 2013
13376 posts
Posted on 8/22/14 at 8:10 am to
quote:

They missed him by a day or two. Most rescue attempts fail. They're high risk operations.


Of course they did. They have to wait for the final say before they start. I know you are shocked, but the delay was them waiting on word from The White House...imagine that! Golf anyone?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram