Started By
Message

re: The definition of the word "conservative"

Posted on 6/10/14 at 12:50 am to
Posted by Vegas Bengal
Member since Feb 2008
26344 posts
Posted on 6/10/14 at 12:50 am to
Are you Andy Rooney IRL? Didn't you die?
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
69341 posts
Posted on 6/10/14 at 12:55 am to
But if you accept the two definitions to be valid, then conservatives look like absolutely horrible people throughout history, and liberals can be thanked for literally every single reform, since the improvement of society necessarily implies change.

If conservatism needs the preservation of the status quo, then nearly every single bad thing that has happened in history has been the result of conservatism.
This post was edited on 6/10/14 at 12:57 am
Posted by Vols&Shaft83
Throbbing Member
Member since Dec 2012
69925 posts
Posted on 6/10/14 at 12:58 am to
fricking idiot- (See Tigah in the ATL)
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
261144 posts
Posted on 6/10/14 at 1:04 am to
It's about as relevant as this partial definition of liberal

quote:


3.
of, pertaining to, based on, or advocating liberalism, especially the freedom of the individual and governmental guarantees of individual rights and liberties.
4.
favorable to or in accord with concepts of maximum individual freedom possible, especially as guaranteed by law and secured by governmental protection of civil liberties.
Posted by Yat27
Austin
Member since Nov 2010
8109 posts
Posted on 6/10/14 at 1:06 am to
Yeah, I almost made a post with those.

If those are the definitions we're using, I'm one extremely liberal SOB.
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
69341 posts
Posted on 6/10/14 at 1:09 am to
I guess "liberals" are severe conservatives when it comes to maintaining the war on poverty, the establishing of charter schools, and government regulation.

But seriously, if all great moments in history involved change, then necessarily conservatives have never done anything great.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
261144 posts
Posted on 6/10/14 at 1:10 am to
quote:


If those are the definitions we're using, I'm one extremely liberal SOB.





Yeah, never thought I was a liberal. Who knew? Freedom of the individual.
Posted by Anfield Road
Liverpool Fan
Member since May 2012
1940 posts
Posted on 6/10/14 at 1:33 am to
Well American conservatism fits many of the tenets of classical liberalism (i.e. support of free markets). The Liberal Party IS the conservative party in Australia.
Posted by PrimeTime Money
Houston, Texas, USA
Member since Nov 2012
27321 posts
Posted on 6/10/14 at 7:09 am to
quote:

If that's the case, hell the founding father's would be considered liberals.
They were. Look up "classical liberal" on Google or Wikipedia.

The British supporters were conservative.
Posted by catholictigerfan
Member since Oct 2009
56025 posts
Posted on 6/10/14 at 7:15 am to
you understand that during the french revolution "conservatives" were the ones who wanted to keep the monarchy in france?

Conservative is a relative term and you can't look at different time periods and say that Today's conservatives have this issue because they supported this in 1980, this in 1940, the french conservatives supported this in 1790, etc.

I don't like the terms conservative and liberal that much and this one of those reasons. It is a relative term that changes over time. A libertarian who would be considered very socially liberal but economically conservative were the liberals back in the 70s and 80s.

Look at people's stance on the issues not if the label themselves conservative liberal, progressive, libertarian, etc.
Posted by MJM
Member since Aug 2007
2485 posts
Posted on 6/10/14 at 7:37 am to
quote:

If conservatism needs the preservation of the status quo, then nearly every single bad thing that has happened in history has been the result of conservatism

I can get behind this
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
112554 posts
Posted on 6/10/14 at 9:20 am to
The definition is incorrect. I've explained this this many times. Here is a simple illustration:

Let us say that the status quo in the U.S. looked like this:

Marginal income tax rate of 90%.
Middle class income tax rate of 50%
Govt ownership of all energy companies

A person who supports keeping these 3 things in place would be a 'conservative' because they represent the status quo.

A person advocating slashing of income tax rates, shrinking govt and privatization would be a 'liberal' because it represents change.

The 'change' vs. 'status quo' standard left serious political discourse a long time ago.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram