Started By
Message
locked post

Thaler Wins Nobel

Posted on 10/9/17 at 3:53 pm
Posted by thetigerman
Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas
Member since Sep 2006
3630 posts
Posted on 10/9/17 at 3:53 pm
For his "nudge" theory. What is the general PT view on this "nudging?"

LINK
Posted by The Spleen
Member since Dec 2010
38865 posts
Posted on 10/9/17 at 3:55 pm to
You're going to have to tell them first if he's a liberal or conservative.
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
126962 posts
Posted on 10/9/17 at 3:55 pm to
quote:

What is the general PT view on this "nudging?"
It tells me the Nobel committee is running out of candidates to give the economics prize to....
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
50465 posts
Posted on 10/9/17 at 3:56 pm to
quote:

Far from being the rational decision-makers described in economic theory, Thaler found, people often make decisions that don't serve their best interests.




This is a Nobel-winning revelation?
Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
43337 posts
Posted on 10/9/17 at 3:57 pm to
quote:

You're going to have to tell them first if he's a liberal or conservative.


Maybe he's a socialist libertarian?
Posted by SG_Geaux
Beautiful St George
Member since Aug 2004
77968 posts
Posted on 10/9/17 at 3:58 pm to
quote:

"nudging?"


Is this similar to edging?
Posted by funnystuff
Member since Nov 2012
8330 posts
Posted on 10/9/17 at 3:59 pm to
For economists, yes, unfortunately it is. Thaler deserved it as much as anyone out there. Solid choice.
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35236 posts
Posted on 10/9/17 at 3:59 pm to
quote:

For his "nudge" theory. What is the general PT view on this "nudging?"
I think it’s interesting, and I think it's valid; I'm just not sure it works for everything we would like,especially without an “emotional” nudge.
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
126962 posts
Posted on 10/9/17 at 4:00 pm to
quote:

This is a Nobel-winning revelation?
I read Thaler's book several years ago and what he basically says is people put more importance on short-term benefits than long-term benefits in their life so the government must "nudge" them to look out longer term by using tax laws and other incentives. After all, government knows what's best for us....
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
50465 posts
Posted on 10/9/17 at 4:03 pm to
quote:

I read Thaler's book several years ago and what he basically says is people put more importance on short-term benefits than long-term benefits in their life so the government must "nudge" them to look out longer term by using tax laws and other incentives. After all, government knows what's best for us....


Yeah, they should do something like a government-run, nationwide retirement fund we all pay into. We can call it social security. It'll be great!
Posted by AbuTheMonkey
Chicago, IL
Member since May 2014
8003 posts
Posted on 10/9/17 at 4:04 pm to
U of Chicago (and Booth) get another one. That is their 29th Nobel for economics overall and the 6th just in the past decade. That is ridiculous.

I think Thaler and Kahneman's work is pretty self-evident. In Thaler's case, you can see loss aversion over and over and over again in everyday life.

Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
43337 posts
Posted on 10/9/17 at 4:07 pm to
quote:

I read Thaler's book several years ago and what he basically says is people put more importance on short-term benefits than long-term benefits in their life so the government must "nudge" them to look out longer term by using tax laws and other incentives. After all, government knows what's best for us....


If this is an accurate assessment...I think Thaler needs to study why this country went from putting more importance on long-term benefits ("protestant work ethic" of the 1800s through mid 1900s) to short-term (modern day 'Murica). The government "nudged" alright...

Government isn't the solution. It's the problem.
Posted by funnystuff
Member since Nov 2012
8330 posts
Posted on 10/9/17 at 4:07 pm to
You're talking about Nudge?

Misbehaving is far more entertaining. And it discusses a wider variety of irrationalities without getting preachy. This feels as much like one of those 'lifetime achievement' awards as any.
Posted by 90proofprofessional
Member since Mar 2004
24445 posts
Posted on 10/9/17 at 4:19 pm to
inb4 "not a real Nobel"
Posted by MrCarton
Paradise Valley, MT
Member since Dec 2009
20231 posts
Posted on 10/9/17 at 4:31 pm to
quote:

Richard Thaler of the University of Chicago on Monday won the Nobel economics prize for documenting the way people's behavior doesn't conform to economic models that portray them as perfectly rational



Rationality is not determined by the value judgements of a economists or financial advisor. In economic terms, all actors act rationally.

quote:

"Human action is necessarily always rational. The term 'rational action' is therefore pleonastic and must be rejected as such. When applied to the ultimate ends of action, the terms rational and irrational are inappropriate and meaningless. The ultimate end of action is always the satisfaction of some desires of the acting man."

Seemingly irrational action is rational, that is, has an aim. To appraise it as irrational, the appraiser merely imposes some other external source of value. Mises writes (p. 104): "However one twists things, one will never succeed in formulating the notion of 'irrational' action whose 'irrationality' is not founded upon an arbitrary judgment of value."





Thus spake Ludwig von Mises

Mises.org

My guess is the OPs article writer doesn't understand the significance of the insights of Thaler.
This post was edited on 10/9/17 at 4:42 pm
Posted by Homesick Tiger
Greenbrier, AR
Member since Nov 2006
54209 posts
Posted on 10/9/17 at 4:35 pm to
quote:

what he basically says is people put more importance on short-term benefits than long-term benefits in their life


This could be the motto for the Democratic Party.
Posted by MrCarton
Paradise Valley, MT
Member since Dec 2009
20231 posts
Posted on 10/9/17 at 4:38 pm to
quote:

I read Thaler's book several years ago and what he basically says is people put more importance on short-term benefits than long-term benefits in their life so the government must "nudge" them to look out longer term by using tax laws and other incentives. After all, government knows what's best for us....




Higher time preference is of course exacerbated in every way by the state.
Posted by MrCarton
Paradise Valley, MT
Member since Dec 2009
20231 posts
Posted on 10/9/17 at 4:41 pm to
quote:

If this is an accurate assessment...I think Thaler needs to study why this country went from putting more importance on long-term benefits ("protestant work ethic" of the 1800s through mid 1900s) to short-term (modern day 'Murica). The government "nudged" alright...

Government isn't the solution. It's the problem.


Agreed.

Chicago intellectuals tend to agree with this in many ways, but see the state as an inevitability and focus on solutions that are more "pragmatic" in a statist environment.
Posted by BeefDawg
Atlanta
Member since Sep 2012
4747 posts
Posted on 10/9/17 at 4:46 pm to
quote:

You're going to have to tell them first if he's a liberal or conservative.

When's the last time they gave this award to a Conservative?

I think that ship sailed a while ago, no?
Posted by Knight of Old
New Hampshire
Member since Jul 2007
10976 posts
Posted on 10/9/17 at 4:52 pm to
He's a behavioral scientist, no?

Says all Economics theory will now be based on behavioral science...
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram