Started By
Message

re: Report: Autopsy analysis shows Michael Brown may have gone for Wilson’s gun

Posted on 10/22/14 at 10:25 am to
Posted by KCT
Psalm 23:5
Member since Feb 2010
38911 posts
Posted on 10/22/14 at 10:25 am to
Ace, I appreciate your suggestion

That poster follows me around the board, often picks out one or two words I've said which mean nothing by themselves, and attacks me rather than discuss the merits of what I've actually said.

I have 2-3 people who do that, and it gets old. I defy anybody to read VB's "contribution" to this thread and say he's done anything but stalk me.
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
51489 posts
Posted on 10/22/14 at 10:27 am to
I'm already seeing cries of conspiracy from some of the more rabid folks on my FB feed. I've mentioned that not only has there not been a single piece of evidence yet to support the stance that Brown had his hands up but that every single thing found thus far (autopsy, forensics on the vehicle and scene) point toward the exact opposite of the original story that ginned up all this outrage (Wilson assassinated Brown by shooting him in the back).

There are people that are so bought-in to a philosophy (for whatever reason) that they will refuse to believe anything different no matter the evidence put before them (see: people that still believe the moon landings were staged out in the desert).
Posted by StrongSafety
Member since Sep 2004
17547 posts
Posted on 10/22/14 at 10:27 am to
From what I have read, the store owners never called the cops on MB.

So the robbery may not be pertinent here. Who knows what Lead to brown being dead. Who are we to say that cop didn't aggressively attack brown first?

I find it hard to give policemen the benefit of the doubt with all these recent strings of power abuse and hyper aggressiveness.
Posted by ChineseBandit58
Pearland, TX
Member since Aug 2005
42532 posts
Posted on 10/22/14 at 10:27 am to
quote:

There is such a person. I'd change my opinion of him 180 degrees if he'd speak up, but I'm afraid he will not.


This was my first thought when he was elected - and was the only consolation I had at his becoming POTUS. He has failed magnificently so far, but this would be the perfect time for him to step up to the plate and squash Jackson/Sharpton like roaches and to send Holder out with direct orders to set this thing into proper perspective.

Of course he will remain silent, or even lend sympathy to the liars and rioters.

He could still cement a decent legacy if he chose to do so - if he dedicated the rest of his tenure to quelling the race baiting nonsense that has torn the country apart for the last several decades he could secure a very positive note to an otherwise deplorable record.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89485 posts
Posted on 10/22/14 at 10:28 am to
quote:

That poster follows me around the board, often picks out one or two words I've said which mean nothing by themselves, and attacks me rather than discuss the merits of what I've actually said.


But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also. - Matthew 5:39

And unto him that smiteth thee on the one cheek offer also the other; and him that taketh away thy cloke forbid not to take thy coat also. Luke 6:29

But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you; Matthew 5:44

I fall far short of this as well.



Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111499 posts
Posted on 10/22/14 at 10:29 am to
quote:

He went two months ago. And the violence and protests stopped and he was thanked.

The only part that is correct is the "he was thanked" part.
Eta: and the "two months"
This post was edited on 10/22/14 at 10:30 am
Posted by StrongSafety
Member since Sep 2004
17547 posts
Posted on 10/22/14 at 10:30 am to
This evidence is all "sources"

Mainly, it's PDs leaking info to turn the tide. They did it when they released the store videos, against DOJ wishes, and when they held those press conferences and skewed case facts.

I'm not saying they aren't right, but how can this not be questioned as spin control? What is so reputable about this county's investigation office that leads you guys to take their word as gold?
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111499 posts
Posted on 10/22/14 at 10:30 am to
quote:

From what I have read, the store owners never called the cops on MB. So the robbery may not be pertinent here. Who knows what Lead to brown being dead. Who are we to say that cop didn't aggressively attack brown first? I find it hard to give policemen the benefit of the doubt with all these recent strings of power abuse and hyper aggressiveness.

A customer in the store called 911. The call went out to officers before the altercation.
Posted by Vegas Bengal
Member since Feb 2008
26344 posts
Posted on 10/22/14 at 10:31 am to
quote:

The truth is, Obama has gone out of his way to make a big deal out of situations ONLY when a white person was WRONGLY perceived to have done something wrong. Cambridge police matter, Trayvon Martin case, and Ferguson, MO.


It was a "big deal" before Obama said anything. The protests started the day after the shooting and that turned into riots can continued. Five days later Obama spoke:

quote:

President Obama, speaking to reporters at a hastily arranged news conference on Martha’s Vineyard, where he is vacationing, denounced attacks both on the police and on protesters, and pleaded for “peace and calm on the streets of Ferguson.” He said he had spoken to Mr. Nixon and confirmed that he had instructed the Justice Department and the F.B.I. to investigate the fatal shooting, “to help determine exactly what happened and to see that justice is done.

Mr. Obama said that local officials had “a responsibility to be open and transparent about how they are investigating that death.” And he said the Justice Department was consulting with the local officials about appropriate responses to the protests.

“There is never an excuse for violence against police or for those who would use this tragedy as a cover for vandalism or looting,” he said. “There’s also no excuse for police to use excessive force against peaceful protests or to throw protesters in jail for lawfully exercising their First Amendment rights.”

Mr. Obama also criticized the detentions by local police of two reporters on Wednesday who were recharging their phones and working on their articles at a local McDonald’s, saying, “Here in the United States of America, police should not be bullying or arresting journalists who are just trying to do their jobs and report to the American people on what they see on the ground.”
LINK

What he said, any president would say. In fact, after the police in the Rodney King case were acquitted, and the LA riots began, Bush on national television acknowledged that the verdict was "unjust" and his DOJ prosecuted the cops. If Bush were black, you'd have a hissy fit.

quote:

Obama is even from Chicago, more or less, and he has almost never even acknowledged the black on black murder rate in that city.

Same ting with Holder. He went to Ferguson and announced, "I'm here as a black man," and talked about how he had been pulled over in New Jersey. Of course Holder played the race card in Ferguson.

It must really suck for you that the facts in the Ferguson, MO case are all trending in favor of the police officer. That's why you haven't offered one comment relative to the subject of this thread. All you've done is pick out one or two words of mine and taken the meaning totally out of context.


You're comparing apples to oranges. There was chaos in Missouri. Again, he did what presidents do.

As for your fixation on unrelated crimes and chicago, since Obama has been in office, the crime rate has fallen just over 10% and we have 10% less incarcerated. As for chicago,
quote:

CHICAGO (AP) — Following a year when Chicago led the nation in homicides with more than 500, the city's Police Department said Wednesday that in 2013 the city recorded the fewest killings since 1965 and saw its overall crime rate fall to level not seen since 1972.

The city, which ended the year with a 16 percent drop in crime, saw the numbers of violent crimes, including robbery, aggravated battery and criminal sexual assault drop significantly — some by double digits— as well as drops in burglary and motor vehicle theft.


and this year it's down 14% from last year. Stop watching Fox News.

quote:

You know what, dude? I've met very few gay people who weren't mad at the world because they were different, and you certainly fit that mold


I'm not on this board calling every black person from Holder to Obama to Oprah racist each and every day.
quote:

Regardless of what the facts are, you go against the grain of what is right, just, and even obvious in order not to align yourself with mainstream America. I see this with gay people all the time.




You're cartoonish.
quote:

It's not our fault you are gay, fool.


Who is "our" as in "our fault"? And whose fault is it? Because I would love to thank him. If it wouldn't be for him, I might be like you.

Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111499 posts
Posted on 10/22/14 at 10:31 am to
quote:

This evidence is all "sources" Mainly, it's PDs leaking info to turn the tide.

These are federal leaks. And in some stories, they are noted as such.
Posted by dnm3305
Member since Feb 2009
13560 posts
Posted on 10/22/14 at 10:31 am to
quote:

Report: Autopsy analysis shows Michael Brown may have gone for Wilson’s gun


Wait...so youre saying a police officer wasnt just riding around shooting black people in the back? Then why in the hell are all of those people still protesting and stealing shite?
Posted by FT
REDACTED
Member since Oct 2003
26925 posts
Posted on 10/22/14 at 10:31 am to
quote:

I have 2-3 people who do that
You talkin bout me, baw?
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111499 posts
Posted on 10/22/14 at 10:33 am to
It's interesting that you choose KCT as your target.
Posted by StrongSafety
Member since Sep 2004
17547 posts
Posted on 10/22/14 at 10:33 am to
But when the store owners were asked about it, they didn't report a problem.

It's clearly spin control. They show the video of MB robbing the guy as opposed to the video of him purchasing the cigars.

Which one do you think will fit police departments narrative?
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89485 posts
Posted on 10/22/14 at 10:34 am to
quote:

From what I have read, the store owners never called the cops on MB.


That's what is believed at this time - that neither the store owner nor an employee called 911.

A customer did. What's your point?

quote:

So the robbery may not be pertinent here.


Lol wut? He clearly robbed that store. He wasn't taking advantage of some, "Hey, if you're big and strong enough to take shite from us - go right ahead" promotion.

quote:

Who are we to say that cop didn't aggressively attack brown first?


Because the evidence doesn't support that. You ever fought with someone from a car seat? It don't work if they're outside the car.

quote:

I find it hard to give policemen the benefit of the doubt with all these recent strings of power abuse and hyper aggressiveness.


AH - now we're getting into it - I'm really watchful of cops lately, too. No question that many think they're above the law, abuse their authority, overreach, abuse suspects in custody, etc.

However, we're not giving him the benefit of the doubt here - in fact, I did the opposite - I was in the "You got some splainin' to do" from the very beginning.

But - now we have to evaluate the evidence as it comes it. And, thus far, the objective evidence has been nearly 100% in the officer's favor.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111499 posts
Posted on 10/22/14 at 10:35 am to
quote:

But when the store owners were asked about it, they didn't report a problem. It's clearly spin control. They show the video of MB robbing the guy as opposed to the video of him purchasing the cigars. Which one do you think will fit police departments narrative?

I'm not a defender of the police. But the facts that you're questioning have been addressed.
Posted by StrongSafety
Member since Sep 2004
17547 posts
Posted on 10/22/14 at 10:35 am to
They are intimidated by black people in power that have pride in themselves and won't fall for the guise of a colorblind America
Posted by Vols&Shaft83
Throbbing Member
Member since Dec 2012
69896 posts
Posted on 10/22/14 at 10:35 am to
quote:

I'm not saying they aren't right, but how can this not be questioned as spin control? What is so reputable about this county's investigation office that leads you guys to take their word as gold?




Wilson was already convicted in the court of public opinion before any of the facts came out.


Riots took place before the facts came out.

Threats of violence were made at the officer before the facts came out.




SPIN CONTROL? ARE YOU frickING KIDDING ME?



Posted by baybeefeetz
Member since Sep 2009
31633 posts
Posted on 10/22/14 at 10:36 am to
quote:

quote: I find it hard to give policemen the benefit of the doubt with all these recent strings of power abuse and hyper aggressiveness.


To me this is not very different from "I read a lot of stories about violent not crimes by blacks, so i tend to believe brown attacked the cop."
This post was edited on 10/22/14 at 10:37 am
Posted by ChineseBandit58
Pearland, TX
Member since Aug 2005
42532 posts
Posted on 10/22/14 at 10:36 am to
quote:

Who are we to say that cop didn't aggressively attack brown first?

I find it hard to give policemen the benefit of the doubt with all these recent strings of power abuse and hyper aggressiveness.

UN f'n believable.

So out of hundreds of thousands of police/civilian interaction that occur every day, there are a handful of 'cops shoot dog' events - and from that you conclude that all cops must be power abusers and hyper aggressive.

With that kind of logic, you must cower behind your mother's apron anytime a black man comes into view, given the plethora of black-on-black murders that occur.

I - being a sane observer - can say there is no evidence of this cop aggressively attacking first, other than the demonstrable lies of the Brown's co-henchman.

Do YOU have even a smidgen of fact to support your hesitancy to believe the forensic evidence known so far?
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram