- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Pederasta: FBI Conspiracy wanted Hillary to lose
Posted on 2/22/17 at 7:28 am
Posted on 2/22/17 at 7:28 am
LINK
Translation: if Hillary loses they're going to investigate my sick arse for diddling little boys.
quote:
There are at least forces within the FBI that wanted her to lose,” Podesta said during an interview with the website NewCo, Politico reported. “I’m not sure they really understood the alternative, but they wanted her to lose. I think that’s one possibility.”
The report said that Podesta did not offer any specific evidence to advance the argument, but Democrats have not been shy in the past to criticized FBI Director James Comey’s decision to—11 days before the election—alert Congress about the agency looking into additional emails.
Translation: if Hillary loses they're going to investigate my sick arse for diddling little boys.
Posted on 2/22/17 at 7:40 am to bamarep
The DNC sure loved them some FBI when Comey released his first report, absolving Hillary of any criminal intent. Again, no agenda, either way, even happens if she does not set up, use, and then lie about her own private server.
Posted on 2/22/17 at 7:41 am to Keltic Tiger
Podesta... they are out to get us....
quote:
The DNC sure loved them some FBI when Comey released his first report
This post was edited on 2/22/17 at 7:43 am
Posted on 2/22/17 at 7:42 am to bamarep
Time to search the basements, secret islands, and pizza places of high level democrats and nevertrumpers
The pedos must be purged from government
The pedos must be purged from government
Posted on 2/22/17 at 7:55 am to bamarep
quote:
Podesta
Why does anyone give this asshat a platform? Doesn't he have a pizza joint to run?
Posted on 2/22/17 at 7:57 am to bamarep
The smartest man in Hollywood continues to give zero fricks....
His response to the article you linked:
Actor James Woods tweet
His response to the article you linked:
Actor James Woods tweet
quote:
James WoodsVerified account
@RealJamesWoods
Put more walnut sauce on your #pizza and shut up, #Skippy. You're lucky you're not in jail yet. I stress "yet..."
This post was edited on 2/22/17 at 8:22 am
Posted on 2/22/17 at 8:01 am to Wtodd
These mentally challenged idiots will say anything. One wacko libtard called Trump a war criminal this morning lmfao.
Posted on 2/22/17 at 8:06 am to bamarep
It is a shame I need to share the same air as freaking Podesta.
Posted on 2/22/17 at 8:07 am to bamarep
Bullet to the brain for this twisted frick
Posted on 2/22/17 at 8:08 am to Keltic Tiger
quote:
The DNC sure loved them some FBI when Comey released his first report, absolving Hillary of any criminal intent. Again, no agenda, either way, even happens if she does not set up, use, and then lie about her own private server.
The statute doesn't require intent. Comey made that up. The fix was in for Clinton to become president and launch a war against the Russians.
Posted on 2/22/17 at 8:09 am to WhiskeyPapa
This post was edited on 2/22/17 at 8:12 am
Posted on 2/22/17 at 8:14 am to bamarep
Youtube of Podesta comments
For those interested, you can watch Podesta "craftily" tie together fake news, gun control, and censorship
Pay attention to his gestures during the interview (squirming around, touching his face repeatedly...)
For those interested, you can watch Podesta "craftily" tie together fake news, gun control, and censorship
Pay attention to his gestures during the interview (squirming around, touching his face repeatedly...)
Posted on 2/22/17 at 8:17 am to ThinePreparedAni
quote:
Pay attention to his gestures during the interview (s
he is a weasel
Posted on 2/22/17 at 8:17 am to WhiskeyPapa
The Deep State Goes to War With President-Elect, Using Unverified Claims, as Democrats Cheer
"IN JANUARY 1961, Dwight Eisenhower delivered his farewell address after serving two terms as U.S. president; the five-star general chose to warn Americans of this specific threat to democracy: “In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist.” That warning was issued prior to the decade long escalation of the Vietnam War, three more decades of Cold War mania, and the post-9/11 era, all of which radically expanded that unelected faction’s power even further.
This is the faction that is now engaged in open warfare against the duly elected and already widely disliked president-elect, Donald Trump. They are using classic Cold War dirty tactics and the defining ingredients of what has until recently been denounced as “Fake News.”
Their most valuable instrument is the U.S. media, much of which reflexively reveres, serves, believes, and sides with hidden intelligence officials. And Democrats, still reeling from their unexpected and traumatic election loss, as well as a systemic collapse of their party, seemingly divorced further and further from reason with each passing day, are willing — eager — to embrace any claim, cheer any tactic, align with any villain, regardless of how unsupported, tawdry, and damaging those behaviors might be.
The serious dangers posed by a Trump presidency are numerous and manifest. There is a wide array of legitimate and effective tactics for combating those threats: from bipartisan congressional coalitions and constitutional legal challenges to citizen uprisings and sustained and aggressive civil disobedience. All of those strategies have periodically proven themselves effective in times of political crisis or authoritarian overreach.
But cheering for the CIA and its shadowy allies to unilaterally subvert the U.S. election and impose its own policy dictates on the elected president is both warped and self-destructive. Empowering the very entities that have produced the most shameful atrocities and systemic deceit over the last six decades is desperation of the worst kind. Demanding that evidence-free, anonymous assertions be instantly venerated as Truth — despite emanating from the very precincts designed to propagandize and lie — is an assault on journalism, democracy, and basic human rationality. And casually branding domestic adversaries who refuse to go along as traitors and disloyal foreign operatives is morally bankrupt and certain to backfire on those doing it.
Beyond all that, there is no bigger favor that Trump opponents can do for him than attacking him with such lowly, shabby, obvious shams, recruiting large media outlets to lead the way. When it comes time to expose actual Trump corruption and criminality, who is going to believe the people and institutions who have demonstrated they are willing to endorse any assertions no matter how factually baseless, who deploy any journalistic tactic no matter how unreliable and removed from basic means of ensuring accuracy?"
LINK
Much more and very important at the link.
Posted on 2/22/17 at 8:20 am to bamarep
quote:
There are at least forces within the FBI that wanted her to lose,
And there are forces within the CIA/NSA that want to bring Trump down WHILE he's president under the pretense that he's some sinister "Russian agent" which is nothing but fake news. And these people committed multiple felonies in the process.
Unlike the Trump Russian angle, Hillary's e-mails were not fake news. She destroyed them and ADMITTED to destroying them. No one in the press ever thought it pertinent to ask her exactly why she chose to do this (they were too busy slipping her the debate questions beforehand). Eventually the FBI had enough and decided to step in. The problem is they couldn't forensically recover the e-mails, and when they asked her partners in crime about it, they all pleaded the 5th. Nothing at all suspicious there. Just keep your eyes on Russia, guys.
Posted on 2/22/17 at 8:24 am to WhiskeyPapa
More from Greenwald:
"FOR MONTHS, THE CIA, with unprecedented clarity, overtly threw its weight behind Hillary Clinton’s candidacy and sought to defeat Donald Trump. In August, former acting CIA Director Michael Morell announced his endorsement of Clinton in the New York Times and claimed that “Mr. Putin had recruited Mr. Trump as an unwitting agent of the Russian Federation.” The CIA and NSA director under George W. Bush, Gen. Michael Hayden, also endorsed Clinton and went to the Washington Post to warn, in the week before the election, that “Donald Trump really does sound a lot like Vladimir Putin,” adding that Trump is “the useful fool, some naif, manipulated by Moscow, secretly held in contempt, but whose blind support is happily accepted and exploited.”
It is not hard to understand why the CIA preferred Clinton over Trump. Clinton was critical of Obama for restraining the CIA’s proxy war in Syria and was eager to expand that war, while Trump denounced it. Clinton clearly wanted a harder line than Obama took against the CIA’s long-standing foes in Moscow, while Trump wanted improved relations and greater cooperation. In general, Clinton defended and intended to extend the decadeslong international military order on which the CIA and Pentagon’s preeminence depends, while Trump — through a still-uncertain mix of instability and extremist conviction — posed a threat to it."
-- The Dark State is freaking out. We must support the president.
"FOR MONTHS, THE CIA, with unprecedented clarity, overtly threw its weight behind Hillary Clinton’s candidacy and sought to defeat Donald Trump. In August, former acting CIA Director Michael Morell announced his endorsement of Clinton in the New York Times and claimed that “Mr. Putin had recruited Mr. Trump as an unwitting agent of the Russian Federation.” The CIA and NSA director under George W. Bush, Gen. Michael Hayden, also endorsed Clinton and went to the Washington Post to warn, in the week before the election, that “Donald Trump really does sound a lot like Vladimir Putin,” adding that Trump is “the useful fool, some naif, manipulated by Moscow, secretly held in contempt, but whose blind support is happily accepted and exploited.”
It is not hard to understand why the CIA preferred Clinton over Trump. Clinton was critical of Obama for restraining the CIA’s proxy war in Syria and was eager to expand that war, while Trump denounced it. Clinton clearly wanted a harder line than Obama took against the CIA’s long-standing foes in Moscow, while Trump wanted improved relations and greater cooperation. In general, Clinton defended and intended to extend the decadeslong international military order on which the CIA and Pentagon’s preeminence depends, while Trump — through a still-uncertain mix of instability and extremist conviction — posed a threat to it."
-- The Dark State is freaking out. We must support the president.
Posted on 2/22/17 at 8:29 am to WhiskeyPapa
"Clinton was critical of Obama for restraining the CIA’s proxy war in Syria and was eager to expand that war, while Trump denounced it."
Clinton was an Israeli proxy and surrogate.
We wrecked Libya for the Israelis.
Clinton's number one donor was an Israeli billionaire, Haim Saban. Clinton was chomping at the bit to get more of our guys killed for Israeli ends - ends that were the opposite of true US interests. She wanted to continue the work she started by voting in 2002 to invade Iraq.
Clinton was an Israeli proxy and surrogate.
We wrecked Libya for the Israelis.
Clinton's number one donor was an Israeli billionaire, Haim Saban. Clinton was chomping at the bit to get more of our guys killed for Israeli ends - ends that were the opposite of true US interests. She wanted to continue the work she started by voting in 2002 to invade Iraq.
This post was edited on 2/22/17 at 8:31 am
Posted on 2/22/17 at 8:39 am to WhiskeyPapa
quote:
Clinton's number one donor was an Israeli billionaire, Haim Saban
The plot thickens.
Posted on 2/22/17 at 9:19 am to bamarep
O' how the mighty have fallen.
Indeed.
quote:
Translation: if Hillary loses they're going to investigate my sick arse for diddling little boys.
Indeed.
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News