Started By
Message
locked post

Tesla Sales Fall to Zero in Hong Kong After Tax Break Is Slashed

Posted on 7/10/17 at 9:35 am
Posted by Jack Ruby
Member since Apr 2014
22758 posts
Posted on 7/10/17 at 9:35 am
It's a WSJ article so cant see the whole thing, but the opening lines tell the story.


LINK
quote:


New registrations of company’s vehicles dropped to zero from 2,939

Tesla Inc.’s sales in Hong Kong came to a standstill after authorities slashed a tax break for electric vehicles on April 1, demonstrating how sensitive the company’s performance can be to government incentive programs.

Not a single newly purchased Tesla model was registered in Hong Kong in April, according to official data from the city’s..
Posted by bamarep
Member since Nov 2013
51805 posts
Posted on 7/10/17 at 9:37 am to
The company wouldn't exist without government hand outs and tax breaks.

Musk is a con man.
Posted by Turbeauxdog
Member since Aug 2004
23176 posts
Posted on 7/10/17 at 9:37 am to
Trump should do the same.

There is no justification for a taxpayer funded subsidy on a 6 figure car.
Posted by back9Tiger
Mandeville, LA.
Member since Nov 2005
14143 posts
Posted on 7/10/17 at 9:38 am to
everyone on the left wants to make Elon Musk a savior but in reality he nothing more than a subsidy from the government. If the free market does not want his product or can't afford it because it is over priced for the market, let it fail.
Posted by MrLarson
Member since Oct 2014
34984 posts
Posted on 7/10/17 at 9:40 am to
It would be bad if a guy like this was on an advisory board to the President.
Posted by SG_Geaux
Beautiful St George
Member since Aug 2004
77964 posts
Posted on 7/10/17 at 9:40 am to
quote:

There is no justification for a taxpayer funded subsidy on a 6 figure car.

Posted by Gusoline
Jacksonville, NC
Member since Dec 2013
7629 posts
Posted on 7/10/17 at 9:40 am to
poor musky might only make 30K per sale instead of 50 when hes forced to drop the price to compensate

:tinyviolin:
Posted by Turbeauxdog
Member since Aug 2004
23176 posts
Posted on 7/10/17 at 9:46 am to
quote:

poor musky might only make 30K per sale instead of 50 when hes forced to drop the price to compensate

:tinyviolin:


Um, last I checked they lose on every sale when you exclude the subsidy
Posted by Balloon Huffer
Member since Sep 2010
3421 posts
Posted on 7/10/17 at 10:06 am to
Wait a minute, so the wealthy get a SMALL PERCENTAGE of their tax money actually going to something they might enjoy ---- instead of being wasted by the hyper-inefficient government or some lazy frick not working?

Boo fricking hoo.

Posted by alphaandomega
Tuscaloosa
Member since Aug 2012
13536 posts
Posted on 7/10/17 at 10:10 am to
quote:

Um, last I checked they lose on every sale when you exclude the subsidy




Then they will not sell them. The unique thing about America is anyone can become successful. If you come up with a needed product and can produce it at a price people can afford you will become successful (and rich).

That is why the government needs to stay the hell out of business. Like all the money taxpayers flushed down the toilet by giving money to Solyndra.

Its easy... develop a product at a great price and make money, develop a crappy product or a product at too high a price and you lose your arse.
Posted by CAD703X
Liberty Island
Member since Jul 2008
78042 posts
Posted on 7/10/17 at 10:11 am to
quote:

Musk is a con man.

been saying this since the paypal days
Posted by BlackHelicopterPilot
Top secret lab
Member since Feb 2004
52833 posts
Posted on 7/10/17 at 10:18 am to
quote:

Musk is a con man.



To be fair:

1) If I had a product or service for which I could turn a profit and the Gov has a program to help....I am NOT eschewing said assistance.

2) Isn't the "subsidy" given to the consumer? I pay Tesla 100k for my car and the Fed and State (some) give ME the credit / subsidy.



Now, the car may have never sold (certainly not as many) without it. But, it is not Musk's fault that the program exists and I don't think anyone is a "con man" for using what is available.


BTW, I am AGAINST the subsidy. I just don't blame the entrepreneurs for profiting from them.
Posted by cahoots
Member since Jan 2009
9134 posts
Posted on 7/10/17 at 10:21 am to
quote:

The company wouldn't exist without government hand outs and tax breaks.

Musk is a con man.


GM and Chrysler would not exist either
Posted by OchoDedos
Republic of Texas
Member since Oct 2014
34074 posts
Posted on 7/10/17 at 10:22 am to
Likely this has to do with Volvo's announcement to make only electric vehicles by 2019. Volvo is owned by Chinese interests, likely subsidized by HSBC and other HK financial interests.
Posted by Balloon Huffer
Member since Sep 2010
3421 posts
Posted on 7/10/17 at 10:27 am to
it is a non refundable tax credit.

AKA - it only helps those who actually pay taxes. Like, pay all of the taxes that run this entire country.

Which is worse, a guy who pays $110,0000 annually in taxes getting a $17,000 tax break? While still spending $110,000 on an AMERICAN MADE product?

OR -- someone who pays a TOTAL of $1200 in taxes annually getting a $5000 REFUND? All while putting ZERO money in to the economy?

Honestly, which is worse?
Posted by SirWinston
PNW
Member since Jul 2014
81631 posts
Posted on 7/10/17 at 10:29 am to
Musk is amazingly talented at getting government cooperation. How the frick is he getting the funding and approval to test underground roads in California? It's unreal.

That's his real gift.
Posted by Machine
Earth
Member since May 2011
6001 posts
Posted on 7/10/17 at 10:30 am to
quote:

The company wouldn't exist without government hand outs and tax breaks.
eh, the oil industry would have never gained traction without government hand outs and tax breaks (some they still get today)
Posted by bamarep
Member since Nov 2013
51805 posts
Posted on 7/10/17 at 10:30 am to
quote:

That's his real gift.


Hence the con man comment.
Posted by cahoots
Member since Jan 2009
9134 posts
Posted on 7/10/17 at 10:32 am to
quote:

everyone on the left wants to make Elon Musk a savior but in reality he nothing more than a subsidy from the government. If the free market does not want his product or can't afford it because it is over priced for the market, let it fail.


Not directing this at you but conservatives hold different companies to different standards.

Under a free market, GM and Chrysler would have gone under. Ford didn't get bail out funds, but it got a generous multi-billion dollar federal loan to develop electric cars that has yet to be paid back. Also, all of those companies qualify for many of he same tax credits that Tesla utilizes. And they get huge subsidies from local and state governments, too.

Let's face it - The auto industry was not operating under free market principles long before Tesla was a thing.

So why is the criticism directed exclusively at Tesa/Musk? Y'all are cherry picking.
Posted by Turbeauxdog
Member since Aug 2004
23176 posts
Posted on 7/10/17 at 10:40 am to
quote:

generous multi-billion dollar federal loan to develop electric cars that has yet to be paid ba


Who sets cafe standards?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram