- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: POST-BIRTH ABORTIONS
Posted on 10/29/14 at 10:50 am to KeyserSoze999
Posted on 10/29/14 at 10:50 am to KeyserSoze999
Not shocked
0
Posted on 10/29/14 at 10:54 am to KeyserSoze999
Holy frick Pro-Lifers are easy to troll
Posted on 10/29/14 at 10:56 am to baytiger
quote:
Holy frick Pro-Lifers are easy to troll
you over estimate the intelligence of Pro Baby Murderers
Posted on 10/29/14 at 10:57 am to Hawkeye95
quote:If we have no standard whatsoever, then what? We're just animals eating each other. Somebody has to say it, and some people have to listen. Right now we have a standard, and I think it's pretty decent. Why is your standard better?
f you agree that its all subjective, then how can you say what is appropriate to do or not do based on say the bible?
quote:This is deplorable to me
this is a noble goal, of course the problem is that its the wrong sort of people breeding.
Posted on 10/29/14 at 10:59 am to bamarep
quote:This is a far better solution. Get rid of the individual we know has made bad decisions, and allow the individual who hasn't made bad decisions the opportunity to avoid making them.
Why don't we advocate for post birth abortions for the woman what would want this and give the baby to a family that would love and raise it.
Alternatively, why not insist that mothers who want to kill their children must also commit be euthanized? Let's raise the stakes a little and see how frequently women make this choice.
How often should a woman be given this choice? What would stop a depraved woman from having babies regularly and having them killed for enjoyment purposes?
Posted on 10/29/14 at 11:01 am to cwill
quote:
I think these campus pro-life people got trolled...hard
Feaking this!!!
Posted on 10/29/14 at 11:01 am to Poodlebrain
quote:This is idiotic, and is just as bad as an abortion. Murder is wrong.
This is a far better solution. Get rid of the individual we know has made bad decisions, and allow the individual who hasn't made bad decisions the opportunity to avoid making them.
quote:This is also idiotic. I'm sorry. I do try to be civil on important topics, but this is really just too stupid. I can only assume you're being hyperbolic.
Alternatively, why not insist that mothers who want to kill their children must also commit be euthanized? Let's raise the stakes a little and see how frequently women make this choice.
quote:See the above.
How often should a woman be given this choice? What would stop a depraved woman from having babies regularly and having them killed for enjoyment purposes?
Posted on 10/29/14 at 11:05 am to baytiger
Nazis creating mass death camps were likely considered so outrageous that it had to be a troll, at one point in time. Then it wasn't.
Posted on 10/29/14 at 11:07 am to genro
quote:
When you understand this, that cultures and morals do not just naturally evolve, it's hard not to be a social conservative these days
So they don't naturally evolve and you think that drives a person to social conservativism? Aren't social conservatives actively resisting the evolution of morality into a morality they don't like?
And in what "country" is cannibalism "totally fine and not immoral"?
Posted on 10/29/14 at 11:07 am to genro
quote:
If we have no standard whatsoever, then what?
well this pretty much sums up ethics in the 20th and 21st century.
quote:
Somebody has to say it, and some people have to listen. Right now we have a standard, and I think it's pretty decent.
Right but if you do not believe right/wrong is objective, then really anyone can say anything?
quote:
Why is your standard better?
I really have no standard to tell you the truth, just my opinion, which is what you saying all you have. My opinion is no more valid than your opinion, the only difference is that I recognize this where you might not.
quote:
This is deplorable to me
Nihilism has some really ugly outcomes. its really the only rational end conclusion once you determine your experience is subjective. But its quite frightening to look into the abyss.
Posted on 10/29/14 at 11:08 am to KeyserSoze999
When certain human life is devalued for monstrously vain and superficial reasons, then all human life is devalued.
It was as predictable as the sunrise.
It was as predictable as the sunrise.
Posted on 10/29/14 at 11:08 am to genro
quote:
I don't understand the end-game of encouraging homosexuality
You stopped making sense about 10 threads ago.
Posted on 10/29/14 at 11:09 am to Hawkeye95
Ask the Romans how well their moral "evolution" turned out.
Posted on 10/29/14 at 11:09 am to KeyserSoze999
quote:
Nazis creating mass death camps were likely considered so outrageous that it had to be a troll, at one point in time. Then it wasn't.
So you're doubling down on the troll. Good for you.
Posted on 10/29/14 at 11:11 am to bamarep
quote:You can say this about, literally, every past civilization. Because every past civilization is, by definition, done.
Ask the Romans how well their moral "evolution" turned out.
Posted on 10/29/14 at 11:12 am to Ace Midnight
quote:
When certain human life is devalued for monstrously vain and superficial reasons, then all human life is devalued.
this is the best pro life argument, the problem is that its inconsistently applied by many of those who make it.
its one are where I give the catholic church props, they seem to apply it everywhere. But modern conservatism often has no problem with war, the death penalty, drones killing kids, bombing of citizens by isreal, etc.
while I disagree with this view point, i do not believe all life is precious, I respect the application by the catholic church. They aren't hypocrites (when it comes to this).
This post was edited on 10/29/14 at 11:13 am
Posted on 10/29/14 at 11:14 am to Hawkeye95
quote:
But modern conservatism often has no problem with war, the death penalty, drones killing kids, bombing of citizens by isreal, etc.
you stupid, son?
Posted on 10/29/14 at 11:15 am to Hawkeye95
You're just saying the same thing over again. There is not objectivity. It must be synthetic. It will be synthetic or we will decay into nihilistic barbarians.
Ok, that part is established.
Now (subjectively) which synthetic moral system do you want? Or do you want none at all?
Ok, that part is established.
Now (subjectively) which synthetic moral system do you want? Or do you want none at all?
Posted on 10/29/14 at 11:17 am to cwill
Several countries in central Africa where feeding on pygmies is not a stigma.
There is no evolution of morality
There is no evolution of morality
Posted on 10/29/14 at 11:17 am to genro
quote:
Now (subjectively) which synthetic moral system do you want? Or do you want none at all?
he wants the one that conservatives don't agree with
Page 2 of 11
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News