Started By
Message

re: The political agenda of a man born with silver spoons in every orifice

Posted on 4/11/14 at 4:15 pm to
Posted by UsingUpAllTheLetters
Stuck in Transfer Portal
Member since Aug 2011
8508 posts
Posted on 4/11/14 at 4:15 pm to
quote:

It was never designed to insure everyone. It was YOUR OWN PARTY that has always fought tooth and nail against universal coverage. Obama and the Democrats took what they felt like they could get.


From the CBO:
quote:

CBO and JCT now estimate that the ACA, in comparison with prior law before
the enactment of the ACA, will reduce the number of nonelderly people without
health insurance coverage by 14 million in 2014 and by 29 million or 30 million
in the latter part of the coming decade


Full context, it's on page 13:
CBO report on ACA intent and outcome.
Posted by Antonio Moss
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2006
48309 posts
Posted on 4/11/14 at 4:42 pm to
quote:

It was YOUR OWN PARTY that has always fought tooth and nail against universal coverage.


How has that worked out for Vermont?
Posted by Rex
Here, there, and nowhere
Member since Sep 2004
66001 posts
Posted on 4/11/14 at 4:45 pm to
quote:

How has that worked out for Vermont?

I don't know. I know that's it worked pretty well for the UK, France, Canada, Germany, Japan, Australia, Ireland, and New Zealand, though.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
123887 posts
Posted on 4/11/14 at 4:46 pm to
quote:

It was never designed to insure everyone
Posted by KCT
Psalm 23:5
Member since Feb 2010
38911 posts
Posted on 4/11/14 at 4:50 pm to
It's a good thing Will Rogers never met you, Rexella.

The streak would've been broken.
Posted by Antonio Moss
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2006
48309 posts
Posted on 4/11/14 at 4:52 pm to
quote:

I don't know. I know that's it worked pretty well for the UK, France, Canada, Germany, Japan, Australia, Ireland, and New Zealand, though.


If you call lower quality, less access, and annual deficits "well."
Posted by ironsides
Nashville, TN
Member since May 2006
8153 posts
Posted on 4/11/14 at 4:54 pm to
quote:

I don't know.


Is the only statement that you've made in the last week that's been correct.

quote:

it worked pretty well for the UK, France, Canada, Germany, Japan, Australia, Ireland, and New Zealand, though


All countries that have their defense subsidized by the US, and all countries that don't provide coverage to illegals. All countries that have some form of care that provide better coverage for those born with silver spoons in every orifice.

Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
66481 posts
Posted on 4/11/14 at 4:55 pm to
quote:

It was YOUR OWN PARTY that has always fought tooth and nail against universal coverage


and if MY OWN PARTY got its way we wouldn't be paying out the arse so 1.5% more people can get their health insurance paid for.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
123887 posts
Posted on 4/11/14 at 4:58 pm to
quote:

If you call lower quality, less access, and annual deficits "well."
Neaux.

He does call ignorance bliss though.
Posted by UsingUpAllTheLetters
Stuck in Transfer Portal
Member since Aug 2011
8508 posts
Posted on 4/11/14 at 7:12 pm to
quote:

Germany

I can say from personal experience, the costs outweigh the benefits.
Posted by LongueCarabine
Pointe Aux Pins, LA
Member since Jan 2011
8205 posts
Posted on 4/11/14 at 10:11 pm to
quote:

For one thing, the ACA is most definitely not a debacle, directly leading to the lowest rate of uninsured Americans in decades, but to deliberately misrepresent Jefferson's attitudes toward government is pretty indicative and typical of the methods employed by rightwingers, whether fatcats or merely stupid.


:lol: :lol:

Never heard of that old maxim "Whenever you find yourself in a hole, the first thing you do is stop digging" have you?

LC
Posted by redandright
Member since Jun 2011
9616 posts
Posted on 4/11/14 at 10:26 pm to
quote:

He knew that no government could possibly run citizens' lives for the better. The more government tries to control, the greater the disaster, as shown by the current health-care debacle.


quote:

but to deliberately misrepresent Jefferson's attitudes toward government is pretty indicative and typical of the methods employed by rightwingers


Yep, everybody knows that Jefferson was for big government.

I guess that's why he distrusted cities so much, and dreamt of a predominantly agrarian nation.
Posted by redandright
Member since Jun 2011
9616 posts
Posted on 4/11/14 at 10:33 pm to
Oh, and BTW Jefferson was such a financial genius, that he was so broke, that he had to sell his personal library to the US for the cash.

Seems as if he had a problem with buying things with money he didn't have.

He died in debt. Yep, the Father of today's Democrat Party. Go figure.
Posted by SuperSaint
Sorting Out OT BS Since '2007'
Member since Sep 2007
140462 posts
Posted on 4/12/14 at 12:34 am to
quote:

David Koch ran as the Libertarian Party's vice-presidential candidate in 1980. His brother, Charles, wrote a WSJ editorial last week in favor of plutocracy that was warmly greeted by his Republican whores in Congress.

The Koch brothers, of course, have never had to worry about a dime in their lives, and is there ANYTHING more stupid than the Libertarian Party? Privatization of roads and bridges and inland streams, indeed.

Rex the website "forwardprogressives" is going to fry what's left of your brain.

One of my favorites out of this article about the Koch brothers...

quote:

Many conservatives blindly support almost anything the GOP tells them to support without an inkling of an idea about the real force that’s almost singlehandedly buying their entire party.
Pot meet Kettle

LINK


“We urge the repeal of federal campaign finance laws, and the immediate abolition of the despotic Federal Election Commission.”

“We favor the abolition of Medicare and Medicaid programs.”

“We oppose any compulsory insurance or tax-supported plan to provide health services, including those which finance abortion services.”

“We also favor the deregulation of the medical insurance industry.”

“We favor the repeal of the fraudulent, virtually bankrupt, and increasingly oppressive Social Security system. Pending that repeal, participation in Social Security should be made voluntary.”

“We propose the abolition of the governmental Postal Service. The present system, in addition to being inefficient, encourages governmental surveillance of private correspondence. Pending abolition, we call for an end to the monopoly system and for allowing free competition in all aspects of postal service.”

“We oppose all personal and corporate income taxation, including capital gains taxes.”

“We support the eventual repeal of all taxation.”

“As an interim measure, all criminal and civil sanctions against tax evasion should be terminated immediately.”

“We support repealof all law which impede the ability of any person to find employment, such as minimum wage laws.”

“We advocate the complete separation of education and State. Government schools lead to the indoctrination of children and interfere with the free choice of individuals. Government ownership, operation, regulation, and subsidy of schools and colleges should be ended.”

“We condemn compulsory education laws … and we call for the immediate repeal of such laws.”

“We support the repeal of all taxes on the income or property of private schools, whether profit or non-profit.”

“We support the abolition of the Environmental Protection Agency.”

“We support abolition of the Department of Energy.”

“We call for the dissolution of all government agencies concerned with transportation, including the Department of Transportation.”

“We demand the return of America’s railroad system to private ownership. We call for the privatization of the public roads and national highway system.”

“We specifically oppose laws requiring an individual to buy or use so-called “self-protection” equipment such as safety belts, air bags, or crash helmets.”

“We advocate the abolition of the Federal Aviation Administration.”

“We advocate the abolition of the Food and Drug Administration.”

“We support an end to all subsidies for child-bearing built into our present laws, including all welfare plans and the provision of tax-supported services for children.”

“We oppose all government welfare, relief projects, and ‘aid to the poor’ programs. All these government programs are privacy-invading, paternalistic, demeaning, and inefficient. The proper source of help for such persons is the voluntary efforts of private groups and individuals.”

“We call for the privatization of the inland waterways, and of the distribution system that brings water to industry, agriculture and households.”

“We call for the repeal of the Occupational Safety and Health Act.”

“We call for the abolition of the Consumer Product Safety Commission.”

“We support the repeal of all state usury laws.”
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
57222 posts
Posted on 4/12/14 at 1:19 am to
quote:

. I know that's it worked pretty well for the UK, France, Canada, Germany, Japan, Australia, Ireland, and New Zealand, though.


Posted by Bestbank Tiger
Premium Member
Member since Jan 2005
71045 posts
Posted on 4/12/14 at 8:01 am to
quote:

Thomas Jefferson to James Madison, regarding the concentration of wealth and power:


Which became a lot more concentrated at the top under your Messiah.
Posted by tigernation56
im the woods
Member since Feb 2013
4771 posts
Posted on 4/12/14 at 8:02 am to
quote:

I'll leave you to guess who campaigned to have all these abolished:



dumb azz koch brothers
Posted by redandright
Member since Jun 2011
9616 posts
Posted on 4/12/14 at 9:28 am to
Jefferson also had no problem with the bloody Reign of Terror in France, and thought he could keep the US from being dragged into the war between the French and the Brits, and enacted policies to prevent involvement-he thought, which led to a huge economic downturn in the US.

You know, just because you're right on some things, doesn't make you right on everything else.
Posted by Antonio Moss
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2006
48309 posts
Posted on 4/12/14 at 9:38 am to
quote:

Jefferson also had no problem with the bloody Reign of Terror in France


It was an internal revolution that was due because of an unjust and tyrannical French government. Why would Jefferson intercede?

quote:

and thought he could keep the US from being dragged into the war between the French and the Brits, and enacted policies to prevent involvement-he thought, which led to a huge economic downturn in the US.


So Jefferson is to blame for Napoleon's failed Continental Blockade and the British's blockade in response?

And we stayed out of the conflict until the British started sinking US merchant ships in the Atlantic.

Study a freaking history book.
Posted by redandright
Member since Jun 2011
9616 posts
Posted on 4/12/14 at 10:27 am to
quote:

It was an internal revolution that was due because of an unjust and tyrannical French government. Why would Jefferson intercede?


Exactly where did I say Jefferson should intercede. And the Revolution was over by the time Jefferson became president. Maybe you need to read an history book.

As Secretary of State, Jefferson was anything but neutral. He was pro-French then,and did much to undermine Washington, as Washington tried to protect the US from harassment from both the Brits and the French.

There was never a question of the US being involved. It was how the representatives of the Directoire were to be treated, and how the revolutionary government was to be dealt with. Jefferson actually conspired with the French Minister Edmond Genet behind Washington's back to stir up trouble in Kentucky and Louisiana, and generally cause problems with the Brits. He was incredibly disloyal to Washington, and his meddling caused many problems for Washington.


He allowed his personal hatred of all things British to influence his support for a revolution that had spiralled down into a wholesale slaughter, as Secretary of State he threw his lot in so much with the French, that he painted himself into a corner by the time he became president. Those actions prior to his presidency, and his attempt to thread the needle signalled an hostility to Britain, that merely gave it an excuse to act aggressively to the US. Which led to US involvement in the War of 1812.

My point is that just because Jefferson was correct on many things, inalienable rights, etc, doesn't make him infallible.

Oh, and as far as reading history books. I have a degree in history, with an emphasis on British History from the time of the Tudors to the mid-20th century.





This post was edited on 4/12/14 at 10:34 am
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram