Started By
Message
locked post

Postal Service Losing Money. Again.

Posted on 5/11/17 at 8:28 am
Posted by Aubie Spr96
lolwut?
Member since Dec 2009
41137 posts
Posted on 5/11/17 at 8:28 am
LINK

quote:

The postal service on Wednesday reported a quarterly loss of $562 million, despite growth in package delivery, due to continued erosion in the use of first-class mail as well as expensive mandates for its retiree health-care obligations.



Why does anyone think single payer is a good idea? Is there a single entity that the gov't controls that is run well? Seriously. I can't think of a single one. Yet we have almost half the country determined to put them in control of the single most important aspect of their lives. Baffling.

Posted by GFaceKillah
Welcome to the Third World
Member since Nov 2005
5935 posts
Posted on 5/11/17 at 8:33 am to
Thanks, trump
Posted by Homesick Tiger
Greenbrier, AR
Member since Nov 2006
54210 posts
Posted on 5/11/17 at 8:37 am to
quote:

Thanks, trump


I love these type dumbass excuses. From the article:

quote:

The postal service has lost money for 10 years in a row.


Low info voter much?
Posted by PaperTiger
Ruston, LA
Member since Feb 2015
22942 posts
Posted on 5/11/17 at 8:38 am to
To be fair, name one company that could run the postal service and have it in the black at the end of the fiscal year.

The postal service just needs to be shut down
Posted by Mr.Perfect
Louisiana
Member since Mar 2013
17438 posts
Posted on 5/11/17 at 8:39 am to
Congress forcing them to meet some insane future pension liabilities in a short amount of time does need to be taken into consideration here.

Posted by BamaAtl
South of North
Member since Dec 2009
21897 posts
Posted on 5/11/17 at 8:43 am to
quote:

The postal service just needs to be shut down


Then millions of rural Republicans would have no access to mail - who the hell with a concern for profit motive is going to take on delivering mail to counties in Texas with 80 people total? What a joke.

The USPS is hampered by a Congressional mandate that it pre-fund 75 years worth of retirement benefits. 75 years! Without that mandate, the Post Office would be making billions in profit. Good luck getting FedEx or UPS to agree to that.
This post was edited on 5/11/17 at 8:43 am
Posted by Eli Goldfinger
Member since Sep 2016
32785 posts
Posted on 5/11/17 at 8:43 am to
quote:

Congress forcing them to meet some insane future pension liabilities in a short amount of time does need to be taken into consideration here.


Plus...nobody is using first class mail anymore.
Posted by airfernando
Member since Oct 2015
15248 posts
Posted on 5/11/17 at 8:45 am to
quote:

Why does anyone think single payer is a good idea?
Even liberals know single payer is not a good idea. Single payer is a trojan horse strategy to topple capitalism. Liberals' #1 goal is to topple capitalism. The is not a theory; it is a fact. The purpose of Global warming fear-mongering is the same thing.
Posted by Chuker
St George, Louisiana
Member since Nov 2015
7544 posts
Posted on 5/11/17 at 8:46 am to
What, you want a company providing you services to make bigly profits?




I'll take the company that makes no profit. That's why I like Amazon so much.
Posted by cahoots
Member since Jan 2009
9134 posts
Posted on 5/11/17 at 8:47 am to
quote:

Why does anyone think single payer is a good idea? Is there a single entity that the gov't controls that is run well? Seriously. I can't think of a single one. Yet we have almost half the country determined to put them in control of the single most important aspect of their lives. Baffling.


Why do people on this forum constantly misunderstand what single payer means? The USPS is not analogous to a single payer system. Regardless of whether you support the USPS or single payer healthcare, can you at least learn the difference?
This post was edited on 5/11/17 at 8:48 am
Posted by therick711
South
Member since Jan 2008
25122 posts
Posted on 5/11/17 at 8:47 am to
quote:

To be fair, name one company that could run the postal service and have it in the black at the end of the fiscal year.

The postal service just needs to be shut down


All of the other parcel services that don't have the crazy future liabilities of paying people that won't work for the service.
Posted by Machine
Earth
Member since May 2011
6001 posts
Posted on 5/11/17 at 8:48 am to
"An independent agency, the postal service does not use taxpayer money for its operations."
Posted by SirWinston
PNW
Member since Jul 2014
81794 posts
Posted on 5/11/17 at 8:49 am to
HTF is the USPS losing money despite their Amazon volume? Insane.
Posted by Tiger Lake
On the Lake !
Member since Dec 2016
1254 posts
Posted on 5/11/17 at 8:49 am to
quote:

Postal Service Losing Money. Again. by Aubie Spr96


Walk in ANY Post Office....ANY ONE....ANY WHERE.....and you will have your answer as to why.
Posted by Aubie Spr96
lolwut?
Member since Dec 2009
41137 posts
Posted on 5/11/17 at 8:50 am to
Listen..... If the gov't can't make a monopoly work after 100+ years of practice, they are NEVER gonna make it work.


quote:

Then millions of rural Republicans would have no access to mail - who the hell with a concern for profit motive is going to take on delivering mail to counties in Texas with 80 people total? What a joke.


This is kinda like "Muh Roads!" argument that we Libertarians love so much. If rural America has a need for mail to be delivered at their houses, they will get it delivered with or WITHOUT the gov't involved.

Posted by BamaAtl
South of North
Member since Dec 2009
21897 posts
Posted on 5/11/17 at 8:50 am to
quote:

HTF is the USPS losing money despite their Amazon volume?


Congressionally-mandated retirement pre-funding (75 years).
Posted by therick711
South
Member since Jan 2008
25122 posts
Posted on 5/11/17 at 8:52 am to
How dare they make them not carry unfunded liabilities! If they were just allowed to not fund their plans, they'd be great. What about all those plan promises? No problem there?

Also, they still have a fundamentals problem. The retirement contributions and worker's comp account for about $500 million. They have revenues of $17 billion. If you got rid of pre-paying retirement benefits and comp, the USPS still would have posted a $1 billion loss.

Nice try. The USPS is still doing dumb things and their pricing is still stupid. Keep up the bullshite narrative, though.
This post was edited on 5/11/17 at 8:56 am
Posted by cahoots
Member since Jan 2009
9134 posts
Posted on 5/11/17 at 8:55 am to
If y'all want to get rid of the USPS and rely on UPS and FedEx for everything, that's fine. However, realize that the biggest beneficiaries of the post office are rural areas. It's simply not efficient to deliver letters to the middle of nowhere every day of the week (except Sunday) for 50 cents each.
This post was edited on 5/11/17 at 8:56 am
Posted by Homesick Tiger
Greenbrier, AR
Member since Nov 2006
54210 posts
Posted on 5/11/17 at 8:55 am to
quote:

"An independent agency, the postal service does not use taxpayer money for its operations."


But their retirement system does. How in the hell do you seperate the two then?
Posted by therick711
South
Member since Jan 2008
25122 posts
Posted on 5/11/17 at 8:57 am to
quote:

If y'all want to get rid of the USPS and rely on UPS and FedEx for everything, that's fine. However, realize that the biggest beneficiaries of the post office are rural areas. It's simply not efficient to deliver letters to the middle of nowhere every day of the week (except Sunday) for 50 cents each.



We know. Price it correctly or don't do it. That's all anyone's ever said. We just need to hasten email making physical mail go the way of the buggy whip and quit subsidizing junk mailers.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram