- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 6/8/17 at 11:57 pm to Toddy
Posted on 6/9/17 at 1:32 am to Champagne
quote:
I'm convinced that you are mentally unbalanced.
well, he is gay
Posted on 6/9/17 at 4:32 am to Toddy
quote:The Executive Branch does not answer to the Legislative Branch.
Toddy
Don't be that guy.
Posted on 6/9/17 at 4:47 am to Ebbandflow
quote:
Probably wouldn't but he hasnt really been a reliable source of truth. Btw, its continually....not continuously.
Appreciate the honesty. Correcting grammar = white flag. Time to pivot.
Posted on 6/9/17 at 4:48 am to Toddy
quote:Yes!
Would you Trumpkins object to this?
I would object to it 100%.
Just as I would object to Trump being able to remove RBG from SCOTUS.
and in light of James Clapper's comments last night, even if you don't understand importance of separation-of-powers within the three branches of government, you damn well better understand what separates democracy and autocracy. James Clapper now publicly represents its antithesis.
Posted on 6/9/17 at 4:48 am to Wolfhound45
quote:
The Executive Branch does not answer to the Legislative Branch.
Yes it does
all three branches have to answer to each other. that's the whole point of separation of powers.
Posted on 6/9/17 at 5:35 am to Toddy
quote:
you think he would get this done anyway.
Economy? Up
Jobs? Up
Dow? Historically up
National Debt? Down
America? Great.
You? Upset.
Posted on 6/9/17 at 7:50 am to Toddy
Where was your and all the other libtards concern when Obama was interfering with the Russian, Israeli and Brixit elections? Just keep melting you have over 7 more years to go...
Posted on 6/9/17 at 8:01 am to JuiceTerry
quote:
Pretty telling his fanbois don't want him to tell his side of the story. Let's hear the tapes.
Even if there were tapes and we heard them and they 100% confirmed Trump's accounts of the conversations, morons like you would claim that the Russians hacked them and altered them.
You morons over played your hand and the average American is getting pissed. There is no evidence that Trump broke any laws, time to move on.
Posted on 6/9/17 at 8:44 am to Toddy
It's like a gambler on a losing streak.
Liberals are like just one more try. The next one is sure to be a winner.
I'll say this. They are good at the long game. They've succesfully wasted 6 months of this admin
Liberals are like just one more try. The next one is sure to be a winner.
I'll say this. They are good at the long game. They've succesfully wasted 6 months of this admin
Posted on 6/9/17 at 1:19 pm to baytiger
No it does not answer to the Legislative Branch. It has separate and distinct powers. Damn dude, you are being that guy too.
Posted on 6/9/17 at 1:23 pm to Toddy
quote:
Would you Trumpkins object to this? If Trump refutes Comey's account under oath then someone has committed perjury.
You want Trump to go under oath and refute what Comey said? Didn't Comey say that Trump was right?
You didn't get what you wanted from Comey, did you?
Posted on 6/9/17 at 1:29 pm to Toddy
quote:
follow Comey's example
Stopped right there...
Posted on 6/10/17 at 10:08 am to Toddy
quote:So you prejudge him as guilty even though to date not a single person has testified to or gone on record with any illegal behavior meanwhile all those unnamed sources continue to be proven wrong over and over.
He wouldn't say that because he's not stupid enough to lie under oath ( I assume)
Posted on 6/10/17 at 10:12 am to TigerMyth36
quote:For all the fuss, it has been the same 6 or 7 people testifying. Just IC heads and they either aren't a part of the investigation or they can't talk in open session.
So you prejudge him as guilty even though to date not a single person has testified to or gone on record with any illegal behavior meanwhile all those unnamed sources continue to be proven wrong over and over.
Posted on 6/10/17 at 10:14 am to mmcgrath
So nothing not a smidgen means we need more nothing not a smidgen. Nice work McWant.
Posted on 6/10/17 at 10:17 am to Toddy
quote:
Would you Trumpkins object to this? If Trump refutes Comey's account under oath then someone has committed perjury.
A toothless tiger, Toddy. Barring "tapes"...it's a He said-He said scenario.
And Trump is THE BOSS. He can do whatever he damn well pleases (just like Obama), and is accountable to the VOTERS...or the Congress via Impeachment only. That's it.
Posted on 6/10/17 at 10:20 am to Jbird
quote:more like saying I would like to see someone different testify. Kushner, Stone, Page, Sessions, etc. We don't need to hear from Rogers, Coates, Comey, Rosenstein, or anyone else running the investigation. They can't tell you anything anyway.
So nothing not a smidgen means we need more nothing not a smidgen. Nice work McWant.
Posted on 6/10/17 at 10:22 am to mmcgrath
quote:So you want to undermine Mueller for political points brilliant!
I would like to see someone different testify. Kushner, Stone, Page, Sessions, etc.
Page 4 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News