- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Uh-oh... Scientists prove ancient Egyptians weren't "African."
Posted on 5/31/17 at 9:03 am to bamafan1001
Posted on 5/31/17 at 9:03 am to bamafan1001
quote:Says the person focusing on down votes.
You seem upset
0
Posted on 5/31/17 at 9:19 am to bamafan1001
quote:
You seem upset
Displaced Buckeye is lost without his leader.
Every lapdog needs their master.
Posted on 5/31/17 at 9:27 am to StraightCashHomey21
quote:
That's bc most modern day Egyptians are fricking Arab. Not African, Arabs plundered all through Africa during Islamic expansion.
This article is retarded.
This quote from article says the testing was done on the mummies. Not modern day Egyptians.
quote:
The research found that ancient Egyptians were most closely related to Neolithic Levantine, Anatolian and European populations. The mummies tested did not share strong genetic links to Africa often found in modern Egyptians.
The mummies that were tested are from PRIOR to the Islamic expansion, (or Islam in general).
Posted on 5/31/17 at 9:35 am to bamafan1001
Only one of us is concerned about downvotes.
Posted on 5/31/17 at 9:36 am to KCT
Just busted your stupid link.
Posted on 5/31/17 at 9:37 am to DisplacedBuckeye
Am I the first person to make the we was not kangz joke?
Posted on 5/31/17 at 9:49 am to bamarep
quote:Egypt IS African, so "Egyptians weren't African" won't play well anywhere.
Uh-oh... Scientists prove ancient Egyptians weren't "African."
This won't play well with the liberal idiots.
Obviously though the odd reference was to race, despite emphasis on locale. In that vein Egyptian hieroglyphs draw obvious racial distinctions between Egyptians and Subsaharan peoples. There was never serious question about that.
Posted on 5/31/17 at 10:00 am to StraightCashHomey21
It's just like the Afro-centric advocates trying to claim Cleoparta as African , which probably came as news to all of the real Egyptologists who knew that she was directly descended from the Ptolemy line of rulers installed after the death of Alexander the Great who was ....Macedonian/Greek...from Europe
Posted on 5/31/17 at 10:02 am to bamarep
They were Semitic and Mediterranean, like ancient Hebrews and modern day Arabs. All depictions of ancient Egyptians with Negroid characteristics fail
Posted on 5/31/17 at 10:05 am to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
Just busted your stupid link.
Actually, you didn't. But, I'm sure you know more about DNA findings than actual scientists.
Posted on 5/31/17 at 10:07 am to mmcgrath
You mean there is still a ????chance??? that a pharaoh with sub-Saharan features built the pyramids??????
Posted on 5/31/17 at 10:10 am to bamarep
Posted on 5/31/17 at 10:13 am to buckeye_vol
quote:
quote:
Add another 8% for women would would have the same parentage = 16%
It would still be ~ 8% since the denominator (the population) also doubled.
It's not often that I step on my foreskin this badly.
I really don't know what to say - other than I must need a few more cups of coffee.
This is the most embarrassing thing I have ever posted - and I will leave it up (after I edit a disclaimer to prevent further comments) as a constant reminder that I need to be sure I don't post without reflection.
Posted on 5/31/17 at 10:17 am to mmcgrath
You got me - I plead for your mercy.
Posted on 5/31/17 at 10:26 am to KCT
quote:
Actually, you didn't.
I did. You missed it, apparently, but that's not important.
quote:
I'm sure you know more about DNA findings than actual scientists.
Which scientists? The distinction is important.
Posted on 5/31/17 at 10:45 am to StraightCashHomey21
Let me guess a white scientist came up with that. Smh they be whitewashin' everything. Dey be jellous cause we buildin pyramids and dey livin I'm caves
Posted on 5/31/17 at 10:46 am to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
Which scientists? The distinction is important.
Scientists who look at the evidence with an unbiased eye as opposed to biased scientists who refuse to look at the evidence or look at the evidence with a biased eye in order to claim the evidence supports their blind belief such as the biased scientists who know my 3 videos do not contain any evidence that proves large unknown serpentine marine animals commonly called a "sea serpent" exist because those biased scientists know "sea serpents" don't exist and are just mythical.
This post was edited on 5/31/17 at 10:50 am
Posted on 5/31/17 at 10:57 am to DawgfaninCa
Cool.
So what about scientists who claim results by watching the Discovery Channel?
So what about scientists who claim results by watching the Discovery Channel?
Posted on 5/31/17 at 11:01 am to ChineseBandit58
quote:Been there, done that.
You got me - I plead for your mercy.
Posted on 5/31/17 at 11:20 am to StraightCashHomey21
quote:I'm sorry reality bothers you
For fricks sake you are sad to give a shite or to come to that conclusion
Page 4 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News