- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Open Letter From Kim Dotcom to Family of Seth Rich
Posted on 5/25/17 at 11:28 am to Langland
Posted on 5/25/17 at 11:28 am to Langland
quote:
nor can I sit idly by without communicating what I know to
the appropriate authorities. I will, through my legal team, progress the necessary
arrangements with the authorities.
What fricking "necessary arrangements"? If he has evidence, why doesn't he just give it to the authorities? What a piece of trash exploiting an innocent family's grief for personal aggrandizement.
1
Posted on 5/25/17 at 11:28 am to Iosh
quote:Did you read it? He repeated several times that he has justification for a law suit right now but is not proceeding with it. He will do so, however, if the family continues to repeat false, defamatory allegations against him. The letter appears to have been written in good faith asking the family to stop trying to interfere with the investigation by discrediting the evidence before it is viewed by the authorities.
The best way to help a grieving family is a frivolous lawsuit.
Posted on 5/25/17 at 11:30 am to Langland
What a fricking scumbag.
Posted on 5/25/17 at 11:31 am to Langland
The sad part of all this, Dotcom is fighting the DNC via the Rich family. The Rich family are DNC pawns in this disput.
Posted on 5/25/17 at 11:32 am to FooManChoo
quote:Oh, my mistake, I didn't realize he repeated it several times
Did you read it? He repeated several times that he has justification for a law suit right now
Posted on 5/25/17 at 11:33 am to Iosh
what comes after shark jumping? Because we've crossed it
Posted on 5/25/17 at 11:35 am to Nuts4LSU
quote:
What fricking "necessary arrangements"? If he has evidence, why doesn't he just give it to the authorities? What a piece of trash exploiting an innocent family's grief for personal aggrandizement.
Kim Dotcom extradition to the United States can go ahead, New Zealand high court rules
The kind who lost his last appeal not to be extradited to the United States on serious federal charges and/or an attention whore.
Posted on 5/25/17 at 11:36 am to CorporateTiger
quote:
The kind who lost his last appeal not to be extradited to the United States on serious federal charges and/or an attention whore.
Bingo.
This point can't be made enough.
Posted on 5/25/17 at 11:37 am to Tiguar
quote:Jumping the shark is the wrong analogy because Happy Days got less popular after that. This forum is still eating this shite up and showing no signs of getting full.
what comes after shark jumping? Because we've crossed it
Posted on 5/25/17 at 11:38 am to FooManChoo
quote:
He repeated several times that he has justification for a law suit right now but is not proceeding with it.
Take it from a lawyer. He's full of shite.
Posted on 5/25/17 at 11:51 am to FooManChoo
quote:
Did you read it? He repeated several times that he has justification for a law suit right now but is not proceeding with it. He will do so, however, if the family continues to repeat false, defamatory allegations against him. The letter appears to have been written in good faith asking the family to stop trying to interfere with the investigation by discrediting the evidence before it is viewed by the authorities.
Brilliant legal analysis baw
Posted on 5/25/17 at 12:08 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
Dems don't want to hear the truth. They are afraid of it.
Lots of lib kool-aid drinkers up in here today.
Lots of lib kool-aid drinkers up in here today.
Posted on 5/25/17 at 12:09 pm to Iosh
His name was Circus Child.
Posted on 5/25/17 at 12:13 pm to Langland
quote:
the truth
What is "the truth" you're talking about?
Posted on 5/25/17 at 12:26 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
What is "the truth" you're talking about?
Posted on 5/25/17 at 12:30 pm to Langland
Cool. Lay out your proof.
Posted on 5/25/17 at 12:32 pm to Langland
That really is one of the worst political cartoons I've ever seen.
Posted on 5/25/17 at 12:32 pm to Langland
that's your answer...a fricking cartoon?
you could not have fricking come up with a better metaphor for this buffoonery if you tried.
you seem to confuse your Google search for my law degree and years of experience, and you're a fricking idiot for doing so.
you could not have fricking come up with a better metaphor for this buffoonery if you tried.
you seem to confuse your Google search for my law degree and years of experience, and you're a fricking idiot for doing so.
Posted on 5/25/17 at 1:04 pm to Iosh
quote:You made the point that he's just trying to push a frivolous lawsuit. Whether he is or not, his letter affirmed the opposite.
Oh, my mistake, I didn't realize he repeated it several times
Posted on 5/25/17 at 1:07 pm to FooManChoo
quote:
his letter affirmed the opposite.
His letter asserted the opposite. His threats are bullshite and any suit he brought would be frivolous.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News