Started By
Message
locked post

Scientists get peer-reviewed journals to publish nonsense based on ‘Star Wars’ to prove a

Posted on 7/24/17 at 9:20 pm
Posted by RebelExpress38
In your base, killin your dudes
Member since Apr 2012
13545 posts
Posted on 7/24/17 at 9:20 pm
LINK


quote:

You know all of those peer-reviewed journals that “prove” man-made climate change is genuine?

It seems they may not be so peer-reviewed or accurate after all.

A neurology expert has unveiled a sting operation he embarked on to show that many of these journals will publish anything that is sent to them.

Using the names “Dr. Lucas McGeorge” and “Dr. Annette Kin,” references to “Star Wars” creator George Lucas and “Star Wars” character Anakin Skywalker, the neurologist was able to have several journals publish a paper he wrote on the fictitious “midi-chlorians.”


quote:

“Four journals fell for the sting. The American Journal of Medical and Biological Research (SciEP) accepted the paper, but asked for a $360 fee, which I didn’t pay. Amazingly, three other journals not only accepted but actually published the spoof. Here’s the paper from the International Journal of Molecular Biology: Open Access (MedCrave), Austin Journal of Pharmacology and Therapeutics (Austin) and American Research Journal of Biosciences (ARJ) I hadn’t expected this, as all those journals charge publication fees, but I never paid them a penny,” he wrote in a blog for Discover Magazine.

He called the manuscript “A travesty, which they should have rejected within about 5 minutes – or 2 minutes if the reviewer was familiar with Star Wars.”

He pointed to some of the absurd highlights.

“Beyond supplying cellular energy, midichloria perform functions such as Force sensitivity…”
“Involved in ATP production is the citric acid cycle, also referred to as the Kyloren cycle after its discoverer.”
“Midi-chlorians are microscopic life-forms that reside in all living cells – without the midi-chlorians, life couldn’t exist, and we’d have no knowledge of the force. Midichlorial disorders often erupt as brain diseases, such as autism.”
“midichloria DNA (mtDNRey)” and “ReyTP”
Posted by GRTiger
On a roof eating alligator pie
Member since Dec 2008
62935 posts
Posted on 7/24/17 at 9:23 pm to
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
57208 posts
Posted on 7/24/17 at 9:26 pm to
Not the first time this has been done.

Posted by Sidicous
Middle of Nowhere
Member since Aug 2015
17144 posts
Posted on 7/24/17 at 9:27 pm to
And now students can use these scientific journals as a legit research source for even more nonsensical papers! Looking forward to seeing these footnoted for at least a decade.
Posted by jpbTiger
Tampa FL
Member since Dec 2007
4973 posts
Posted on 7/24/17 at 9:28 pm to
quote:

Looking forward to seeing these footnoted for at least a decade.
Posted by texag7
College Station
Member since Apr 2014
37519 posts
Posted on 7/24/17 at 9:28 pm to
Peer reviewed means jack. Pretty much a glorified notary public
Posted by Tiguar
Montana
Member since Mar 2012
33131 posts
Posted on 7/24/17 at 9:29 pm to
can I get a pdf of the paper?
I have reasons.
Posted by TerryDawg03
The Deep South
Member since Dec 2012
15694 posts
Posted on 7/24/17 at 9:33 pm to
Holy shite

quote:

For transparency, I admitted what I’d done in the paper itself. The Methods section features the line “The majority of the text of this paper was Rogeted [7]”. Reference 7 cited an article on Rogeting followed by “The majority of the text in the current paper was Rogeted from Wikipedia: LINK Apologies to the original authors of that page.”


Posted by onmymedicalgrind
Nunya
Member since Dec 2012
10590 posts
Posted on 7/24/17 at 9:33 pm to
quote:

Peer reviewed means jack.

Posted by KeyserSoze999
Member since Dec 2009
10608 posts
Posted on 7/24/17 at 9:33 pm to
Climate change/global warming is such a house of cards, yet the libs get all superior and butthurt when light is shed upon all the holes. They're about as brilliant as al gore and his fake movies
This post was edited on 7/24/17 at 9:45 pm
Posted by Loserman
Member since Sep 2007
21872 posts
Posted on 7/24/17 at 9:34 pm to
Oldie but goodie from 2005. Was a scientific paper auto generator.

LINK
This post was edited on 7/24/17 at 9:35 pm
Posted by Ralph_Wiggum
Sugarland
Member since Jul 2005
10666 posts
Posted on 7/24/17 at 9:36 pm to
quote:

Peer reviewed means jack. Pretty much a glorified notary public



Yeah, I mean the New England Journal of Medicine, Lancet, and JAMA shouldn't be read by your doctors since it's all garbage.
Posted by Scoop
RIP Scoop
Member since Sep 2005
44583 posts
Posted on 7/24/17 at 9:40 pm to
So shocking.

It is well known that climate scientists play ball for funding.

I haven't been as shocked since Jim J. Bullock came out of the closet.

Posted by LordSaintly
Member since Dec 2005
38880 posts
Posted on 7/24/17 at 9:41 pm to
None of these journals appear to be reputable. In fact, they appear to be predatory publishers/scam journals, likely run out of a basement overseas.

Call me when JAMA or Nature publishes something like this.
Posted by LordSaintly
Member since Dec 2005
38880 posts
Posted on 7/24/17 at 9:43 pm to
quote:

Peer reviewed means jack.


This story doesn't support your claim.
Posted by ThinePreparedAni
In a sea of cognitive dissonance
Member since Mar 2013
11089 posts
Posted on 7/24/17 at 9:44 pm to
Posted by Errerrerrwere
Member since Aug 2015
38262 posts
Posted on 7/24/17 at 9:54 pm to
This is marvelous. Absolutely marvelous.

Has Loshy commented yet?
Posted by Crimson
Member since Jan 2013
1330 posts
Posted on 7/24/17 at 10:00 pm to
While I agree with the premise of this guy, the open access journals he chose aren't exactly peer reviewed in the strictest sense. This wouldn't have gotten through Nature or Science or Cell.
Posted by OneFifty
No favorite team now
Member since Aug 2012
3872 posts
Posted on 7/24/17 at 10:07 pm to
I think that is my affliction.

Damned midi-chlordians have got me spectrummed.
Posted by onmymedicalgrind
Nunya
Member since Dec 2012
10590 posts
Posted on 7/24/17 at 10:08 pm to
quote:

Call me when JAMA or Nature publishes something like this.

I would bet most of the people on this board couldn't distinguish between these "journals" and JAMA/NEJM/etc
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram