- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Reuters: Trump campaign had at least 18 undisclosed contacts with Russians
Posted on 5/18/17 at 8:10 am to AUstar
Posted on 5/18/17 at 8:10 am to AUstar
quote:
The question is why? What is the deep state so opposed to improved US/Russia relations? What are they afraid of? Why do they seemingly want a new Cold War?
Jobs. They need an enemy that they can "spy" on. If we dont have to put resources to Russia thats a significant amount of decreased funding.
0
Posted on 5/18/17 at 8:13 am to AUstar
There it is. They are already trying to undermine the SC.
Posted on 5/18/17 at 8:13 am to AUstar
Kremlin - how many?
Associates of the Kremlin?
How many of those were Flynn?
How many calls to people with Russian ties did Hillary's people have in the last six months of 2016? Just for a baseline.
Associates of the Kremlin?
How many of those were Flynn?
How many calls to people with Russian ties did Hillary's people have in the last six months of 2016? Just for a baseline.
Posted on 5/18/17 at 8:15 am to AUstar
So why is this just now coming out if it is so incriminating? Reason - agenda. Concealing more fuel for more smoke.
Posted on 5/18/17 at 8:15 am to AUstar
quote:
The question is why? What is the deep state so opposed to improved US/Russia relations? What are they afraid of? Why do they seemingly want a new Cold War?
I would love to hear answers to these questions.
Maybe the wrong battle is D vs. R. It should be the people vs. "deep state". The deep state just uses either the D or R as a proxy of convenience to forward their agenda. They are loyal to their agenda (whatever that is...probably MIC spending) not necessarily loyal to party or country.
Posted on 5/18/17 at 8:16 am to AUstar
If the contacts were illegal, the dems would have used it to sink Trump before the election. This is nothing butt fodder for morons.
Posted on 5/18/17 at 8:17 am to Jake88
quote:
The people who described the contacts to Reuters said they had seen no evidence of wrongdoing or collusion between the campaign and Russia in the communications reviewed so far
That's burying the lede.
Posted on 5/18/17 at 8:18 am to AUstar
Trumpkins will say Reuters is lying. "They're all out to get Trump."
Posted on 5/18/17 at 8:18 am to airfernando
quote:
butt fodder
Posted on 5/18/17 at 8:18 am to the808bass
quote:
hat's burying the lede.
Not when you deny talking to them in the first place
Posted on 5/18/17 at 8:19 am to AUstar
WGAF? How many did Obama have? How many did Trump have wish Israel for example?
Posted on 5/18/17 at 8:20 am to a want
No. It's not. It's only important that they're undisclosed contacts if there's collusion. Otherwise it's still a nothingburger.
This post was edited on 5/18/17 at 8:21 am
Posted on 5/18/17 at 8:21 am to RollTide1987
This info will guide mueller.
Posted on 5/18/17 at 8:23 am to Haughton99
quote:
You don't think there's a little difference in our relationship with Britain vs. Russia?
How is it different?
Posted on 5/18/17 at 8:24 am to AUstar
You left out the part where Reuters said no laws were broken and this is a nothingburger
Posted on 5/18/17 at 8:24 am to CelticDog
quote:
This info will guide mueller.
Posted on 5/18/17 at 8:25 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
So the ENTIRE Trump campaign PLACED OR RECEIVED an average of 2.5 calls or emails PER MONTH on ANY SUBJECT with ANYONE affiliated directly or indirectly with the Russians.
That is some damn efficient collusion.
I'd seriously feel more confident in the Trump Admin if they did collude that efficiently. That's a level of competence I can trust.
Posted on 5/18/17 at 8:26 am to AUstar
quote:
Reuters: Trump campaign had at least 18 undisclosed contacts with Russians by AUstar
Well, Trump would be an irresponsible (future) POTUS if he did not start developing relationships with a big player in World Politics like Russia. Duh!
"undisclosed"....what, he's supposed to publish each conversation.
The whole 'Russian' thing was created to cover Obama's/Intel Community 'deep state operatives' "wiretapping" of the Trump Campaign. There is the real 'Watergate'. We'll see just how honest Mueller is; likely as honest as the "above reproach" Comey.
Posted on 5/18/17 at 8:32 am to AUstar
Here is another quote from that article:
quote:
The people who described the contacts to Reuters said they had seen no evidence of wrongdoing or collusion between the campaign and Russia in the communications reviewed so far.
Posted on 5/18/17 at 8:42 am to AUstar
quote:
2) Who is doing the leaking? Are they connected to Obama? Is it Obama himself?
The Priebus GOPe wing is doing the leaking. Its becoming obvious that they are openly working to force Trump from power so that Pence can be prez.
Page 3 of 5
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News