Started By
Message

re: Trump just went off on twitter about London mayor

Posted on 6/5/17 at 11:12 am to
Posted by HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay
Member since Feb 2017
12458 posts
Posted on 6/5/17 at 11:12 am to
quote:

It was required? What was the enforcement mechanism?


Come on man, you know the US isn't the country that is going to enter into an agreement and not hold up our end of the bargain. That's what the whole world was counting on.


Posted by cwill
Member since Jan 2005
54752 posts
Posted on 6/5/17 at 11:42 am to
quote:

Question. If you are not going to abide by the Paris Accord, why be in it?

Honest to goodness, man. This is an honest question

You guys run around screaming why did we get out of the agreement, then when we tell you, you say, it wasn't binding! We didn't have to comply with it.

So, if we are not going to comply with the agreement, why was it so necessary that we be in it?


I just pointed out that the reasons provided by you and Andy aren't legitimate - we weren't required by the Agreement to do either.

My only comments about the withdrawal on this board has been that it's all form over substance on both sides.
Posted by GurleyGirl
Georgia
Member since Nov 2015
13164 posts
Posted on 6/5/17 at 11:43 am to
quote:

Trump just went off on twitter about London mayorMayor of London has " pathetic excuse"


Thank God we finally have a President who's telling it like it is.
Posted by SUB
Member since Jan 2001
Member since Jan 2009
20780 posts
Posted on 6/5/17 at 11:44 am to
quote:

And he obviously took the mayor's statement out of context so he's not even doing it right.



One of the few times I agree with you, but you need to post the mayor's full quote, even though most people here will ignore it.

quote:

“My message to Londoners and visitors to our great city is to be calm and vigilant today. You will see an increased police presence today, including armed officers and uniformed officers. There is no reason to be alarmed by this. We are the safest global city in the world. You saw last night as a consequence of our planning, our preparation, the rehearsals that take place, the swift response from the emergency services tackling the terrorists and also helping the injured.”


I'm equally pissed when the media does the same with Trump or whoever else.

That being said, the mayor has said some things in the past that can be interpreted to mean that Londoners should expect to just have to live with terrorism. Which is probably why so many bought into the tweet.
This post was edited on 6/5/17 at 11:45 am
Posted by HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay
Member since Feb 2017
12458 posts
Posted on 6/5/17 at 11:44 am to
quote:

My only comments about the withdrawal on this board has been that it's all form over substance on both sides.
d


That's not entirely true, because the agreement allowed other countries to use OUR court system to sue our government if we didn't meet or "voluntary" obligations. No other nation in the agreement agreed to that stipulation. I wonder why?

Posted by cwill
Member since Jan 2005
54752 posts
Posted on 6/5/17 at 11:57 am to
quote:

That's not entirely true, because the agreement allowed other countries to use OUR court system to sue our government if we didn't meet or "voluntary" obligations. No other nation in the agreement agreed to that stipulation. I wonder why?


Link?

I've read an argument that environmental groups might have used the Agreement as a basis to sue as Trump rolls back green house gas emission limitations...he's going to get sued regardless. But that's not what you're saying...that's why I'm asking for the link.
Posted by bencoleman
RIP 7/19
Member since Feb 2009
37887 posts
Posted on 6/5/17 at 12:53 pm to
It never fails, it's the people that can't stand Trump to begin with that want him to stop tweeting. It tells me that he needs to tweet more.
Posted by HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay
Member since Feb 2017
12458 posts
Posted on 6/5/17 at 1:05 pm to
quote:


Trump just went off on twitter about London mayor

quote:
That's not entirely true, because the agreement allowed other countries to use OUR court system to sue our government if we didn't meet or "voluntary" obligations. No other nation in the agreement agreed to that stipulation. I wonder why?



Link?

I've read an argument that environmental groups might have used the Agreement as a basis to sue as Trump rolls back green house gas emission limitations...he's going to get sued regardless. But that's not what you're saying...that's why I'm asking for the link.


LINK /

You can then reference the agreement itself to confirm

LINK



This agreement is nothing but another attempt to get the west to feel guilty about its successes and give yet more money to poorer nations.

It literally has nothing to do with a cleaner environment.

For God's sakes, China and India both sat their goals for 2020 as DOUBLING their current pollution levels LOL
Posted by bencoleman
RIP 7/19
Member since Feb 2009
37887 posts
Posted on 6/5/17 at 1:21 pm to
quote:

This agreement is nothing but another attempt to get the west to feel guilty about its successes and give yet more money to poorer nations.

It literally has nothing to do with a cleaner environment.

For God's sakes, China and India both sat their goals for 2020 as DOUBLING



Which tells me that the people that are bitching about the pull out don't have our best interests in mind.
Posted by cwill
Member since Jan 2005
54752 posts
Posted on 6/5/17 at 1:36 pm to
quote:

LINK /

You can then reference the agreement itself to confirm


This link and article matches what I posted above and not your assertion:

quote:

That's not entirely true, because the agreement allowed other countries to use OUR court system to sue our government if we didn't meet or "voluntary" obligations.


Regarding the full text of the agreement, I did numerous word searches using typical terms regarding making legal claims and found no matches.

I see nothing in the article or agreement that supports your quoted claim above.
Posted by AUstar
Member since Dec 2012
16999 posts
Posted on 6/5/17 at 1:38 pm to
Apparently KAC's husband is mad at Trump over the tweets.
Posted by BamaScoop
Panama City Beach, Florida
Member since May 2007
53816 posts
Posted on 6/5/17 at 1:41 pm to
That mayor is a muslim alsonisnt he? Europe is hopeless unless they kick these fricks out of their country!
Posted by TheGooner
Baton Rouwage
Member since Jul 2016
996 posts
Posted on 6/5/17 at 1:41 pm to
quote:

So after a YUGE terror attack in London, Trump is trolling and making this into a political issue.


How is this not a political issue?
Posted by HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay
Member since Feb 2017
12458 posts
Posted on 6/5/17 at 1:44 pm to
quote:

This link and article matches what I posted above and not your assertion:


of ccourse it does.

Right from the article

A private party might now sue the government, claiming that the Trump administration’s environmental regulatory changes (including rescinding, changing, or failing to enact rules) violated this U.S. commitment.

Why? Because Article 4.11 of the agreement allows signatories to adjust a nationally determined contribution “with a view to enhancing its level of ambition, in accordance with guidance adopted by the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the parties to this agreement.”

A plaintiff environmental group, for example, might argue that environmental regulatory relief would not “enhance” the Obama administration’s commitment. Rather, the plaintiff might claim that it would undercut that commitment, and therefore violate the Paris Agreement.
Posted by cwill
Member since Jan 2005
54752 posts
Posted on 6/5/17 at 1:53 pm to
My friend...I don't know what you're reading, none of that equates to your claim:

quote:

That's not entirely true, because the agreement allowed other countries to use OUR court system to sue our government if we didn't meet or "voluntary" obligations.


It does match up with what I posted in my initial response:

quote:

I've read an argument that environmental groups might have used the Agreement as a basis to sue as Trump rolls back green house gas emission limitations...he's going to get sued regardless. But that's not what you're saying...that's why I'm asking for the link.


Try again?
Posted by LSUTANGERINE
Baton Rouge LA
Member since Sep 2006
36113 posts
Posted on 6/5/17 at 3:05 pm to
Mayor fires back.
quote:

In a statement, the mayor’s office said Khan “has more important things to do than respond to Donald Trump's ill-informed tweet that deliberately takes out of context his remarks urging Londoners not to be alarmed when they saw more police — including armed officers — on the streets.”

LINK
This post was edited on 6/5/17 at 3:06 pm
Posted by notsince98
KC, MO
Member since Oct 2012
17964 posts
Posted on 6/5/17 at 3:15 pm to
quote:

Mayor fires back.


Duh....of course he does. He has to figure out how to deal with radical islamic terrorism instead of pretending it isn't an issue.
Posted by League Champs
Bayou Self
Member since Oct 2012
10340 posts
Posted on 6/5/17 at 3:58 pm to
Mayor of London
quote:

Mayor Sadiq Khan warned Londoners that terrorist attacks are “part and parcel” of living in a big city

quote:

No reason to be alarmed

3 attacks in as many weeks


And people are upset about what Trump is saying?


Posted by TN Bhoy
San Antonio, TX
Member since Apr 2010
60589 posts
Posted on 6/5/17 at 4:35 pm to
Context, brah.

He's telling people not to be alarmed by the presence of a bunch of armed police and military on the streets of London.
Posted by Seldom Seen
Member since Feb 2016
39990 posts
Posted on 6/5/17 at 4:41 pm to
God, I love Our President so much!



We're lucky to have him folks!
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram