Started By
Message

re: Rover Pipeline spills more than 2 million gallons of drilling fluid one month in.

Posted on 4/20/17 at 10:50 am to
Posted by CelticDog
Member since Apr 2015
42867 posts
Posted on 4/20/17 at 10:50 am to
quote:

surely there can be a balance which does not disincentive companies to do business in the US while at the same time protecting our air and water?



take fracking as an example.

there is a lot of money to be made. companies can take more care and still make money.

pipeline issues like the OP story are known engineering issues.

and if you can't do fracking without pollution with today's technology, then we should wait uuntil it can be done without risk. and in the meanwhile, diversify the USA approach to energy generation.
wind ha ha
solar ha ha

solar is making great strides. Tesla stock price says hi


Posted by CorporateTiger
Member since Aug 2014
10700 posts
Posted on 4/20/17 at 10:52 am to
Has anyone answered if this is a cheapo surface pipe installed for temporary purposes?

I would guess so, because I can't imagine that a permanent buried pipeline makes sense to transport drilling fluid, which also isn't really particularly harmful.
Posted by LSUfanNkaty
LC, Louisiana
Member since Jan 2015
11117 posts
Posted on 4/20/17 at 10:53 am to
quote:

take fracking as an example


Yes, please provide an example.
Posted by CorporateTiger
Member since Aug 2014
10700 posts
Posted on 4/20/17 at 10:54 am to
quote:

there is a lot of money to be made. companies can take more care and still make money.



Show me any major environmental issue caused by fracking. I will wait for a while because there hasn't been one.

quote:

and if you can't do fracking without pollution with today's technology, then we should wait uuntil it can be done without risk. and in the meanwhile, diversify the USA approach to energy generation.


There is literally no industrial activity known to man that is "without pollution" or "without risk."

fricking burning dung in grass huts like our ancestors did 8k years ago causes pollution.
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
48663 posts
Posted on 4/20/17 at 10:55 am to
Oh Otto. You are so silly
Posted by LSUfanNkaty
LC, Louisiana
Member since Jan 2015
11117 posts
Posted on 4/20/17 at 10:55 am to
quote:

Show me any major environmental issue caused by fracking. I will wait for a while because there hasn't been one.



Posted by The Maj
Member since Sep 2016
27196 posts
Posted on 4/20/17 at 10:57 am to
quote:

then we should wait uuntil it can be done without risk


I know this is going to be difficult for you to grasp but NOTHING can be accomplished without some form of risk...

Posted by MrLarson
Member since Oct 2014
34984 posts
Posted on 4/20/17 at 10:58 am to
quote:

take fracking as an example.



Move those goal posts you liberal bitch.

Oldbitch won't even come back to his thread but here you are sucking environmental dick.
This post was edited on 4/20/17 at 10:59 am
Posted by texag7
College Station
Member since Apr 2014
37573 posts
Posted on 4/20/17 at 10:58 am to
Damn son. You got rekt ITT
Posted by CorporateTiger
Member since Aug 2014
10700 posts
Posted on 4/20/17 at 10:59 am to
Also the idea that these companies are making lots of money is crazy, there have been so many bankruptcies in the industry lately. I think we are through the worst of it, but that remains to be seen.

Extraction costs are just now balancing out with oil prices.
Posted by The Mick
Member since Oct 2010
43222 posts
Posted on 4/20/17 at 11:02 am to
For perspective, 2 mill gallons is about 400 tanker trucks. (not commenting on the issue really, just throwing this in there)
Posted by olddawg26
Member since Jan 2013
24633 posts
Posted on 4/20/17 at 11:03 am to
Not really I'm not gonna keep explaining myself though. I knew it was a muddy substance from comments on Reddit and the article, and I knew it was harmless to a certain degree. The sheer numbers of exaggerations and buzz words just poured in and diluted what could have been an actual conversation.
Posted by olddawg26
Member since Jan 2013
24633 posts
Posted on 4/20/17 at 11:04 am to
quote:

Oldbitch


Ah yes let me see what rational discourse you and I might have.
Posted by MrLarson
Member since Oct 2014
34984 posts
Posted on 4/20/17 at 11:17 am to
quote:

Ah yes let me see what rational discourse you and I might have.




Was your OP rational.

Did you even do any research before you went full retard about the environment?
Posted by olddawg26
Member since Jan 2013
24633 posts
Posted on 4/20/17 at 11:19 am to
I'd say it's way more rational than name calling.
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
48663 posts
Posted on 4/20/17 at 11:20 am to
You are so sensitive. Calm down, Francis.
Posted by Nado Jenkins83
Land of the Free
Member since Nov 2012
59753 posts
Posted on 4/20/17 at 11:22 am to
quote:

CelticDog


tell me ohh wise one...who is putting most of the money up for green energy R&D?










thats right....oil companies
you are ignorant on this
Posted by MrLarson
Member since Oct 2014
34984 posts
Posted on 4/20/17 at 11:24 am to
quote:

I'd say it's way more rational than name calling.


Show me your research and I'll take back calling you a fricking retard.

Hell, I'll start a thread bowing at your feet.
Posted by CelticDog
Member since Apr 2015
42867 posts
Posted on 4/20/17 at 11:26 am to
quote:

who is putting most of the money up for green energy R&D?



this link just says who is spending the most for infrastructure.
note spending fell in part because the cost of photovoltaics is dropping.

care to share your knowledge of USA investors?
My sister has made OT money on her investment in Tesla.
One of our kids has made a decent return on her investment in smaller energy startups.
One of our kids works for a company with tentacles in the energy biz.



LINK

1. China

2. Japan

3. USA

4. England

5. Germany
This post was edited on 4/20/17 at 11:30 am
Posted by olddawg26
Member since Jan 2013
24633 posts
Posted on 4/20/17 at 11:27 am to
quote:

I'll take back calling you a fricking retard.


I don't really give a shite. I knew it would get blasted. Anytime someone makes a thread that isn't really right leaning it's about 50:1 against you. Pretty soon the exaggerations and memes start pouring in and everything goes off the rails. Takes way more balls to make a thread that's against the grain than it takes for someone to call someone a retard on a message board.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram