Started By
Message
locked post

Texas approves regulation requiring burial or cremation of aborted fetuses no

Posted on 11/30/16 at 7:29 pm
Posted by Eurocat
Member since Apr 2004
15048 posts
Posted on 11/30/16 at 7:29 pm
matter how old they are, even one week, etc.

Sorry can't cut and past from this computer, here is the link, though, to the NYTimes.

LINK
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 11/30/16 at 7:30 pm to
good, frick with the pro aborts

so easy to avoid pregnancy
Posted by tiger1014
Member since Jan 2011
12511 posts
Posted on 11/30/16 at 7:31 pm to
This is ridiculous honestly.

What about spontaneous abortions? Tubal pregnancies?
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
72129 posts
Posted on 11/30/16 at 7:32 pm to
That is ridiculous.
Posted by TidenUP
Dauphin Island
Member since Apr 2011
14434 posts
Posted on 11/30/16 at 7:36 pm to
Texas is trolling at this point.
Posted by dawgfan24348
Member since Oct 2011
49303 posts
Posted on 11/30/16 at 7:39 pm to
Expect when a girl is raped
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
67989 posts
Posted on 11/30/16 at 7:41 pm to
not small gov.

not a fan

Posted by stat19
Member since Feb 2011
29350 posts
Posted on 11/30/16 at 7:44 pm to
quote:

That is ridiculous.


I don't know... helps the burial-cremation industry - stimulating the economy. More winning.

No different than adding a luxury tax.

They can just think of it as an abortion tax - only it goes to business instead of government.
Posted by GatorReb
Dallas GA
Member since Feb 2009
9280 posts
Posted on 11/30/16 at 7:48 pm to
quote:

good, frick with the pro aborts so easy to avoid pregnancy
Posted by shell01
Marianna, FL
Member since Jul 2014
793 posts
Posted on 11/30/16 at 7:49 pm to
What next, require burial of parts of humans? What about an amputated limb? Or a brain tumor? Should we require burial of those as well?
Posted by Willie Stroker
Member since Sep 2008
12907 posts
Posted on 11/30/16 at 8:01 pm to
quote:

What next, require burial of parts of humans? What about an amputated limb? Or a brain tumor? Should we require burial of those as well?



Is that even on the table? Or is "What next?" followed by something totally ridiculous, your strategy of choice for every legislative proposal?
Posted by gamatt53
Member since Nov 2010
4934 posts
Posted on 11/30/16 at 8:08 pm to
How small government conservative of them
Posted by Jimbeaux
Member since Sep 2003
20119 posts
Posted on 11/30/16 at 8:11 pm to
Seems logical, if you require that all dead people get buried/creamated, babies included. As much as pro-abortionist try to deny the facts, what happens in an abortion is that a living, human, individual organism (personhood being a metaphysical discussion) is killed. Dead humans are required to be handled in a certain way for whatever reason the law was created. Aborted fetuses are not simply lumps of undifferentiated cells.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89552 posts
Posted on 11/30/16 at 8:14 pm to
quote:

even one week


You know a woman doesn't even know she's pregnant to even got get an abortion before 10 to 12 weeks - in other words at the end of the first trimester, right?


You folks on the left are sure big on human rights, except for inconvenient ones. What did the unborn babies do to piss y'all off so badly?
Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 11/30/16 at 8:15 pm to
quote:

What next, require burial of parts of humans?


That makes no sense. Can you connect the "logic dots" as to how you arrived at that conclusion? Is it the slippery slope fallacy?
Posted by Eric Nies Grind Time
Atlanta GA - ITP
Member since Sep 2012
24937 posts
Posted on 11/30/16 at 8:18 pm to
Being hyperbolic. Edit
This post was edited on 11/30/16 at 8:26 pm
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89552 posts
Posted on 11/30/16 at 8:19 pm to
quote:

A person should be able to get rid of a parasite without burial.


We have about 100 million adults in the nation who just got nervous because you said that.
Posted by Lakeboy7
New Orleans
Member since Jul 2011
23965 posts
Posted on 11/30/16 at 8:19 pm to
Who pays?
Posted by KillTheGophers
Member since Jan 2016
6218 posts
Posted on 11/30/16 at 8:20 pm to
As a parent whose spouse and I lost a baby at the end of the 2nd trimester, I don't know how I feel about this.

The loss was painful. State law required that she had a second opinion prior to the procedure to remove the deceased fetus.

It was a painful loss and something that changed our lives.

Posted by Eric Nies Grind Time
Atlanta GA - ITP
Member since Sep 2012
24937 posts
Posted on 11/30/16 at 8:22 pm to


Fetus is actually not a parasite but I just can't possibly approve of the government telling someone what they can do with their own body.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram