Started By
Message

re: The FDA drives up the cost of health care and kills people

Posted on 2/11/17 at 12:47 pm to
Posted by I B Freeman
Member since Oct 2009
27843 posts
Posted on 2/11/17 at 12:47 pm to
quote:

Thalidomide

/thread


There have been more people killed from lack of access to drugs than from thalidomide.

/thread

BTW--I would support a government financed research facility to verify claims of drug companies BUT not to limit access to drugs.

Lakeboy will tell you we have plenty of tort remedies to keep drug marketers in line.

No modern drug company would absent FDA corruption bring a drug to market they knew to be harmful. Today the FDA legitimizes drugs that may be harmful.
This post was edited on 2/11/17 at 12:54 pm
Posted by mmcgrath
Indianapolis
Member since Feb 2010
35476 posts
Posted on 2/11/17 at 12:55 pm to
quote:

The FDA creates the barrier to competition that allows the outsized pricing---IDIOT.
Congress does that via patent law. But sure, let's throw out an entire agency because a handful of companies are price gouging.
Posted by I B Freeman
Member since Oct 2009
27843 posts
Posted on 2/11/17 at 12:58 pm to
quote:

But sure, let's throw out an entire agency because an entire industry is price gouging.



FIFY
Posted by mmcgrath
Indianapolis
Member since Feb 2010
35476 posts
Posted on 2/11/17 at 12:59 pm to
quote:

Consumers "regulate" absent government intervention
The company in your OP is ripping off sick patients. How are consumers doing when they have to regulate on their own? Now take away the need to prove they aren't just selling a placebo.
This post was edited on 2/11/17 at 1:00 pm
Posted by I B Freeman
Member since Oct 2009
27843 posts
Posted on 2/11/17 at 1:05 pm to
quote:

Now take away the need to prove they aren't just selling a placebo.


That is fraud.

It is a criminal act and we have 50 state laws about that and several federal laws.

We have a tort system that bankrupts bad operators.

Why do we want a bunch of lazy bureaucrats between us and health care choices?
This post was edited on 2/11/17 at 1:06 pm
Posted by I B Freeman
Member since Oct 2009
27843 posts
Posted on 2/11/17 at 1:06 pm to
quote:

The company in your OP is ripping off sick patients


And can because of the FDA and you support it.
Posted by mmcgrath
Indianapolis
Member since Feb 2010
35476 posts
Posted on 2/11/17 at 1:27 pm to
quote:

That is fraud.

It is a criminal act and we have 50 state laws about that and several federal laws.

We have a tort system that bankrupts bad operators.

Why do we want a bunch of lazy bureaucrats between us and health care choices?
So dying patients will have time to sue bad drug companies in court? So now the burden of proof is on sick people to prove that drugs don't work?
Posted by Jyrdis
TD Premium Member Level III
Member since Aug 2015
12814 posts
Posted on 2/11/17 at 1:27 pm to
I'd be in favor of reducing patent lengths and FDA regulation. I personally think patent length is too long. Reduce it and we may see more efficiency in drug R&D and costs.
Posted by MoarKilometers
Member since Apr 2015
18085 posts
Posted on 2/11/17 at 1:31 pm to
quote:

I don't see the population of Mexico suffering because they do not regulate prescription drugs? do you?

You're joking, right?
Posted by I B Freeman
Member since Oct 2009
27843 posts
Posted on 2/11/17 at 1:35 pm to
quote:

I don't see the population of Mexico suffering because they do not regulate prescription drugs? do you?

You're joking, right?


No. The population of Mexico has suffering no doubt but none that I see arising from the fact they do not pay a doctor for a prescription, a pharmacy for filling a prescription and a drug company protected from competition.
Posted by I B Freeman
Member since Oct 2009
27843 posts
Posted on 2/11/17 at 1:37 pm to
quote:

So dying patients will have time to sue bad drug companies in court?


Do they have standing or time to sue the FDA because life saving drugs are not available to them?

Your reach is pathetic.

Why would you buy a drug you do not trust? do you need some faceless bureaucrat to reassure you that the drugs you take are ok? do you think he does his job given the hundreds of cases of FDA approved drugs harming people?
This post was edited on 2/11/17 at 1:40 pm
Posted by I B Freeman
Member since Oct 2009
27843 posts
Posted on 2/11/17 at 1:39 pm to
quote:

patent lengths


I don't think the lengths are the actual problem. New compounds should have full patent protection but new uses of existing compounds really shouldn't have patent protection or FDA protection.
Posted by I B Freeman
Member since Oct 2009
27843 posts
Posted on 2/11/17 at 1:41 pm to
At the end of the day McGrath supports the profit protection the FDA creates for drug companies at the expense of consumers.

I got it.

This post was edited on 2/11/17 at 1:43 pm
Posted by BamaAtl
South of North
Member since Dec 2009
21957 posts
Posted on 2/11/17 at 1:54 pm to
quote:

lack of access to drugs


lack of access to -safe- drugs. That word is important.
Posted by mmcgrath
Indianapolis
Member since Feb 2010
35476 posts
Posted on 2/11/17 at 2:08 pm to
quote:

No. The population of Mexico has suffering no doubt but none that I see arising from the fact they do not pay a doctor for a prescription, a pharmacy for filling a prescription and a drug company protected from competition.
Mexico has their own version of an fda.
Posted by I B Freeman
Member since Oct 2009
27843 posts
Posted on 2/11/17 at 3:20 pm to
But I can walk into any Walmart down there and buy almost any non narcotic without a prescription and they certainly do not have a bureaucracy that is so large it curtails competition and reduces choices for citizens as the FDA does.

No one--not even the FDA's biggest proponent--can say that 1) the FDA through their policies does not add billions to the cost of drugs for US citizens 2) the FDA through their policies makes does not reduce access to proven drugs and possible very effective drugs for US citizens.

I know a lot of people prefer the bureaucracy over the people and you are one of them.
This post was edited on 2/11/17 at 3:24 pm
Posted by mmcgrath
Indianapolis
Member since Feb 2010
35476 posts
Posted on 2/11/17 at 3:27 pm to
quote:

But I can walk into any Walmart down there and buy almost any non narcotic without a prescription
Congress, again. The FDA enforces that law, but they did not make it up.

Why don't you just ask your legislator to allow all drugs to be made available over the counter. That should get a warm reception.
Posted by I B Freeman
Member since Oct 2009
27843 posts
Posted on 2/11/17 at 3:29 pm to
quote:

Why don't you just ask your legislator to allow all drugs to be made available over the counter. That should get a warm reception.


Why don't you just ask him to double all our taxes and send it to your friends the drug companies?

It's obvious you want to protect them at the financial expense of and the health of the US citizens.
This post was edited on 2/11/17 at 3:31 pm
Posted by mmcgrath
Indianapolis
Member since Feb 2010
35476 posts
Posted on 2/11/17 at 3:33 pm to
quote:

Why don't you just ask him to double all our taxes and send it to your friends the drug companies?
That's a false equivalency.

Tell me what you want changed. Do you want all drugs available without a perscription or no? Do you want morphine available in all forms and advertised as a health supplement or not?
Posted by I B Freeman
Member since Oct 2009
27843 posts
Posted on 2/11/17 at 3:36 pm to
Tell me why you like the FDA. You have yet to refute a single assertion I have made.

We would be better off without the FDA--certainly no worse--was my original assertion and it still stands unchallenged in this thread.

first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram