Started By
Message

re: Once Gay Rights Are Fully Recognized...What Is The Next Civil Rights Frontier?

Posted on 2/5/14 at 8:25 am to
Posted by DeltaDoc
The Delta
Member since Jan 2008
16089 posts
Posted on 2/5/14 at 8:25 am to
Here is another potential "civil right" I could see pushed in the future:

The right not to work, but to receive government assistance.

Right now, even though more people are receiving assistance from the government than ever before, there is still a stigma associated with being a welfare recipient or food stamp recipient or Medicaid recipient, etc.

I could see a movement, especially from the left, to make this a life style choice and allow it to be perfectly permissible and protected.

We have already seen efforts to drug test welfare recipient or to limit the types of foods that food stamps are valid for shot down as being discriminatory, both legislatively and in the courts.

Truth be told, there should probably also be very strict diet restrictions placed on medicare/Medicaid recipients as well.

Hell, it is even considered discrimination to make someone show their ID (which is given to them freely) to vote.
Posted by darkhorse
Member since Aug 2012
7701 posts
Posted on 2/5/14 at 8:40 am to
quote:

HempHead


Need to wake up!


quote:

Children, and likewise animals, are not afforded this ability.


According to the very doctors who decide if it is a sexual orientation, yes they can.

To word it another way, doctors disagree with you and say it is a positive experience for them in most cases.


Sick isn't it....
Posted by darkhorse
Member since Aug 2012
7701 posts
Posted on 2/5/14 at 8:50 am to
quote:

HempHead


You want a clear argument against a grown man having sex with a kid? Seriously? You need a scientific reason to see how that's wrong?

What about just simple logic.

Posted by darkhorse
Member since Aug 2012
7701 posts
Posted on 2/5/14 at 8:54 am to
Please go look up b4u-act and find out who it's founder is. How many times he was in jail for this very thing they are pushing for.

I did not realize how many people would step out and defend the act of sex with a child. WOW!! some of you need help!
Posted by HempHead
Big Sky Country
Member since Mar 2011
55517 posts
Posted on 2/5/14 at 8:56 am to
quote:

You want a clear argument against a grown man having sex with a kid? Seriously? You need a scientific reason to see how that's wrong?





I have already asserted that pedophilia is invalid because children lack the ability to consent.
This post was edited on 2/5/14 at 8:58 am
Posted by Upperaltiger06
North Alabama
Member since Feb 2012
3948 posts
Posted on 2/5/14 at 9:30 am to
Criminals. Criminal behavior will be viewed on a biological/pathological basis. There will be a move toward rehabilitation as opposed to imprisonment.
Posted by DeltaDoc
The Delta
Member since Jan 2008
16089 posts
Posted on 2/5/14 at 9:39 am to
quote:

Criminal behavior will be viewed on a biological/pathological basis


I could see this as well. Although, politicians supporting criminals is very politically risky.
Posted by JakeTheDog
Arizona
Member since Jan 2014
152 posts
Posted on 2/5/14 at 10:06 am to
quote:

The issue is, how long before people realize that the majority of folks in human history were perfectly ok with a 10 year old marrying a 40 year old?


Where do you get that the majority of people in human history were fine with a 10 year old marrying a 40 year old?
Posted by Roger Klarvin
DFW
Member since Nov 2012
46555 posts
Posted on 2/5/14 at 10:14 am to
quote:

Where do you get that the majority of people in human history were fine with a 10 year old marrying a 40 year old?


For most of human history, people were considered "adults" by age 13 or earlier. The vast majority of cultures married of their children, especially their daughters, at very young ages. Literature clearly bears this out for people who don't like history. Even the Mary of the bible is believed to have been about 13.

This idea of 18 being the legal age is a very recent, very western concept. Even today, the majority of human beings alive would laugh at the idea of waiting until 18 to be a legal adult.
Posted by ManBearTiger
BRLA
Member since Jun 2007
21862 posts
Posted on 2/5/14 at 10:17 am to
Polygamysts' rights
Pedophile's rights
Transvesttite children rights
Cross breeders' rights (man/animal)

Posted by DonChowder
Sonoma County
Member since Dec 2012
9249 posts
Posted on 2/5/14 at 10:18 am to
Wheelchair bound NBA Refs.
Posted by ManBearTiger
BRLA
Member since Jun 2007
21862 posts
Posted on 2/5/14 at 10:21 am to
quote:

Criminals. Criminal behavior will be viewed on a biological/pathological basis. There will be a move toward rehabilitation as opposed to imprisonment.


If you're related to a criminal, both your sentence and the relative (if living) will be shortened?

Maybe we could have a max of like a 100 years/bloodline?

You know, keep things on an equal footing

John Suburbanwhiteboy gets 25 years max sentencing for mansluaghter while drunk driving because no one in his family has ever been convicted;

Tyrone gets 6 months probation for manslaughter because his family's just about maxed out?
This post was edited on 2/5/14 at 10:23 am
Posted by BigJim
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2010
14515 posts
Posted on 2/5/14 at 10:30 am to
Polygamy

If you take the "marriage is a right" instead of a "marriage is a societal sanction" route; I cannot see a reason against it.

Historically (and still today in some cases) plural marriages included wives below the age of consent. Those prohibitions will still stand.
Posted by darkhorse
Member since Aug 2012
7701 posts
Posted on 2/5/14 at 10:36 am to
quote:

I have already asserted that pedophilia is invalid because children lack the ability to consent.


And the same doctors pushing for it is telling you your argument is not valid. Now what?
Posted by HempHead
Big Sky Country
Member since Mar 2011
55517 posts
Posted on 2/5/14 at 10:37 am to
quote:

Now what?


I vehemently disagree with them.

What doctors suggest that children possess the ability to consent to sex?
Posted by darkhorse
Member since Aug 2012
7701 posts
Posted on 2/5/14 at 10:39 am to
quote:

What doctors suggest that children possess the ability to consent to sex?


the members of b4u-act.

Not to mention the others in the links provided.
Posted by HempHead
Big Sky Country
Member since Mar 2011
55517 posts
Posted on 2/5/14 at 10:40 am to
I very much doubt that society at large will become accepting of their prepubescent children having sex with adults simply because a small group of doctors assert that the children can give consent.
Posted by darkhorse
Member since Aug 2012
7701 posts
Posted on 2/5/14 at 10:53 am to
quote:

I very much doubt that society at large will become accepting of their prepubescent children having sex with adults simply because a small group of doctors assert that the children can give consent.



Small group of doctors? Since when is it a small group? I gave you an organization, I gave you a link to Harvard, I linked you to a presentation to Parliament, I linked you to the head at Johns Hopkins.

This is by far more than a few doctors Hemp. Maybe more research on it? What about the book used in 3,700 schools that has a chapter in it on man boy love?

Tell me why it's being used in 3,700 schools nation wide?
Posted by HempHead
Big Sky Country
Member since Mar 2011
55517 posts
Posted on 2/5/14 at 10:55 am to
quote:

I gave you a link to Harvard, I linked you to a presentation to Parliament, I linked you to the head at Johns Hopkins.


I didn't see those, I had not read the entire thread before posting. I will take a look.
first pageprev pagePage 7 of 7Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram