Started By
Message
locked post

"Russian hack" of DNC happened July 2015, before Trump announced his presidential campaign

Posted on 9/17/17 at 10:13 am
Posted by WaWaWeeWa
Member since Oct 2015
15714 posts
Posted on 9/17/17 at 10:13 am
Has this been discussed before?

According to our governments assessment
assessing Russian activities and intentions in recent elections
The breach took place in July 2015 (page 12)

Trump didn't announce his presidential campaign until July 15th, 2015

The report also goes on to say...

quote:

Putin most likely wanted to discredit Secretary Clinton because he has publicly blamed her since 2011 for inciting mass protests against his regime in late 2011 and early 2012, and because he holds a grudge for comments he almost certainly saw as disparaging him


So Russia didn't do this because they are colluding with Trump. They would have planned this well before anyone really believed Trump would be the candidate. Russia did this because like everyone else they hate that bitch Hillary
This post was edited on 9/17/17 at 12:21 pm
Posted by Revelator
Member since Nov 2008
58052 posts
Posted on 9/17/17 at 10:23 am to
Don't cloud this issue with facts!
Posted by Kraut Dawg
Member since Sep 2012
4506 posts
Posted on 9/17/17 at 10:37 am to
(no message)
This post was edited on 1/10/21 at 7:48 am
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
146950 posts
Posted on 9/17/17 at 10:37 am to
quote:

Putin most likely wanted to discredit Secretary Clinton because he has publicly blamed her since 2011 for inciting mass protests against his regime in late 2011 and early 2012, and because he holds a grudge for comments he almost certainly saw as disparaging him

So Russia didn't do this because they are colluding with Trump. They would have planned this well before anyone really believed Trump would be the candidate. Russia did this because like everyone else they hate that bitch Hillary
Precisely. HRC interfered with Putin's election so it was payback. Plain and simple.
Posted by Navytiger74
Member since Oct 2009
50458 posts
Posted on 9/17/17 at 10:41 am to
Well looks like you cracked the case. Nothing left to worry about, then.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
123945 posts
Posted on 9/17/17 at 10:50 am to
quote:

Well looks like you cracked the case. Nothing left to worry about, then.
So NT, you're in or around the field.

How do you feel about the way Hillary and the DNC dealt with cybersecurity protections, threats, and the subsequent investigation?
Posted by WaWaWeeWa
Member since Oct 2015
15714 posts
Posted on 9/17/17 at 10:54 am to
quote:

Well looks like you cracked the case. Nothing left to worry about, then.


Lulz, I did more than CNN/NYT in 5 minutes
Posted by Antonio Moss
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2006
48320 posts
Posted on 9/17/17 at 10:57 am to
quote:

Russia did this because like everyone else they hate that bitch Hillary


Yeah, well it's kind of understandable given that she most likely helped the illegal coup in the Ukraine that led to the Crimean Crisis.
Posted by chalmetteowl
Chalmette
Member since Jan 2008
47663 posts
Posted on 9/17/17 at 10:57 am to
Fake news

Trump wasn't the nominee yet, but didn't he have a big lead in delegates?????
Posted by WaWaWeeWa
Member since Oct 2015
15714 posts
Posted on 9/17/17 at 10:58 am to
Well it looks like I was wrong, the hack happened in July 2015. I will correct that

Donald Trump didn't even announce he was running for president until July 15th, 2015. So the Russian government planned this before Trump even announced he was running for president

Ha, it's even better than I thought

Credit to Kraut Dawg for the find
This post was edited on 9/17/17 at 11:04 am
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
146950 posts
Posted on 9/17/17 at 10:59 am to
quote:

Russia's US Social Media Hacking: Inside the Information War | Time.com

Like many a good spy tale, the story of how the U.S. learned its democracy could be hacked started with loose lips. In May 2016, a Russian military intelligence officer bragged to a colleague that his organization, known as the GRU, was getting ready to pay Clinton back for what President Vladimir Putin believed was an influence operation she had run against him five years earlier as Secretary of State. The GRU, he said, was going to cause chaos in the upcoming U.S. election.

What the officer didn't know, senior intelligence officials tell TIME, was that U.S. spies were listening. They wrote up the conversation and sent it back to analysts at headquarters, who turned it from raw intelligence into an official report and circulated it. But if the officer's boast seems like a red flag now, at the time U.S. officials didn't know what to make of it. "We didn't really understand the context of it until much later," says the senior intelligence official. Investigators now realize that the officer's boast was the first indication U.S. spies had from their sources that Russia wasn't just hacking email accounts to collect intelligence but was also considering interfering in the vote.

Like much of America, many in the U.S. government hadn't imagined the kind of influence operation that Russia was preparing to unleash on the 2016 election. Fewer still realized it had been five years in the making.

In 2011, protests in more than 70 cities across Russia had threatened Putin's control of the Kremlin. The uprising was organized on social media by a popular blogger named Alexei Navalny, who used his blog as well as Twitter and Facebook to get crowds in the streets. Putin's forces broke out their own social media technique to strike back. When bloggers tried to organize nationwide protests on Twitter using #Triumfalnaya, pro-Kremlin botnets bombarded the hashtag with anti-protester messages and nonsense tweets, making it impossible for Putin's opponents to coalesce.

Putin publicly accused then Secretary of State Clinton of running a massive influence operation against his country, saying she had sent "a signal" to protesters and that the State Department had actively worked to fuel the protests. The State Department said it had just funded pro-democracy organizations. Former officials say any such operations--in Russia or elsewhere--would require a special intelligence finding by the President and that Barack Obama was not likely to have issued one.

After his re-election the following year, Putin dispatched his newly installed head of military intelligence, Igor Sergun, to begin repurposing cyberweapons previously used for psychological operations in war zones for use in electioneering. Russian intelligence agencies funded "troll farms," botnet spamming operations and fake news outlets as part of an expanding focus on psychological operations in cyberspace.

It turns out Putin had outside help.
Posted by Navytiger74
Member since Oct 2009
50458 posts
Posted on 9/17/17 at 10:59 am to
quote:

How do you feel about the way Hillary and the DNC dealt with cybersecurity protections, threats, and the subsequent investigation?
I don't give a wooden nickel about what Hillary's campaign did to protect a bunch of unclassified campaign-related communications. They were inept. But the Clinton campaign's poor cyber-security is not the subject of this investigation. It neither excuses the actions of foreign actors who sought to interfere nor those of any potential colluders on our side.
Posted by Navytiger74
Member since Oct 2009
50458 posts
Posted on 9/17/17 at 10:59 am to
quote:

Lulz, I did more than CNN/NYT in 5 minutes


If you say so.
Posted by Bass Tiger
Member since Oct 2014
46151 posts
Posted on 9/17/17 at 11:02 am to
quote:

So NT, you're in or around the field. How do you feel about the way Hillary and the DNC dealt with cybersecurity protections, threats, and the subsequent investigation?


NT would like to answer your question but he's to busy trying to figure out how to get out of the corner he constantly paints himself in. Lol!
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
146950 posts
Posted on 9/17/17 at 11:03 am to
Russia paying HRC back for election interference had nothing to do with Trump. True or False?
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
146950 posts
Posted on 9/17/17 at 11:05 am to
he lost his tan already, here he is...

Posted by WaWaWeeWa
Member since Oct 2015
15714 posts
Posted on 9/17/17 at 11:14 am to
quote:

It neither excuses the actions of foreign actors who sought to interfere nor those of any potential colluders on our side.


Don't try to change the subject

This entire witch hunt started because the media said trump was colluding with Russians because Putin hacked the DNC to help Trump

Trump hasn't even announced he was running for president yet

You clown
Posted by LSUnation78
Northshore
Member since Aug 2012
12074 posts
Posted on 9/17/17 at 11:20 am to
I get what you are trying to say, but this doesn't mean its impossible there was communication ahead of Trump's official announcement.


I dont think there was any at all, personally. But logically the hack being in 2015 doesnt completely remove all scenarios where russia/trump communicated regarding the hack.

Posted by Navytiger74
Member since Oct 2009
50458 posts
Posted on 9/17/17 at 11:22 am to
quote:



Don't try to change the subject

This entire witch hunt started because the media said trump was colluding with Russians because Putin hacked the DNC to help Trump

Trump hasn't even announced he was running for president yet

You clown
Who changed the subject? We're talking about external actors and their motivations--not poor cybersecurity. And the investigation didn't start over accusations of collusion between Trump's people and the Russians and it didn't start in the media. Quite the opposite on both accounts. I don't have the time to can't catch every new idiot on this site up on the basics of the case just to be able to have a square conversation.
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
146950 posts
Posted on 9/17/17 at 11:25 am to
quote:

Who changed the subject? We're talking about external actors and their motivations--not poor cybersecurity. And the investigation didn't start over accusations of collusion between Trump's people and the Russians and it didn't start in the media. Quite the opposite on both accounts. I don't have the time to can't catch every new idiot on this site up on the basics of the case just to be able to have a square conversation.
You can't catch every new idiot up on the facts? Please post some facts first.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram