- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Open Letter From Kim Dotcom to Family of Seth Rich
Posted on 5/25/17 at 1:08 pm to Seldom Seen
Posted on 5/25/17 at 1:08 pm to Seldom Seen
quote:Is there any way to check if this guy it a bot?
Seldom Seen
0
Posted on 5/25/17 at 1:09 pm to FooManChoo
quote:You seem like you've got a solid grasp on US law, in addition to basic rationality.
You made the point that he's just trying to push a frivolous lawsuit. Whether he is or not, his letter affirmed the opposite.
Posted on 5/25/17 at 1:12 pm to Iosh
quote:I was providing a non-legal response to your non-legal statement based on the text of the letter that was in the OP for everyone to read, including yourself. I wasn't arguing the truthfulness or validity of his statement, only the plain text of it, which contradicted what you said.
You seem like you've got a solid grasp on US law, in addition to basic rationality
Posted on 5/25/17 at 1:14 pm to FooManChoo
Even if he has a legal case, this is awful form. I'm MAGA, want to believe the Seth Rich tinfoil, and hope Kim has the goods. All of that said, him being a whiny titty baby about being defamed is hilarious given that he made a lot of his money from facilitating copyright infringement.
Posted on 5/25/17 at 1:41 pm to FooManChoo
quote:
I wasn't arguing the truthfulness or validity of his statement
Well, unintentionally, you did argue that.
Posted on 5/25/17 at 1:47 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:I summarized what he said in his statement, not whether or not what he said was factual.
Well, unintentionally, you did argue that.
Iosh said: "The best way to help a grieving family is a frivolous lawsuit."
His statement was contradicted by the statement of KDC, who specifically stated that he had grounds for a defamation suit but is not proceeding in order to work together with the family.
I don't know whether or not he has grounds as he claims, but he mentioned several times that he is not proceeding with a "frivolous lawsuit", as Iosh was saying, and that was my point.
This post was edited on 5/25/17 at 1:47 pm
Posted on 5/25/17 at 1:48 pm to FooManChoo
You are a special kind of oblivious aren't you?
Posted on 5/25/17 at 1:48 pm to FooManChoo
CorporateTiger already laid this out for you. I won't steal his work, or rehash it.
Posted on 5/25/17 at 1:52 pm to Langland
His letter is believable. More believable than the IC and the media, certainly.
And I believe the family is being intimidated into squashing the conspiracy theory.
And I believe the family is being intimidated into squashing the conspiracy theory.
Posted on 5/25/17 at 2:02 pm to CorporateTiger
quote:I must be. Go ahead and educate me.
You are a special kind of oblivious aren't you?
Posted on 5/25/17 at 2:40 pm to Iosh
quote:
The best way to help a grieving family is a frivolous lawsuit.
Helping the grieving family, while important, is not the top priority for those investigating the murder. This should be common sense.
Also, it's extremely disingenuous for you to pretend like you care about the family. You don't give a shite. You just don't like the political implications of the investigation...so you pretend it's about the family.
Honestly, those who use the family as an excuse are much worse than those who simply think the investigation is important enough to continue.
Page 3 of 3
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News