- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
The lawyer arguing in favor of the US government is incompetent
Posted on 2/7/17 at 5:14 pm
Posted on 2/7/17 at 5:14 pm
My goodness, he is getting destroyed, and I don't know shite about law.
The judge question "do you have any evidence implicating these countries in terrorism?" he started blabbering about nothing
His answer should have been
"Yes your Honor, ISIS is thriving in these countries, and occupy lot of land, about 20 % of the population are ISIS fighters, You do the math"
He will lose bigly, not sure if he can win even in front of a conservative supreme court.
The judge question "do you have any evidence implicating these countries in terrorism?" he started blabbering about nothing
His answer should have been
"Yes your Honor, ISIS is thriving in these countries, and occupy lot of land, about 20 % of the population are ISIS fighters, You do the math"
He will lose bigly, not sure if he can win even in front of a conservative supreme court.
This post was edited on 2/7/17 at 5:23 pm
23
Posted on 2/7/17 at 5:15 pm to Northwestern tiger
FAKE HEARING! Sad!
Posted on 2/7/17 at 5:16 pm to Northwestern tiger
Justice Department is still filled with Obama people.
Posted on 2/7/17 at 5:16 pm to Northwestern tiger
This is bad. I don't think they can raise arguments at sct that they dont make here
Posted on 2/7/17 at 5:16 pm to Northwestern tiger
This isn't a debate about evidence.
It's a debate about the ability of the Judicial branch to override the explicit authority of the executive branch spelled out in the US Constitution.
The rest is just grandstanding by the 9th circuit.
It's a debate about the ability of the Judicial branch to override the explicit authority of the executive branch spelled out in the US Constitution.
The rest is just grandstanding by the 9th circuit.
Posted on 2/7/17 at 5:16 pm to Northwestern tiger
quote:
do you have any evidence implicating these countries in terrorism?
My answer
"Is that a serious question?"
Posted on 2/7/17 at 5:16 pm to Northwestern tiger
quote:You do realize judges make decisions based on their own interpretations of the law and not what each side argues, correct?
not sure if he can win even in front of a conservative supreme court.
Posted on 2/7/17 at 5:16 pm to Northwestern tiger
I'm thinking Trump wants to lose this round, then win in the Supreme Court.
Posted on 2/7/17 at 5:17 pm to Northwestern tiger
quote:
Listning to the lawyer arguing in favor of the US goverment
quote:The bolded words should be sufficient to connect the dots.
My goodness, he is so incompetent
Posted on 2/7/17 at 5:17 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
You do realize judges make decisions based on their own interpretations of the law and not what each side argues, correct?
why are we in this shithole of a mess then?
Posted on 2/7/17 at 5:17 pm to KosmoCramer
quote:
This isn't a debate about evidence. It's a debate about the ability of the Judicial branch to override the explicit authority of the executive branch spelled out in the US Constitution. The rest is just grandstanding by the 9th circuit.
Ding ding ding
This is a balancing of powers issue not an immigration issue.
Posted on 2/7/17 at 5:17 pm to KosmoCramer
^^^^^^^
Posted on 2/7/17 at 5:18 pm to baybeefeetz
quote:They can't raise arguments here they didn't raise in WA either
This is bad. I don't think they can raise arguments at sct that they dont make here
This is just on the stay, though, they'll be able to raise all kinds of arguments on the merits
But whoever was running the show in W.D.Wa really got lazy
Posted on 2/7/17 at 5:18 pm to Northwestern tiger
ipse dixit arguments of counsel is not evidence
Posted on 2/7/17 at 5:19 pm to Northwestern tiger
It's the crazy liberal 9th circuit dude. Who gives a shite?
You could have the best conservative legal scholar in the world on your side and those hacks on the 9th would still rule against you.
SCOTUS is where its at and why we need to get Gorsuch confirmed.
You could have the best conservative legal scholar in the world on your side and those hacks on the 9th would still rule against you.
SCOTUS is where its at and why we need to get Gorsuch confirmed.
Posted on 2/7/17 at 5:20 pm to Northwestern tiger
Oral arguments aren't that important, so I've heard. I guess if someone was really unprepared or had absolutely nothing coherent to say, it might lose the case for them.
Posted on 2/7/17 at 5:20 pm to UHTiger
I love how judges on the FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT are literally aggressively cross examining the US DOJ over useless facts, when the real question that they explicitly know is about separation of powers.
It's actually scary to listen to.
It's actually scary to listen to.
Posted on 2/7/17 at 5:20 pm to Jim Rockford
he is choking bigly now
Posted on 2/7/17 at 5:21 pm to Northwestern tiger
He has a fool for a client
Posted on 2/7/17 at 5:22 pm to Northwestern tiger
There is a Chinese curse which says “May he live in interesting times.” Like it or not, we live in interesting times. - RFK quote
The left is trying to turn us into a Banana Republic.
The left is trying to turn us into a Banana Republic.
Page 1 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News