Started By
Message
locked post

TIL all white men got to vote just 14 years before black men

Posted on 3/27/18 at 9:49 am
Posted by Kujo
225-911-5736
Member since Dec 2015
6015 posts
Posted on 3/27/18 at 9:49 am
quote:



1856: Abolition of property qualifications for white men
In the United States, the rise of Jacksonian democracy from the 1820s to 1850s led to a close approximation of universal manhood suffrage among whites being adopted in all states by 1856


quote:

1870: Non-white men and freed slaves are guaranteed the right to vote by the Fifteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution


Poor/non-land owning white men weren't all allowed to vote until 1856, and black men got to in 1870.

I thought it was a lot longer than that. Considering that the Revolutionary War ended in 1783, 1856 & 1870 seem like a pretty quick turnaround. Not sure why people feel like they were so greatly hindered.
Posted by SirWinston
PNW
Member since Jul 2014
81423 posts
Posted on 3/27/18 at 9:52 am to
It blew my mind to hear it stated black black men got the vote like 45 years sooner than white women. I think I knew the approximate dates and all, but I'd never heard the facts pieced together like that. Ever. And I'm a political junkie.


This post was edited on 3/27/18 at 9:53 am
Posted by olddawg26
Member since Jan 2013
24578 posts
Posted on 3/27/18 at 9:54 am to
Yup its pretty much been even steven besides those 14 years.
Posted by GREENHEAD22
Member since Nov 2009
19586 posts
Posted on 3/27/18 at 9:59 am to
They need to reinstate a test and property owner mandate.
Posted by TheHarahanian
Actually not Harahan as of 6/2023
Member since May 2017
19504 posts
Posted on 3/27/18 at 10:03 am to
quote:

property owner


It makes sense to have a property owner qualification. It makes a person a shareholder.
Posted by SirWinston
PNW
Member since Jul 2014
81423 posts
Posted on 3/27/18 at 10:05 am to
quote:


It makes sense to have a property owner qualification. It makes a person a shareholder.


Even if you could get it through (zero chance), you'd have PACS buying up parcels of land in Mississippi and selling 1/82nd an acre for $1 with the fees being paid by same PAC in order to gain eligibility for Dem voters.

wouldn't work today.
This post was edited on 3/27/18 at 10:06 am
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
162209 posts
Posted on 3/27/18 at 10:05 am to
quote:


It makes sense to have a property owner qualification. It makes a person a shareholder.


It's a pretty stupid qualification to be honest

If someone makes 150K a year and pays plenty of taxes but prefers to rent for mobility reasons you think they shouldn't be allowed to vote?
Posted by StraightCashHomey21
Aberdeen,NC
Member since Jul 2009
125398 posts
Posted on 3/27/18 at 10:06 am to
quote:

It blew my mind to hear it stated black black men got the vote like 45 years sooner than white women. I think I knew the approximate dates and all, but I'd never heard the facts pieced together like that. Ever. And I'm a political junkie.


That's all women, but change it to white to fit your narrative.
Posted by kingbob
Sorrento, LA
Member since Nov 2010
67027 posts
Posted on 3/27/18 at 10:06 am to
And confederate veterans (i.e. nearly every white male in the south due to conscription) couldn’t vote from 1965-1877. That’s what spawned the KKK and caused the Battle of Liberty Place leading to the end of reconstruction.
This post was edited on 3/27/18 at 10:42 am
Posted by StraightCashHomey21
Aberdeen,NC
Member since Jul 2009
125398 posts
Posted on 3/27/18 at 10:10 am to
quote:

They need to reinstate a test and property owner mandate.




sack up pussies
Posted by Wtodd
Tampa, FL
Member since Oct 2013
67482 posts
Posted on 3/27/18 at 10:10 am to
quote:

Yup its pretty much been even steven besides those 14 years

But a 14 yr head start is a long arse time
Posted by Kujo
225-911-5736
Member since Dec 2015
6015 posts
Posted on 3/27/18 at 10:10 am to
Ha, someone would offer to buy it from them for $1.01 and ~80% would sell.
Posted by SirWinston
PNW
Member since Jul 2014
81423 posts
Posted on 3/27/18 at 10:11 am to
Not to fit my narrative, but to fit reality. White women were definitely treated better than black men, so it's very surprising that they were denied the vote for so much longer.
Posted by Gr8t8s
Member since Oct 2009
2579 posts
Posted on 3/27/18 at 10:16 am to
quote:

White women were definitely treated better than black men, so it's very surprising that they were denied the vote for so much longer.


Well, the white womenz was too busy fixin sammiches in the kitchen to worry about voting.
Posted by StraightCashHomey21
Aberdeen,NC
Member since Jul 2009
125398 posts
Posted on 3/27/18 at 10:17 am to
quote:

Not to fit my narrative, but to fit reality. White women were definitely treated better than black men, so it's very surprising that they were denied the vote for so much longer.


like i said it was all women in general
Posted by Bison
Truth or Consequences
Member since Dec 2016
1235 posts
Posted on 3/27/18 at 10:44 am to
After federal troops pulled out of the south, Southern whites used intimidation and violence to deter many blacks from voting . This included lynching , castrations and other vile acts. It was this way that whites where able to regain much of the political power that had been stripped after loosing the civil war. without federal troops to enforce free and fair elections , whites were able to keep blacks marginalized for many decades after reconstruction.
Reconstruction turned out be a huge failure for blacks. also whites forced blacks to pass ridiculously difficult “literacy tests” that most whites could not even pass. These tests can be found online. so yes , under federal law blacks were granted the right to vote but southern whites pulled out all the stops to fix elections in their favor. When the confederates got back political power positions like Sheriff and Judge, in small towns there was not really anyone to file greivence with. Many blacks had to return to their former lives of indentured servitude as sharecroppers.
This post was edited on 3/27/18 at 10:47 am
Posted by narddogg81
Vancouver
Member since Jan 2012
19677 posts
Posted on 3/27/18 at 11:45 am to
Universal suffrage was the worst thing to ever happen to the country. I don't think property ownership is the proper qualification, but you should have to be able to pass the citizenship test regardless of where you were born, and do some sort of public service (military of civil service) to be a voting citizen.
Posted by TerryDawg03
The Deep South
Member since Dec 2012
15675 posts
Posted on 3/27/18 at 11:51 am to
quote:

If someone makes 150K a year and pays plenty of taxes but prefers to rent for mobility reasons you think they shouldn't be allowed to vote?


I actually agree that if someone is a citizen and a net tax contributor (pays more in than they get), there should be consideration for them to vote.

There are landowners who contribute less in taxes to the government than non landowners (particularly those with tax breaks due to easements, etc).

It’s a valid point.
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
67724 posts
Posted on 3/27/18 at 11:53 am to
Goes to show that there is inequality even between whites.

Shocking.
Posted by BigJim
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2010
14485 posts
Posted on 3/27/18 at 11:54 am to
quote:

Reconstruction turned out be a huge failure for blacks.


Minor quibble (that you probably agree with)

I won't so much call reconstruction a failure as that any progress made during that period was undone during the post-reconstruction period.

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram