Started By
Message

re: They killed him

Posted on 5/20/17 at 8:11 am to
Posted by bamarep
Member since Nov 2013
51798 posts
Posted on 5/20/17 at 8:11 am to
Killah, you're trying hard brah. I'll give you that much and props for standing your ground.


However, your gun just ain't got no bullets at this point. The evidence, however circumstantial is just too overwhelming for you guys to argue innuendo as a defense. There's a mountain of it.

They killed that boy to shut him up and for what he knew. The prosecution angle just doesn't hold water for ONE reason.

Is leaking information regarding election rigging a crime? WTH would they charge him with? Being honest?

Obvious reason #2, in ANY other circumstance the DNC would have been screaming from the mountain top about Seth being killed in an upscale neighborhood with a gun. If someone isn't safe there from the evils of firearms, where would they be safe. Instead, they run from the Rich story like it has AIDS.

Gun ain't got no bullets baw.
This post was edited on 5/20/17 at 8:17 am
Posted by GFaceKillah
Welcome to the Third World
Member since Nov 2005
5935 posts
Posted on 5/20/17 at 8:15 am to
quote:

However, your gun just ain't got no bullets at this point. The evidence, however circumstantial is just too overwhelming for you guys to argue innuendo as a defense. There's a mountain of it.


What evidence? Assange hinting that he may be the leaker is the only thing you have.

quote:

Is leaking information regarding election rigging a crime? WTH would they charge him with? Being honest?


Stealing and disseminating information is a crime. He likely could have avoided prosecution as a whistleblower. That would be the angle I would go with if I was you.
Posted by bamarep
Member since Nov 2013
51798 posts
Posted on 5/20/17 at 8:18 am to
That's an extreme reach.


Exposing election fraud isn't a crime man, there's just no way you can spin this one.

Posted by Wolfhound45
Hanging with Chicken in Lurkistan
Member since Nov 2009
120000 posts
Posted on 5/20/17 at 8:20 am to
quote:

Stealing and disseminating information is a crime.
No, no it is not.

Come on baw

ETA: Think that one through bro. Hint - White House leakers.
This post was edited on 5/20/17 at 8:24 am
Posted by GFaceKillah
Welcome to the Third World
Member since Nov 2005
5935 posts
Posted on 5/20/17 at 8:21 am to
quote:

But I do find it strange that his laptop was taken as evidence.


I don't disagree with you there. Look, I'm just pointing out the fact that there is basically no concrete evidence that supports the assassination theory. The circumstances of his death are unusual and that has caused this controversy. But the unusual circumstances of his death do not in any way prove that he was murdered by the DNC/Hillary or even really point to a cover up.
Posted by GFaceKillah
Welcome to the Third World
Member since Nov 2005
5935 posts
Posted on 5/20/17 at 8:22 am to
quote:

Exposing election fraud isn't a crime man, there's just no way you can spin this one.




But stealing information is. You can't spin that one either.
Posted by GFaceKillah
Welcome to the Third World
Member since Nov 2005
5935 posts
Posted on 5/20/17 at 8:23 am to
quote:

No, no it is not.

Come on baw


If you stole and distributed files from the company that you work for they would undoubtedly fire and attempt to prosecute you.

ETA: Been fun guys, but I'm pulling myself out of the rabbit hole.

This post was edited on 5/20/17 at 8:27 am
Posted by Wolfhound45
Hanging with Chicken in Lurkistan
Member since Nov 2009
120000 posts
Posted on 5/20/17 at 8:26 am to
It would require a legal basis for prosecution (e.g. theft of proprietary information).

If (if) he was providing information on potential criminal activity he could (could) be covered under whistle blower statutes.

Come on bro.
Posted by berrycajun
Baton Rouge
Member since May 2016
6903 posts
Posted on 5/20/17 at 10:16 am to
Great post, Thine. Thank you for taking the time to always post what we know in our heads from all the research, but what we seldom take the time lay out for others to absorb. Keep on spreading awareness :)
Posted by ThinePreparedAni
In a sea of cognitive dissonance
Member since Mar 2013
11089 posts
Posted on 5/20/17 at 1:46 pm to
Medium - 05/20/17

quote:

Someone Just Edited Seth Rich’s Reddit Posts


quote:

I am not writing this article to accuse anyone of anything. If Reddit administrators deleted the personal information tying a murder victim to his Reddit account after it was found by online sleuths, and if they feel they had a good reason for doing it the way they did, I am sure we’re all open to hearing their reasoning. But that information is key to piecing together data that could quite literally save the world, and we need to pay attention to this sort of thing and have a public debate about it. Tensions between the United States and Russia have reached such insane heights that an expert analyst has said we are in more danger of nuclear annihilation in some ways than we were at the peak of the last Cold War, and the reasons being given to the public for those tensions are all based first and foremost on allegations that Russian hackers stole the Democratic party emails that were released by WikiLeaks. This isn’t just about Seth Rich; we’ve all got a stake in this thing.




quote:

Note that there is no asterisk next to the post in the archived version, which means that as of the date that the archive was made (yesterday), it had not been tampered with. This proves that the editing was recent, which proves, obviously, that it was not edited by Rich. If you go to page six in the “comments” section of Rich’s Reddit account now, you will see this version of the post instead:




quote:

My theory, while I have your attention, is that Seth Rich was not just assassinated because he was the DNC leaker, but also because he knew he was the DNC leaker. America’s unelected power establishment wants to depose Assad to secure its crucial position in the fossil fuel battles and squeeze the Kremlin hard so it stops taking bold actions like allying with the Syrian government, annexing the strategically important Crimean peninsula, and collaborating with China to undermine the hegemony of the US dollar in that region. If Rich had been able to step forward and let everyone know that he was WikiLeaks’ source and not Russia, the American people would never consent to these potentially world-ending escalations with a nuclear superpower, and America’s deep state would lose geopolitical power and influence. Can’t have that. Dead men tell no tales. So. There’s that. Let’s talk about this.



Posted by Lsuchs
Member since Apr 2013
8073 posts
Posted on 5/20/17 at 3:03 pm to
quote:

Why have him killed if he was leaking information? Why not just have him arrested? He would be the perfect scapegoat. But they killed him to "teach him a lesson" I've been told on here.

Literally couldn't be more wrong.

Theory is he was killed so they could use the Russian narrative, letting it get out that it was an internal leak would hurt that narrative
This post was edited on 5/20/17 at 3:11 pm
Posted by GeauxLSUGeaux
1 room down from Erin Andrews
Member since May 2004
23302 posts
Posted on 5/20/17 at 3:20 pm to


Posted by Boudin
Lafayette
Member since Oct 2006
10133 posts
Posted on 5/20/17 at 6:47 pm to
quote:

Theory is he was killed so they could use the Russian narrative, letting it get out that it was an internal leak would hurt that narrative

Wasn't he killed before the leaks were out? In July of '16

and Wikileaks released the Podesta emails in Oct and Nov of '16


The culprits/DNC knew he
1 Was openly in opposition of Hillary nomination
2 In contact with Wikileaks
3 Had access to or taken sensitive info


He was killed to prevent the leaks. Not retribution for leaks. They had no idea what the damage would be at the time, or that it had already been done. It was preventative measures.


Posted by berrycajun
Baton Rouge
Member since May 2016
6903 posts
Posted on 5/22/17 at 10:26 am to
What's the significance of the little dnc staffers/ctr and media matters people in your post?
Posted by berrycajun
Baton Rouge
Member since May 2016
6903 posts
Posted on 5/22/17 at 10:27 am to
And what does that tweet from Andrew about pandas mean? I know Seth liked pandas, but not sure what that means
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram