Started By
Message
locked post

Renewable energy becoming so cheap US will meet Paris commitments even if Trump withdraws

Posted on 7/17/17 at 9:19 am
Posted by Bison
Truth or Consequences
Member since Dec 2016
1237 posts
Posted on 7/17/17 at 9:19 am
Morgan Stanley Research Analysis

quote:

“By our forecasts, in most cases favorable renewables economics rather than government policy will be the primary driver of changes to utilities’ carbon emissions levels,” they wrote. “For example, notwithstanding president Trump’s stated intention to withdraw the US from the Paris climate accord, we expect the US to exceed the Paris commitment of a 26-28% reduction in its 2005-level carbon emissions by 2020.”


quote:

Globally, the price of solar panels has fallen 50% between 2016 and 2017, they write. And in countries with favorable wind conditions, the costs associated with wind power “can be as low as one-half to one-third that of coal- or natural gas-fired power plants.” Innovations in wind-turbine design are allowing for ever-longer wind blades; that boost in efficiency will also increase power output from the wind sector, according to Morgan Stanley.




Sorry to keep posting about renewable energy, this will be my last post about renewable energy for the time being
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422777 posts
Posted on 7/17/17 at 9:22 am to
quote:

Renewable energy becoming so cheap US will meet Paris commitments even if Trump withdraws

even further proof that the melt was literally insanity
Posted by CptBengal
BR Baby
Member since Dec 2007
71661 posts
Posted on 7/17/17 at 9:22 am to
So the Paris accord was pointless.

Trump wins again
Posted by Knight of Old
New Hampshire
Member since Jul 2007
10985 posts
Posted on 7/17/17 at 9:22 am to
But the necessity of muh 'non-binding' Paris accord...
Posted by KingSlayer
Member since May 2015
2854 posts
Posted on 7/17/17 at 9:23 am to
quote:

Sorry to keep posting about renewable energy, this will be my last post


Wish you had stopped there.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422777 posts
Posted on 7/17/17 at 9:24 am to
i think it's becoming more and more clear that the reason why Europe was so upset with the US pulling out was that we'd stop helping to pay the subsidies to the developing countries, which will lead them to violate the agreement. the real issue was the myth that the developing world was adopting these standards out of the goodness of their hearts, when it was really to get a subsidy from the developed world (and this whole system relies on those transfers)
Posted by The Pirate King
Pangu
Member since May 2014
57711 posts
Posted on 7/17/17 at 9:24 am to
quote:

Renewable energy is simply becoming the cheapest option, fast.


I have a really hard time believing this includes the exorbitant cost of buying, repairing, and replacing solar panels and wind turbines. Especially on a level where they would be producing for cities of millions.
Posted by Colonel Flagg
Baton Rouge
Member since Apr 2010
22806 posts
Posted on 7/17/17 at 9:24 am to
Totally cool if the market truly supports it.

I don't know why anyone would want to gaze over windmills though unless they are getting paid.
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
67992 posts
Posted on 7/17/17 at 9:25 am to
If renewables win out in the open markets then that is the way it should be.

It's government picking winners and losers that I have a problem with.
Posted by stelly1025
Lafayette
Member since May 2012
8518 posts
Posted on 7/17/17 at 9:25 am to
So if the free market is allowing renewable energy to become so cheap than why did we need to put billions in the Paris Climate Accord? I think you are too stupid to see you just agreed with President Trump.
This post was edited on 7/17/17 at 9:25 am
Posted by Knight of Old
New Hampshire
Member since Jul 2007
10985 posts
Posted on 7/17/17 at 9:26 am to
quote:

when it was really to get a subsidy from the developed world
Follow the money...
Posted by olddawg26
Member since Jan 2013
24608 posts
Posted on 7/17/17 at 9:26 am to
quote:

If


When.

It's not up for debate.
Posted by Gusoline
Jacksonville, NC
Member since Dec 2013
7639 posts
Posted on 7/17/17 at 9:26 am to
dont worry bout it. i wouldnt have heard about it if not for you. Just a little more ammo to battle and counter liberals with.
Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 7/17/17 at 9:26 am to
You're delusional.
Posted by dantes69
Boise, Id.
Member since Aug 2011
2022 posts
Posted on 7/17/17 at 9:27 am to
The Paris climate accord was nothing more than a giant money transfer away from the USA, good for Trump.
Posted by tedmarkuson
texas
Member since Feb 2015
2592 posts
Posted on 7/17/17 at 9:28 am to
in other news......

Morgan Stanley: Trump market rally may be over…

Investors have greeted Donald Trump’s surprise win with the biggest stock market rally for any new U.S. president. Morgan Stanley is cautioning, however, that his coming inauguration may mark an end to these post-election good times.

The S&P 500 Index jumped 1 percent on Tuesday, pushing its gain since Nov. 8 toward 6 percent, on speculation Trump and policies pushed by the Republican-controlled Congress will boost growth. That’s all well and good, but near-record levels for U.S. stocks already reflect that sentiment, and the start of the Trump administration on Jan. 20 presents as good a time as any to scale back on equity holdings, the bank said.

predictions are like arseholes, everybody has them

since that prediction the dow has added 1500 additional points.
Posted by Bison
Truth or Consequences
Member since Dec 2016
1237 posts
Posted on 7/17/17 at 9:28 am to
quote:

Trump wins again


Really? Somehow you're going to twist this into victory for Trump? it's a victory DESPITE his best effort to derail an industry he and his friends could't profit from.

Part of what you say is correct in that trump will probably take credit for this.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422777 posts
Posted on 7/17/17 at 9:29 am to
quote:

Follow the money...

the developing/developed schism is a crucial issue with adapting to climate change

the developed world can afford to pay a premium (both in technology and energy/consumeables) to enact these changes

if these changes are mandated across the globe, we're literally sealing the fate of the developed world. they cannot afford the investment or higher prices and would face serious economic, health, and political conflict. that's why these agreements pretty much always include wealth transfer (and why we pulled out). the progs lying about these agreements being part of Paris was just terrible at the time of the melt
Posted by CoachChappy
Member since May 2013
32558 posts
Posted on 7/17/17 at 9:29 am to
The Paris accord was all about money. I'm glad we pulled out of it. This article seems to show that the market will take care of itself as usual.

Personally, I have solar panels already, but only due to the HUGE subsidies from fed and state. Without them, it wouldn't have been worth it. Renewable energy is the future, it's just not the present.
Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 7/17/17 at 9:29 am to
quote:


It's not up for debate.


"The debate is over"..."the science is settled".."There is a consensus"... You're part of a cult.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram