Started By
Message

re: Renewable energy becoming so cheap US will meet Paris commitments even if Trump withdraws

Posted on 7/17/17 at 9:30 am to
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
423563 posts
Posted on 7/17/17 at 9:30 am to
quote:

Somehow you're going to twist this into victory for Trump?

well it is a victory in light of the melt that occurred when he withdrew from the Paris agreement

this shows we don't need to be part of that agreement to meet its standards, so why bind ourselves to the financial obligations?
Posted by el Gaucho
He/They
Member since Dec 2010
53124 posts
Posted on 7/17/17 at 9:41 am to
"Renewable" energy is the biggest lie out there

Either killing bald eagles with wind mills or making ecological nightmares with nasty lithium mining and disposal

We already have a clean safe unlimited source of energy, it's called fossil fuels

Make America roll coal again baw
Posted by Knight of Old
New Hampshire
Member since Jul 2007
11038 posts
Posted on 7/17/17 at 9:45 am to
quote:

the developing/developed schism
I've come to believe that the whole environmental/agw movement is just a tactic in the broader strategy of the Far Left to manufacture their vision of 'one-world-equality'; transferring the wealth of the USA through the Paris Accord is one element of that tactic.

A tell tale fact in the whole bunch of nonsense is that not everyone is treated equally in this initiative -i.e., major global actors such as China or India are effectively exempt. Which exposes the foundation that the Far Left relies upon to support their 'one-world' thesis/ideal: the USA is at fault for many/most of the world's ills and therefore must pay retribution...
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
74314 posts
Posted on 7/17/17 at 9:46 am to
But Hollywood said pullimg out was going to destroy the world
Posted by Breesus
House of the Rising Sun
Member since Jan 2010
66982 posts
Posted on 7/17/17 at 9:47 am to
W I N N I N G
I
N
N
I
N
G
Posted by dewster
Chicago
Member since Aug 2006
25399 posts
Posted on 7/17/17 at 9:50 am to
quote:

Renewable energy becoming so cheap US will meet Paris commitments even if Trump withdraws


Trump just can't stop winning.
Posted by SirWinston
PNW
Member since Jul 2014
82274 posts
Posted on 7/17/17 at 9:50 am to
The fact that you are too stupid to grasp that this makes Trumps decision a no-brainer is very sad.
Posted by Loserman
Member since Sep 2007
21967 posts
Posted on 7/17/17 at 9:51 am to
Renewable energy will not be cheaper in your lifetime without government(taxpayer) subsidies.

The US gets only around 12% of it's energy from renewable sources today and those sources all cost more than fossil fuels.

Furthermore, it will take between 12 and 20 millions of acres of land to support solar and wind and the rich libs don't want wind or solar plants in their back yards.

Plus the Enviro wackos will never let anyone completely cover all of the US deserts because that might wipe out a beetle.
This post was edited on 7/17/17 at 4:50 pm
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
124195 posts
Posted on 7/17/17 at 9:51 am to
quote:

Renewable energy becoming so cheap US will meet Paris commitments even if Trump withdraws
Good.
Everyone's a winner then.

No worries. But remind me again.
What was the calculated difference the effort was expected to make?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
423563 posts
Posted on 7/17/17 at 9:52 am to
quote:

I've come to believe that the whole environmental/agw movement is just a tactic in the broader strategy of the Far Left to manufacture their vision of 'one-world-equality'; transferring the wealth of the USA through the Paris Accord is one element of that tactic.

as with many liberal-progressive movements, there is a large degree of hidden Marxism involved under the surface

just ask yourself this: how many primarily progressive movements don't include some sort of property transfer?

the closest i can think of off the top of my head is criminal justice reform, but that's a libertarian position much more than a progressive one. they kind of absorbed a few aspects of it to suck it into the umbrella
Posted by member12
Bob's Country Bunker
Member since May 2008
32123 posts
Posted on 7/17/17 at 9:53 am to
So why did all the progressive totalitarians lose their shite about this?
Posted by Loserman
Member since Sep 2007
21967 posts
Posted on 7/17/17 at 9:56 am to
quote:

just ask yourself this: how many primarily progressive movements don't include some sort of property transfer?


All progressive movements whether they be...

Animal rights
Feminism
Enviromentalism
etc
All have the same goal, Socialism anti-capitalism and the elimination of private property rights
Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 7/17/17 at 9:58 am to
quote:

Renewable energy will not be cheaper in your lifetime without government(taxpayer) subsidies.

The US only around 12% of it's energy from renewable sources today and those sources all cost more than fossil fuels.

Furthermore, it will take between 12 and 20 millions of acres of land to support solar and wind and the rich libs don't want wind or solar plants in their back yards.

Plus the Enviro wackos will never let anyone completely cover all of the US deserts because that might wipe out a beetle.





That^
Posted by FooManChoo
Member since Dec 2012
41790 posts
Posted on 7/17/17 at 10:01 am to
Should be obvious with anyone with a brain that the PCA was nothing more than a global welfare program to give third-world countries money to continue to pollute.
Posted by Vols&Shaft83
Throbbing Member
Member since Dec 2012
69944 posts
Posted on 7/17/17 at 10:01 am to
Then what are you crying about you insufferable dick smoker?



Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 7/17/17 at 10:03 am to
quote:

All have the same goal, Socialism anti-capitalism and the elimination of private property rights


Founder of ACLU:

"I am for socialism, disarmament, and, ultimately, for abolishing the state itself... I seek the social ownership of property, the abolition of the propertied class, and the sole control of those who produce wealth. Communism is the goal."

Roger Nash Baldwin
Posted by Turbeauxdog
Member since Aug 2004
23279 posts
Posted on 7/17/17 at 10:24 am to
So we get the benefit without transferring billions to other countries?

Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
140748 posts
Posted on 7/17/17 at 10:26 am to
Pole smoker. It's pole smoker.
Posted by Gaspergou202
Metairie, LA
Member since Jun 2016
13504 posts
Posted on 7/17/17 at 10:26 am to
I couldn't care less about the SOURCE of my energy. I only care about its affordability and in certain applications its portability.

Affordable is actual cost! Subsidies do not lower costs, it just transfers payment from consumers to taxpayers! If wind turbines create cheaper electricity than natural gas, great. Chop a few birds up for me!

If my car can run cheaper on fermented ground hog droppings than gasoline, then I'll run my car on rodent doodoo!

My main issues with solar are:
1- False cheapness from government welfare. Subsidies aren't free!
2- Real pollution, (not CO2 that puppies and babies exhale with every breath) the stuff that will kill you dead, that is produced in China to make "cheap" solar cells!
3- Dependability. Only 50% of time in any location has daylight on average in the year. And only a few hours of sunshine at good angles. What about night? Burn back up fossil fuels, or use expensive and extremely polluting (the kill you dead kind-not the CO2 bisons exhale) batteries? What about storm damage like wind, hail, and lightning. What about clouds, overcast, and fog. Snow and ice suck. Dust and grim naturally impair output. These not only determine dependability but also costs! Bird shite and leaves can be a hassle as well. I have to wash bird shite off my car weekly; would really hate to pull the old ladder out and go on the roof with old rags and windex.
4- Return on investment. How long will it take to turn a profit (subsidize interest rates are just personal or corporate welfare)? What are the maintenance costs? What are the repair cost of normal storm breakage? What is the useful lifespan before replacement cost are generated!

Now as far as the Paris Accord, this was just a Obama money transfer boondoggle like Solyndra! Fortunately, Trump prevented our hard earned money from being transferred in some kind of international welfare plan!

WINNING
This post was edited on 7/17/17 at 10:32 am
Posted by deltaland
Member since Mar 2011
90891 posts
Posted on 7/17/17 at 10:27 am to
So the free market will ensure that we meet or exceed environmental standards over the rest of the world while not having to pay taxpayer money to other countries in the Paris agreement.l?

Sounds great. Still not tired of winning
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram