- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 3/14/17 at 12:25 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:
But you're getting closer.
Posted on 3/14/17 at 1:18 pm to Iosh
quote:
Most of it.
Most of it?? Great! Then you have many examples to choose from. What are a couple of them?
Posted on 3/14/17 at 1:25 pm to Iosh
quote:
Most of it.
Hey losh...here's the existence of a point. What percentage of the atmosphere is made up of CO2?
Both naturally occurring and man made...what would the percentage of the whole equal for CO2?
Posted on 3/14/17 at 1:31 pm to Dale51
Anyone know where bmy went?? He disappeared after I asked this question
Why do you suppose that is??
quote:
Lets establish a baseline. bmy...what percentage of the atmosphere is CO2, naturally occurring and man made? What would that percentage be?
Why do you suppose that is??
Posted on 3/14/17 at 1:55 pm to Dale51
quote:
Anyone know where bmy went??
He posted:
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
to be clear you're saying that there would be no difference in the climate of the 3 planets? i'm not an alarmist or anything.. i think we should strive to control the climate to do the greatest amount of good possible
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
And I asked:
quote:
Who decides what's best?
Do we let a UN committee tell us we need to do to "maximize" the climate? Who decides if South Africa benefits at Canada's expense, or if the US should curtail emissions so New Guinea's benefits?
I wonder why he left?
Posted on 3/14/17 at 2:20 pm to Dale51
quote:
Most of it?? Great! Then you have many examples to choose from. What are a couple of them?
quote:See, now you're not even waiting for your copypasta to be answered before moving on to a different argument. It's a Gish gallop.
Hey losh...here's the existence of a point. What percentage of the atmosphere is made up of CO2?
Both naturally occurring and man made...what would the percentage of the whole equal for CO2?
This post was edited on 3/14/17 at 2:25 pm
Posted on 3/14/17 at 2:35 pm to Iosh
quote:
See, now you're not even waiting for your copypasta to be answered before moving on to a different argument. It's a Gish gallop.
You're projecting again.
So you can only handle 1 question at a time. Fine with me. Pick which one you want and answer it. You have no problem with that, right?
Posted on 3/14/17 at 3:08 pm to bhtigerfan
quote:
Like volcanoes?
No, we can't reproduce volcanoes.
You fail.
But if we could.. could we alter the climate? Hypothetically speaking
Posted on 3/14/17 at 3:10 pm to Dale51
quote:
So you can only handle 1 question at a time. Fine with me. Pick which one you want and answer it.
quote:A little over 0.04%. Where's the point?
Hey losh...here's the existence of a point. What percentage of the atmosphere is made up of CO2?
This post was edited on 3/14/17 at 3:11 pm
Posted on 3/14/17 at 3:15 pm to doubleb
quote:
Who decides what's best?
Do we let a UN committee tell us we need to do to "maximize" the climate? Who decides if South Africa benefits at Canada's expense, or if the US should curtail emissions so New Guinea's benefits?
quote:
Anyone know where bmy went??
I was at work.. sometimes resource damage assessment takes both hands
Good question. Don't have a great answer.. but that doesn't mean there isn't an answer out there. A global government could do it.. but not in todays world
This post was edited on 3/14/17 at 3:24 pm
Posted on 3/14/17 at 3:20 pm to doubleb
quote:
Doesn't that seem a bit arrogant???
Yes. It also seems arrogant to assume that we can't alter a planets climate.
Why is Dale bitching about his question going unanswered when he never answered the question the thread is based on
This post was edited on 3/14/17 at 3:24 pm
Posted on 3/14/17 at 3:28 pm to bmy
quote:
A global government could do it..
You nailed it. Thank you for being open about it.
I thank you for your honesty because "Global Government" is the goal of the entire Globalist and Climate Change agenda.
Global Government: the "Next Phase of Human History". Nation-States are, according to the Globalists, out-dated, racist and dangerous. Subjugate the sovereignty of the nation-states, ESPECIALLY the USA, so that the Global Govt may work freely to create Paradise on Earth. Who will pay for Paradise? The taxpaying citizens of the USA will pay for it.
Not long ago, one could Google "UN Model for Global Governance" and the UN website would pop up -- the whole proposed structure of the Global Govt was on-line for all to see. Sadly, that website no longer exists.
SO, if you personally are not in favor of Global Government, you are out of step with almost all of your Climate Change churchmembers, and you are certainly out of step with the leaders of the Climate Change Church.
This post was edited on 3/14/17 at 3:30 pm
Posted on 3/14/17 at 3:29 pm to Champagne
quote:Is the Montreal Protocol "global government?"
I thank you for your honesty because "Global Government" is the goal of the entire Globalist and Climate Change agenda.
Posted on 3/14/17 at 3:35 pm to Champagne
I'm not against the idea of a global government.. I'm against the most likely form it would ultimately take. A global constitution... Sure. Good place to start.
It will all fall apart when we inevitably become an interstellar species anyways
It will all fall apart when we inevitably become an interstellar species anyways
Posted on 3/14/17 at 3:49 pm to Iosh
quote:
A little over 0.04%. Where's the point?
It's actually a little under 0.04%..about 0.038%
The point is, that volume is the total amount. Of that 0.04% an estimated 3-4% of that is do to human activity. So 3-4 % of 0,04% is the driver of catastrophe?? 0.034% of the whole?..everything is fine..totally natural and healthy. 0.038% of the whole? Horror....panic!
It's just dumb to think such a dramatic change will come from such a minuscule amount, and the science proves it to be an absurdist position.
Posted on 3/14/17 at 3:56 pm to Champagne
quote:A treaty would also be sufficient to address global warming. (A good treaty, not Kyoto.)
No, it's a treaty.
Posted on 3/14/17 at 4:10 pm to bmy
quote:
Why is Dale bitching about his question going unanswered when he never answered the question the thread is based on
What question is that.."does the climate change?"
Of course it does, it always has and always will. I have never heard of or read anyone denying that, have you?
Page 7 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News